Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:42:30.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habitat difference in abundance of willow leaf beetle Phratora vulgatissima (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): plant quality or natural enemies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2007

P. Dalin
P. Dalin*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7044, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
*Current address: Marine Science Institute, University of California at Santa Barbara, CA 93106-6150, USA Fax: 1 805 893 8062 E-mail: dalin@msi.ucsb.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbivorous insects are influenced by both ‘bottom-up’ forces mediated through host plants and ‘top-down’ forces from natural enemies. Few studies have tried to evaluate the relative importance of the two forces in determining the abundance of insects. The leaf beetle Phratora vulgatissima Linnaeus sometimes occurs at high densities and severely damages the willow Salix cinerea in forest habitats. For willows growing in open agricultural landscapes (farmland S. cinerea), the leaf beetle generally occurs at low densities and plants receive little damage. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative importance of host plant quality and natural enemies behind the observed difference in P. vulgatissima abundance. Female egg-laying and larval performance (growth and survival) were studied on caged willow branches in the field to investigate if plant quality differs between S. cinerea trees growing in forest and farmland habitats. The survival of eggs exposed to natural enemies was examined to see if predation could explain the low abundance of leaf beetles on farmland willows. The results indicated no difference in plant quality; female egg laying and larval performance did not differ between the forest and the farmland. However, heteropteran predators (true bugs) were more abundant, and the survival of eggs was lower, on plants in the farmland habitat than in the forest habitat. The data suggest that the low abundance of P. vulgatissima on farmland willows could not be explained by a poor quality of plants, but more likely by high predation from heteropterans.

Keywords

bottom-upHeteropteraPhratora vulgatissimaSalix cinereatop-down
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 96 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 629 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azerfegne, F., Solbreck, C. & Ives, A.R. (2001) Environmental forcing and high amplitude fluctuations in the population dynamics of the tropical butterfly Acraea acerata (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of Animal Ecology 70, 1032–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. 312 pp. New York, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A.A. (Ed.) (1988) Dynamics of forest insect populations: patterns, causes, implications. 624 pp. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, C. & Eklund, K. (2006) Factors affecting willow leaf beetles ( Phratora vulgatissima ) when selecting overwintering sites. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 8, 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, C., Kytö, M., Larsson, S. & Niemelä, P. (1998) Different responses of two carbon-based defences in Scots pine needles to nitrogen fertilization. Ecoscience 5, 502–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, C., Bengtsson, B. & Häggström, H. (2000) Localized outbreak of a willow leaf beetle: plant vigor or natural enemies? Population Ecology 42, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, C., Dalin, P. & Eklund, K. (2003) Generalist natural enemies of a willow leaf beetle ( Phratora vulgatissima ): abundance and feeding habits. Journal of Insect Behaviour 16, 747–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björkman, C., Bommarco, R., Eklund, K. & Höglund, S. (2004) Harvesting disrupts biological control of herbivores in a short-rotation coppice system. Ecological Applications 14, 1624–1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, J.M. (1996) Abiotic controls of trophic cascades in a simple grassland food chain. Oikos 77, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalin, P. (2004) Food-web interactions and population variability of leaf beetles in managed and natural willow stands. PhD thesis, Silvestria 303. Uppsala, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Glynn, C., Rönnberg-Wästljung, A.-C., Julkunen-Tiitto, R. & Weih, M. (2004) Willow genotype, but not drought treatment, affects foliar phenolic concentrations and leaf-beetle resistance. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 113, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, C. & Denno, R.F. (2003) Seasonal shift from bottom-up to top-down impact in phytophagous insect populations. Oecologia 134, 487–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hairston, N.G., Smith, F.E. & Slobodkin, L.B. (1960) Community structure, population control, and competition. American Naturalist 94, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, B.A. (2001) Top-down and bottom-up forces in the population and community ecology of insects. Basic and Applied Ecology 2, 293–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsell, B. (Ed.) (2000) Flora Nordica. 368 pp. Stockholm, Bergius Foundation.Google Scholar
Kelly, M.T. & Curry, J.P. (1991) The influence of phenolic compounds on the suitability of three Salix species as hosts for the willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 61, 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, D.A. & Wiltshire, C.W. (1998) Life-cycles and ecology of willow leaf beetles on Salix viminalis in England. European Journal of Forest Pathology 28, 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, D.A., Hunter, T., Arnold, G.M., Liggitt, J., Morris, T. & Wiltshire, C.W. (1996a) Susceptibility of willow clones ( Salix spp.) to herbivory by Phyllodecta vulgatissima (L.) and Galerucella lineola (Fab.) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Annals of Applied Biology 129, 379–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, D.A., Wiltshire, C.W. & Butcher, M. (1996b) Phenology and population dynamics of willow leaf beetles (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae) in short-rotation coppiced willows at Long- Ashton. ETSU (DTI) Biofuels Study B/M4/00487/14/REP. Bristol, IACR Long Ashton Research Station.Google Scholar
Kidd, N.A.C. & Jervis, M.A. (1997) The impact of parasitoids and predators on forest insect populations. pp. 49–68 in Watt, A.S., Stork, N.E. & Hunter, M.D. (Eds) Forests and insects. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Kolehmainen, J., Julkunen-Tiitto, R., Roininen, H. & Tahvanainen, J. (1995) Phenolic glycosides as feeding cues for willow-feeding leaf beetles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koricheva, J., Larsson, S., Haukioja, E. & Keinänen, M. (1998) Regulation of woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis testing by means of meta-analysis. Oikos 83, 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, S., Ekbom, B. & Björkman, C. (2000) Influence of plant quality on pine sawfly population dynamics. Oikos 89, 440–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louda, S.M., Farris, M.A. & Blua, M.J. (1987) Variation in methylglucosinolate and insect damage to Cleome serrulata (Capparaceae) along a natural soil moisture gradient. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13, 569–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lower, S.L., Kirshenbaum, S. & Orians, C.M. (2003) Preference and performance of a willow-feeding leaf beetle: soil nutrients and flooding effects on host quality. Oecologia 136, 402–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maisner, N. (1974) Chrysomelidae, Blattkäfer. pp. 202–236 in Schwenke, W. (Ed.) Die Forstschädlinge Europas, vol. 2. Hamburg, Parey.Google Scholar
Maron, J.L., Harrison, S. & Greaves, M. (2001) Origin of an insect outbreak: escape in space or time from natural enemies? Oecologia 126, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öberg, S. (2002) Interactions between two ladybird species attacking a host alternating aphid. Master thesis, 52, Department of Ecology and Crop Production Science, Uppsala, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Olsson, U. (2002) Generalized linear models – an applied approach. 232 pp. Lund, Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Peacock, L., Lewis, M. & Herrick, S. (2001) Factors influencing the aggregative response of the blue willow beetle, Phratora vulgatissima. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 98, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacock, L., Harris, J. & Powers, S. (2004) Effects of host variety on blue willow beetle Phratora vulgatissima performance. Annals of Applied Biology 144, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preszler, R.W. & Boecklen, W.J. (1996) The influence of elevation on tri-trophic interactions: opposing gradients of top-down and bottom-up effects on a leaf-mining moth. Ecoscience 3, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rank, N.E., Köpf, A., Julkunen-Tiitto, R. & Tahvanainen, J. (1998) Host preference and larval performance of the salicylate-using leaf beetle Phratora vitellinae. Ecology 79, 618–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, D.F. (1983) Herbivore population dynamics and plant chemistry. pp. 155–220 in Denno, R.F. & McClure, M.S. (Eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. New York, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonhoven, L.M., Jermy, T. & van Loon, J.J.A. (1998) Insectplant biology. 409 pp. London, Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sipura, M. (2002) Contrasting effects of ants on the herbivory and growth of two willow species. Ecology 83, 2680–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sipura, M., Ikonen, A., Tahvanainen, J. & Roininen, H. (2002) Why does the leaf beetle Galerucella lineola F. attack wetland willows?. Ecology 83, 3393–3407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiling, P. & Moon, D. (2005) Are trophodynamic models worth their salt? Top-down and bottom-up effects along a salinity gradient. Ecology 86, 1730–1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symondson, W.O.C., Sunderland, K.D. & Greenstone, M.H. (2002) Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 561–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, M. & Jones, T.H. (2001) Relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces in terrestrial tritrophic plant–insect herbivore–natural enemy systems. Oikos 93, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edn. 663 pp. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar