Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:03:06.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immature Nutfall of Coconuts in the Solomon Islands.

I.—Distribution of Nutfall in Relation to that of Amblypelta and of certain Species of Ants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

E. S. Brown
Affiliation:
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology.

Extract

In the British Solomon Islands Protectorate, the incidence of the immature nutfall of coconuts that is caused by species of Amblypelta depends upon the distribution of (1) the species that are concerned, which determines on what islands nutfall occurs, and (2) certain species of ants, which affects the local distribution of nutfall on those islands. A. cocophaga China is the most important member of the genus as regards responsibility for nutfall; A. cristobalensis Brown and to a less extent A. costalis Van Duzee also frequent the coconut palm and cause nutfall, but not on a serious scale; A. gallegonis Lever rarely, if ever, attacks coconut.

The current view that Oecophylla smaragdina (F.) protects coconuts against Amblypelta, and that Pheidole megacephala (F.) and Iridomyrmex myrmecodiae Emery give little or no protection, is accepted, but evidence is brought forward showing that Iridomyrmex appears to give some protection against A. cristobalensis on San Cristobal. Most attention has been given to a fourth species of ant, Anoplolepis longipes (Jerd.), the relation of which to nutfall has hitherto been in some doubt; evidence from various sources shows that, at least on Guadalcanal and Malaita, it gives nearly, if not quite, as much protection against Amblypelta as Oecophylla does.

A method based on crop estimation is used to give some indication of the losses due to nutfall in the European plantations that have been surveyed. The accuracy of the method is discussed in an Appendix. Varying numbers of nuts survive to maturity in nutfall areas, depending on the intensity of attack. In addition to the loss caused by the failure of nuts to survive to maturity, Amblypelta attack causes further losses by reducing the amount of copra obtainable from surviving nuts, and by rendering plantations where the attack is sufficiently severe unprofitable to work, so that they become, in effect, a total loss, even though a proportion of the nuts may survive attack.

An attempt is made to evaluate and compare the fraction of the crop lost on some of the principal islands, but it is impossible to give an even approximately accurate figure for the losses due to nutfall in the islands as a whole, because essential data, comprising the planted acreage of each plantation and island, and, except for a very few plantations, details of annual production figures over a period of years, are often lacking; also, limited time has made it impossible to survey many of the plantations in sufficient detail for an accurate assessment of nutfall.

A list is given of the species of ants recorded from coconut plantations during the present work.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, E. S. (1958 a). Revision of the genus Amblypelta Stål (Hemiptera, Coreidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 509541.Google Scholar
Brown, E. S. (1958 b). Injury to cacao by Amblypelta Stål (Hemiptera, Coreidae) with a summary of food-plants of species of this genus.—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 543554.Google Scholar
Mann, W. M. (1919). The ants of the British Solomon Islands.—Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 63 pp. 273391.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. A. (1950). Premature nutfall of coconuts in the British Solomon Islands Protectorate.—Agric. J. Fiji 21 pp. 2142.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. S. (1956). Immature nutfall of coconuts in the British Solomon Islands Protectorate.—Bull. ent. Res. 47 pp. 575595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanderplank, F. L. (1958). Studies on the coconut pest, Pseudotheraptus wayi Brown (Coreidae), in Zanzibar. I. A method of assessing the damage caused by the insect.—Bull. ent. Res. 49 pp. 559584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M. J. (1951). An insect pest of coconuts and its relationship to certain ant species.—Nature, Lond. 168 p. 302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Way, M. J. (1953). Studies on Theraptus sp. (Coreidae); the cause of the gumming disease of coconuts in East Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 44 pp. 657667.Google Scholar