Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:43:21.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Obstructive Clearing on Glossina palpalis (R.-D.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

T. A. M. Nash
Affiliation:
West African Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research
J. O. Steiner
Affiliation:
Sleeping Sickness Service, Northern Nigeria.

Summary

An experiment has been undertaken in Northern Nigeria to ascertain whether the felling of the trees forming the overhead canopy and the deliberate blocking, with trash, of the stream-bed to obstruct the tsetse's flight-line, would result in the eradication of Glossina palpalis (R.-D.).

Obstructive clearing was employed on approximately 3¾ miles of stream. The results suggest that, provided the experimental reaches are adequately isolated, obstructive clearing does lead to the eradication of G. palpalis.

It is noteworthy that if, owing to inadequate isolation, the cleared stream becomes re-infested in the rains, conditions for at least the first two dry seasons are so unfavourable that flies cannot persist.

The immediate effect of obstructive clearing is to increase greatly the hunger of the few surviving flies.

Records suggest that obstructive clearing leads to a considerable reduction in the number of human hosts visiting uninhabited parts of the stream, presumably because of the destruction of forest produce. The duiker (Sylvicapra and Cephalophus) population also becomes greatly reduced, especially in the vicinity of hamlets. The hunger observed in the surviving fly population may therefore be in part due to an actual reduction in the number of hosts, as well as to the altered environment, which prevents free movement, under shade, of the hungry tsetse that is searching for food; instead, the tsetse is forced out into the open, where the climate in the dry season is intolerable, and presumably the unsuccessful fly rapidly succumbs from water-loss.

The effect of obstructive clearing on the vegetation is as follows. Within a few weeks the mound of trash is overgrown with creepers, Mucuna pruriens becoming dominant. In the first year's heavy rains the mound of trash tends to sink down in the stream-bed; on larger streams, spates do some temporary damage to the creeper growth and gaps may appear in the obstruction. The impression gained is that the blockage will persist for many years on small tributaries, but will disintegrate within a few years on larger streams. In very hilly country, with a rapid run off, the obstruction is likely to be displaced. In perennial streams of the type dealt with, the annual fires make only small inroads into the obstruction.

The technique evolved for the obstructive clearing of streams is described. The cost of this method worked out at 390 man days per mile, which is about half the cost of the present methods.

Should large-scale undertakings in the field confirm the efficacy of this new method, the biggest saving will be the elimination of the present necessity to re-slash streams that have been partially cleared. Observations will be continued to ascertain how long it will be before the vegetation again becomes suitable for G. palpalis.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nash, T. A. M. (1940). The effect upon Glossina of changing the climate in the true habitat by partial clearing of vegetation.—Bull. ent. Res, 31, pp. 6984.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1948). Tsetse flies in British West Africa.—77 pp. London, Colon. Off., H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. & Page, W. A. (1953). The ecology of Glossina palpalis in Northern Nigeria.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond, 104, pp. 71169.Google Scholar