Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:28:09.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Food source orientation and activity in Rhodnius prolixus Stål (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Josué A. Núñez
Josué A. Núñez
Affiliation:
Fisiología del Comportamiento, Centro de Biofísica y Bioquímica, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cientificas (IVIC), Apartado 1827, Caracas 1010A, Venezuela
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Locomotor activity in an actograph and oriented locomotor movements in an olfactometer were recorded for fifth-instar nymphs of Rhodnius prolixus Stål exposed to test stimuli expected to elicit food-seeking behaviour. A natural food source (hamster or human forearm) proved to be the most attractive stimulus. Warmth alone was least stimulating for long-range orientation. As with mosquitoes, carbondioxide and moisture proved to be attractive, as well as the odour of a hamster. Lactic acid did not seem to play an important role in orientation. Activation by the different stimuli was most pronounced during the scotophase of the circadian cycle. Circadian activity ran-free for two weeks in constant darkness. The results indicate that the stimuli that elicit locomotor activity in the actograph are in some way implicated in the switching of the taxis mechanisms that utilise the airstream for orientation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 253 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Zeev, M., Maibach, H. I. & Khan, A. A. (1977). Studies on the attraction of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) to man.—J. med. Entomol. 14, 113–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertram, D. S. (1971). Attraction of triatomine bug vectors of Chagas's disease to Beta-lights.—Nature, Lond. 231, 268.Google Scholar
Croxton, F. E. (1953). Elementary statistics.—376 pp. New York, Dover Publ., Inc.Google Scholar
Jander, R. (1963). Insect orientation.—A. Rev. Ent. 8, 95–114.Google Scholar
Kellogg, F. E. (1970). Water vapour and carbon dioxide receptors in Aedes aegypti.— J. Insect Physiol. 16. 99–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A. A. (1977). Mosquito attractants and repellents.—pp. 305–325in Shorey, H. H. & McKelvey, J. J. Jr. (Eds.). Chemical control of insect behavior. Theory and application.—414 pp. New York, J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Schofield, C. J. (1979). The behaviour of Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae): a review.— Bull. ent. Res. 69, 363–379.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, D. (1956). Die Bedeutung der Umweltfaktoren für den Saugakt von Triatoma infestans.—Acta trop. 13, 97–141.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. & Gillett, J. D. (1934). The function of the antennae in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera) and the mechanism of orientation to the host.—J. exp. Biol. 11, 120–139, 408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar