Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:18:17.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infestation of young rice plants by the rice gall midge, Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason) (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae), with special reference to shoot morphogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Nalini Perera  and
Henry E. Fernando
Nalini Perera
Affiliation:
Central Agricultural Research Institute, Peradeniya, Ceylon
Henry E. Fernando
Affiliation:
Central Agricultural Research Institute, Peradeniya, Ceylon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Infestations of the rice gall midge Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason) in Ceylon were studied in 1968. The three larval instars, the prepupa and pupa are described. Total development time is 18–22 days. Dissection of infested rice seedlings showed that first-instar larvae move in 6–12 h from the leaves where they hatch to the shoot apices to which they are specifically attracted, without boring into plant tissues. Larvae feed at the base of the growth cone throughout their development; if more than one larva reaches a shoot apex only one individual survives to maturity. Gall formation results from suppression of the growth cone, development of radial ridges from the innermost leaf primordium just above the level of the posterior end of the larva, and then an elongation of the leaf sheath. Death of the larva, achieved experimentally by means of diazinon or fenitrothion applied to the soil, up to and including instar 2 was followed by renewed activity of the growth cone, but after the same treatment during instar 3 the growth cone was not re-activated. The development of the gall is seen as being due to diversion of nutrients from the growth cone to the midge larva, and possibly by substances produced by the first-instar larva and prepupa which stimulate growth of the radial ridges and gall elongation, respectively. Firstinstar larvae develop only in active shoot apices; thus development proceeds normally in the terminal apex, but is inhibited in the inactive axillary shoot apices. Under high population pressure all shoot apices become infested, but larval dormancy results in staggered gall formation and adult emergence. Larval dormancy in inactive axillary shoot apices may explain seasonal carry-over of the pest.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 4 , April 1970 , pp. 605 - 613
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cosens, A. (1912). A contribution to the morphology and biology of insect galls.—Trans. R. Can. Inst. 9, 297–387.Google Scholar
Deoras, P. J. (1945). Gall formation in paddy.—Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (B) 21 no. 1, 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegdekatti, R. M. (1928). The rice gall midge in north Kanara.—Agric. J. India 22 (1927), 461–163.Google Scholar
Küster, E. (1911). Die Gallen der Pflanzen.—437 pp. Leipzig, Hirel.Google Scholar
Ladell, W. R. S. (1933). Insects injurious to rice in Siam.—J. Siam Soc. (Nat. Hist. Suppl.) 9 no. 2, 161–172.Google Scholar
La Rue, C. D. (1935). The role of auxin in the development of intumescences on poplar leaves, in the production of cell outgrowths in the tunnels of leaf miners and in leaf fall in Coleus.—Am. J. Bot. 22, 908.Google Scholar
Li, Ching-sing & Chiu, Sin-foon (1951). A study of the rice gall midge Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood Mason). [In Chinese with English summary]—Agric. Res., Taipei 2 no. 4, 1–13.Google Scholar
Perera, N. & Fernando, H. E. (1969). Laboratory culture of the rice gall midge Pachydiplosis oryzae (Wood-Mason).—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar