Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:29:23.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of a chemical Defoliant on an isolated Tsetse Fly Community and its Vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Summary

Three aerial applications of the n-butyl ester of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic m acid (2,4,5-T) in diesel oil were made at intervals of six weeks to an isolated woodland community on a peninsula in Lake Victoria, Kenya. The woodland contained two species of tsetse fly, Glossina pallidipes Aust. and G. palpalis (R.-D.) (subsp. fuscipes Newst.). The object of the treatment was to defoliate the woodland in order to ascertain whether the reduction in shade would control the tsetse fly. It was also desired to obtain further information on the effect of the spray applications on the woody plant species.

The first application, at an estimated actual dosage of 2·2 lb. 2,4,5·T per acre, resulted in a rapid defoliation of 13 out of the 15 observed leafy species, eight of, which subsequently died during the following nine months. Two succulent species of Euphorbia also died during this period. Of the remaining two species, one was fully defoliated only after the third application but recovered slowly, while the other, Lecaniodiscus vaughaniae, was but slightly affected at any time.

No significant reduction in the numbers of tsetse fly was observed during the nine-month period following the first spraying. The following factors probably account for this lack of effect: the varying rate of defoliation of the different plant species, the resistance to the spray of one locally abundant species, the persistent shade cast by the stems of the thick vegetation after defoliation and the relatively humid climate during the period of maximum defoliation. These factors allowed an environment favourable for the tsetse fly to exist in one part or another of the peninsula in spite of the severe effects on the vegetation.

Nine months after the first spraying, between a third and a half of the vegetation was destroyed during the dry season by an accidental fire. The effect on G. pallidipes was almost immediate, and two months later the population had been reduced to a fairly low level, which was maintained for the last 16 months of the experiment. The fire hardly affected the environment of G. palpalis and the main effect of defoliation was to cause this species to concentrate near the shady lake shore, where the dominant tree was Lecaniodiscus vaughaniae.

There is little doubt that the destruction of the vegetation by fire was made possible by the effects of the spray applications, as the hitherto evergreen thicket would normally have been unburnable. While this suggests a possible new technique for bush clearance, further trials have indicated several factors which may make difficult a satisfactory burn following defoliation.

Details are given of the assessment of the spray droplet performance both in calibration trials and during the applications to the peninsula.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, W. R. G., Poole, H. H. & Stanbury, F. A. (1937). The measurement of the intensity and the colour of light in woods by means of emission and rectifier photo-electric cells.—Proc. roy. Soc, (B) 121, pp. 427450.Google Scholar
Blackman, G. E. & Rutter, A. J. (1946). Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment. I. The light factor and the distribution of the bluebell (Scilla non-scripta) in woodland communities. —Ann. Bot, (N.S.) 10, pp. 361390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivens, G. W. (1954). Some trials with defoliants and arboricides in East Africa. —Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 1954, pp. 499508.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1940). The analysis of a tsetse-fly population.—Ann. Eugen, 10, pp. 332369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1944). The analysis of a tsetse-fly population. II.—Ann. Eugen, 12, pp. 176205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1948). The analysis of a tsetse-fly population. III.—Ann. Eugen, 14, pp. 91108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, C. H. N. (1953). A mixed population of Glossina morsitans and G. swynnertoni.—J. Anim. Ecol, 22, pp. 7886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swynnerton, C. F. M. (1921). An examination of the tsetse problem in North Mossurise, Portuguese East Africa.—Bull. ent. Res, 11, pp. 315385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swynnerton, C. F. M. (1936). The tsetse flies of East Africa.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond, 84, pp. 1579.Google Scholar
Yeo, D. (1954). Aircraft applications of insecticides in East Africa. IX. Further experiments on the deposition in open country of a coarse aerosol released from an aircraft.—Bull. ent. Res, 45, pp. 745749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, D. & Thompson, B. W. (1953). Deposition of a coarse aerosol released from a low-flying aircraft.—Nature, Lond, 172, pp. 168169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, D. & Thompson, B. W. (1954). Aircraft applications of insecticides in East Africa. V. The deposition in open country of a coarse aerosol released from an aircraft.—Bull. ent. Res, 45, pp. 7992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar