Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:29:25.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of within-crop habitat manipulations on the conservation biological control of aphids in field-grown lettuce

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2011

D.J. Skirvin ,
L. Kravar-Garde ,
K. Reynolds ,
C. Wright  and
A. Mead
D.J. Skirvin*
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
L. Kravar-Garde
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
K. Reynolds
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
C. Wright
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
A. Mead
Affiliation:
University of Warwick, Warwick HRI, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF, UK
*
*Author for correspondence Fax: +44 1902 743602 E-mail: Dave.Skirvin@adas.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Within-crop habitat manipulations have the potential to increase the biological control of pests in horticultural field crops. Wildflower strips have been shown to increase the abundance of natural enemies, but there is little evidence to date of an impact on pest populations. The aim of this study was to determine whether within-crop wildflower strips can increase the natural regulation of pests in horticultural field crops. Aphid numbers in plots of lettuce grown adjacent to wildflower strips were compared with those in plots grown in the absence of wildflowers. The presence of wildflower strips led to a decrease in aphid numbers on adjacent lettuce plants during June and July, but had less impact in August and September. The decrease in aphid numbers was greatest close to the wildflower strips and, the decrease in aphid numbers declined with increasing distance from the wildflower strips, with little effect at a distance of ten metres. The main natural enemies found in the crop were those that dispersed aerially, which is consistent with data from previous studies on cereal crops. Analysis and interpretation of natural enemy numbers was difficult due to low recovery of natural enemies, and the numbers appeared to follow changes in aphid abundance rather than being directly linked to the presence of wildflower strips. Cutting the wildflower strips, to remove floral resources, had no impact on the reduction in aphid numbers achieved during June and July, but decreased the effect of the wildflower strips during August and September. The results suggest that wildflower strips can lead to increased natural regulation of pest aphids in outdoor lettuce crops, but more research is required to determine how this is mediated by natural enemies and how the impact of wildflower strips on natural pest regulation changes during the growing season.

Keywords

wildflower stripmulchaphidlettucebiological controlhabitat manipulation
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 101 , Issue 6 , December 2011 , pp. 623 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baggen, L.R., Gurr, G.M. & Meats, A. (1999) Flowers in tri-trophic systems: mechanisms allowing selective exploitation by insect natural enemies for conservation biological control. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicatta 91, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugg, R.L. & Pickett, C.H. (1998) Introduction: enhancing biological control – habitat management to promote natural enemies of agricultural pests. pp. 1–23 in Pickett, C.H. & Bugg, R.L. (Eds) Enhancing Biological Control. Berkeley, CA, USA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chaney, W.E. (1998) Biological control of aphids in lettuce using in-field insectaries. pp. 73–83 in Pickett, C.H. & Bugg, R.L. (Eds) Enhancing Biological Control. Berkeley, CA, USA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ekesi, S., Shah, P., Clark, S.J. & Pell, J.K. (2005) Conservation biological control with the fungal pathogen Pandora neoaphidis: implications of aphid species, host plant and predator foraging. Agricultural and Orest Entomology 7, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, T. (1997) Species diversity of ground beetles (Carabidae) in sown weed strips and adjacent fields. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 15, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, T. & Reichhart, B. (2004) Staphylinidae and Carabidae overwintering in wheat and sown wildflower areas of different age. Bulletin of Entomological Research 94, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, G.J.K., Holland, J.M., Bailey, A. & Thomas, M.B. (2008) Efficacy and economics of shelter habitats for conservation biological control. Biological Control 45, 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, G.M., Wratten, S.D. & Luna, J.M. (2003) Multi-function agricultural biodiversity: pest management and other benefits. Basic and Applied Ecology 4, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J.M., Oaten, H., Southway, S. & Moreby, S. (2008) The effectiveness of field margin enhancement for cereal aphid control by different natural enemy guilds. Biological Control 47, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, M., Wratten, S.D., Landis, D.A. & Gurr, G.M. (2008) Recent advances in conservation biological control of arthropods by arthropods. Biological Control 45, 172–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. (1988a) Assessment of aphid colonies by hoverflies I. Maple aphids and Episyrphus balteatus (De Geer) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Ethology 6, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. (1988b) Assessment of aphid colonies by hoverflies II: Pea aphids and 3 syrphid species; Betasyrphus serarius(Wiedemann), Metasyrphus frequens Matsumura and Syrphus vitripennis (Meigen) (Diptera: Syrphidae). Journal of Ethology 6, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landis, D.A., Wratten, S.D. & Gurr, G.M. (2000) Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langellotto, G.A. & Denno, R.F. (2004) Response of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structure habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 139, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, B., Loxton, D., Sparks, T., Pywell, R., Pickett, H. & Nowakowski, M. (2002) The effect of arable field margin composition on invertebrate biodiversity. Biological Conservation 106, 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, T.A., Tylianakis, J.M. & Scharntke, T. (2006) Spillover edge effects: the dispersal of agriculturally subsidized insect natural enemies into adjacent natural habitats. Ecology Letters 9, 603–614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rebek, E.J., Sadof, C.S. & Hanks, L.M. (2005) Manipulating the abundance of natural enemies in ornamental landscapes with floral resource plants. Biological Control 33, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straub, C.S., Finke, D.L. & Snyder, W.E. (2008) Are the conservation of natural enemy biodiversity and biological control compatible goals? Biological Control 45, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M.B., Wratten, S.D. & Sotherton, N.W. (1991) Creation of ‘island’ habitats in farmland to manipulate populations of beneficial arthropods: predator densities and species composition. Journal of Applied Ecology 29, 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M.B., Mitchell, H.J. & Wratten, S.D. (1992) Abiotic and biotic factors influencing the winter distribution of predatory insects. Oecologia 89, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tscharntke, T., Rand, T.A. & Bianchi, F.J.J.A. (2005) The landscape context of trophic interactions: insect spillover across the crop-noncrop interface. Annales Zoologici Fennici 42, 421–432.Google Scholar
Wäckers, F.L., Bjornsten, A. & Dorn, S. (1996) A comparison of flowering herbs with respect to their nectar accessibility for the parasitoid Pimpla turionellae. Proceedings of Experimental and Applied Entomology 7, 177–182.Google Scholar
Wissinger, S.A. (1997) Cyclic colonization in predictably ephemeral habitats: A template for biological control in annual crop systems. Biological Control 10, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J.Z., Ayers, G.S., Grafius, E.J. & Stehr, F.W. (1992) Effects of neighbouring nectar-producing plants on populations of pest Lepidoptera and their parasitoids in broccoli plantings. Great Lakes Entomologist 25, 253–258.Google Scholar