Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:50:26.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infection, growth and maintenance of Wolbachia pipientis in clonal and non-clonal Aedes albopictus cell cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2012

C.C.H. Khoo ,
C.M.P. Venard ,
Y. Fu ,
D.R. Mercer  and
S.L. Dobson
C.C.H. Khoo*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
C.M.P. Venard
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
Y. Fu
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
D.R. Mercer
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
S.L. Dobson
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546, USA
*
* Author for correspondence Fax: 970-491-8707 E-mail: ckhoo@colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Insect cell lines provide useful in vitro models for studying biological systems, including interactions between mosquitoes and obligate intracellular endosymbionts such as Wolbachia pipientis. The Aedes albopictus Aa23 cell line was the first cell line developed to allow examination of Wolbachia infections. However, Wolbachia studies using Aa23 can be complicated by the presence of different cell types in the cell line and the substantial temporal variation in infection level. Two approaches were examined to ameliorate infection variability. In the first approach, multiple Aa23 passaging regimes were tested for an effect on infection variability. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) staining was used to characterize Wolbachia infection level over time. The results demonstrate an impact of passaging method on Wolbachia infection level, with some methods resulting in loss of infection. None of the passaging methods succeeded in effectively mitigating infection level variation. In a second approach, the clonal C7-10 A. albopictus cell line was infected with Wolbachia from Aa23 cells and Drosophila simulans (Riverside), resulting in cell lines designated C7-10B and C7-10R, respectively. Characterization via FISH staining showed greater stability and uniformity of Wolbachia infection in C7-10R relative to the infection in C7-10B. Characterization of the Aa23, C7-10B and C7-10R lines is discussed as a tool for the study of Wolbachia-host cell interactions.

Keywords

mosquito cell cultureintracellular bacteriaAa23 cellsC7-10 cellsFISH
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 251 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agathos, S.N., Jeong, Y.H. & Venkat, K. (1990) Growth kinetics of free and immobilized insect cell cultures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 589, 372–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandi, C., McCall, J.W., Genchi, C., Corona, S., Venco, L. & Sacchi, L. (1999) Effects of tetracycline on the filarial worms Brugia pahangi and Dirofilaria immitis and their bacterial endosymbionts Wolbachia . International Journal for Parasitology 29, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, W.E., Maglova, L.M., Ponka, P. & Russell, J.M. (2004) Human cytomegalovirus-induced host cell enlargement is iron dependent. American Journal of Physiology – Cell Physiology 287, 1023–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, S.L., Marsland, E.J., Veneti, Z., Bourtzis, K. & O'Neill, S.L. (2002) Characterization of Wolbachia host cell range via the in vitro establishment of infection. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68, 656–660.Google Scholar
Fallon, A.M. (2008) Cytological properties of an Aedes albopictus mosquito cell line infected with Wolbachia strain wAlbB. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Animal 44, 154–161.Google Scholar
Fenollar, F., La Scola, B., Inokuma, H., Dumler, J.S., Taylor, M.J. & Raoult, D. (2003a) Culture and phenotypic characterization of a Wolbachia pipientis isolate. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41, 5434–5441.Google Scholar
Fenollar, F., Maurin, M. & Raoult, D. (2003b) Wolbachia pipientis growth kinetics and susceptibilities to 13 antibiotics determined by immunofluorescence staining and real-time PCR. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 47, 1665–1671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garner-Hamrick, P.A. & Fisher, C. (2002) HPV episomal copy number closely correlated with cell size in keratinocyte monolayer cultures. Virology 301, 334–341.Google Scholar
Gerenday, A. & Fallon, A.M. (1996) Cell cycle parameters in Aedes albopictus mosquito cells. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Animal 32, 307–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heddi, A., Grenier, A., Khatchadourian, C., Charles, H. & Nardon, P. (1999) Four intracellular genomes direct weevil biology: Nuclear, mitochondrial, principal endosymbiont, and Wolbachia . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 6814–6819.Google Scholar
Hermans, P.G., Hart, C.A. & Trees, A.J. (2001) In vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis . Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 47, 659–663.Google Scholar
Hertig, M. (1936) The rickettsia Wolbachia pipientis (gen. et. sp. n) and associated inclusions of the mosquito, Culex pipiens . Parasitology 28, 453–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoerauf, A., Nissen-Pähle, K., Schmetz, C., Henkle-Dührsen, K., Blaxter, M.L., Büttner, D.W., Gallin, M.Y., Al-Qaoud, K.M., Lucius, R. & Fleischer, B. (1999) Tetracycline therapy targets intracellular bacteria in the filarial nematode Litomosoides sigmodontis and results in filarial infertility. Journal of Clinical Investigation 103, 11–18.Google Scholar
Hopps, H.E., Jackson, E.B., Danauskas, J.X. & Smadel, J.E. (1959) Study on the growth of Rickettsiae III. Influence of extracellular environment on the growth of Rickettsia tsutsugamushi in tissue culture cells. Journal of Immunology 82, 161–171.Google Scholar
Jeyaprakash, A. & Hoy, M.A. (2000) Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty-three arthropod species. Insect Molecular Biology 9, 393–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langworthy, S., Renz, A., Mackenstedr, U., Henkle-Dührsen, K., de Bronsvoort, M.B., Tanya, V.N., Donnelly, M.J. & Trees, A.J. (2000) Macrofilaricidal activity of tetracycline against the filarial nematode, Onchocerca ochengi: elimination of Wolbachia preceeds worm death and suggests a dependent relationship. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 267, 1063–1069.Google Scholar
Lo, N., Paraskevopoulos, C., Bourtzis, K., O'Neill, S.L., Werren, J.H., Bordenstein, S.R. & Bandi, C. (2007) Taxonomic status of the intracellular bacterium Wolbachia pipientis . International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 57, 654–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makepeace, B.L., Rodgers, L. & Trees, A.J. (2006) Rate of elimination of Wolbachia pipientis by doxycycline in vitro increases following drug withdrawal. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 50, 922–927.Google Scholar
Nouri, N. & Fallon, A.M. (1987) Pleiotropic changes in cycloheximide-resistant insect cell clones. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Animal 23, 175–180.Google Scholar
O'Neill, S.L., Giordano, R., Colbert, A.M.E., Karr, T.L. & Robertson, H.M. (1992) 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial endosymbionts associated with cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89, 2699–2702.Google Scholar
O'Neill, S.L., Pettigrew, M.M., Sinkins, S.P., Braig, H.R., Andreadis, T.G. & Tesh, R.B. (1997) In vitro cultivation of Wolbachia pipientis in an Aedes albopictus cell line. Insect Molecular Biology 6, 33–39.Google Scholar
Ruang-areerate, T., Kittayapong, P., McGraw, E.A., Baimai, V. & O'Neill, S.L. (2004) Wolbachia replication and host cell division in Aedes albopictus . Current Microbiology 49, 10–12.Google Scholar
Singh, K.R.P. (1967) Cell cultures derived from larvae of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) and Aedes aegypti (L.). Current Science 36, 506–508.Google Scholar
Sinkins, S.P. & Gould, F. (2006) Gene-drive system for insect disease vectors. Nature Reviews Genetics 7, 427–435.Google Scholar
Sinkins, S.P., Braig, H.R. & O'Neill, S.L. (1995) Wolbachia pipientis: Bacterial density and unidirectional cytoplasmic incompatibility between infected populations of Aedes albopictus . Experimental Parasitology 81, 284–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tram, U., Ferree, P.M. & Sullivan, W. (2003) Identification of Wolbachia-host interacting factors through cytological analysis. Microbes and Infection 5, 999–1011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voronin, D., Tran-Van, V., Potier, P. & Mavingui, P. (2009) Transinfection and growth discrepancy of Drosophila Wolbachia strain wMel in cell lines of the mosquito Aedes albopictus . Journal of Applied Microbiology 108, 2133–2141.Google Scholar
Walker, T., Johnson, P.H., Moreira, L.A., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Frentiu, F.D., McMeniman, C.J., Leong, Y.S., Dong, Y., Axford, J., Kriesner, P., Lloyd, A.L., Ritchie, S.A., O'Neill, S.L. & Hoffmann, A.A. (2011) The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations. Nature 476, 450–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xi, Z. & Dobson, S.L. (2005) Characterization of Wolbachia transfection efficiency by using microinjection of embryonic cytoplasm and embryo homogenate. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71, 3199–3204.Google Scholar
Xi, Z., Dean, J.L., Khoo, C. & Dobson, S.L. (2005) Generation of a novel Wolbachia infection in Aedes albopictus (Asian tiger mosquito) via embryonic microinjection. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35, 903–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, W., Rousset, F. & O'Neill, S.L. (1998) Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 265, 509–515.Google Scholar