Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:27:43.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of egg load and oviposition time interval on the host discrimination and offspring survival of Anagyrus pseudococci (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), a solitary endoparasitoid of citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2010

K.S. Islam  and
M.J.W. Copland
K.S. Islam
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
M.J.W. Copland*
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Wye College, University of London, Wye, Ashford, Kent, TN25 5AH, UK
*
*Fax: 01233 812855 E-mail: m.copland@wye.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Oviposition and host discrimination behaviour of unmated Anagyrus pseudococci(Girault), an endoparasitoid of the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri (Risso), were investigated in the laboratory. Female parasitoids were able to discriminate between parasitized hosts and healthy ones. The mean number of ovipositions was significantly higher in unparasitized than in parasitized hosts. Conspecific-superparasitism occurred more often than self-superparasitism. Changes in consecutive ovipositions over three hours by A. pseudococci suggested that egg load influenced the discrimination behaviour of the parasitoids, with females which had low egg loads mostly avoiding oviposition in already parasitized hosts at time intervals ranging from 0 h to 96 h, and distributing their eggs in the high quality (unparasitized) hosts. The parasitized hosts were rejected more commonly through antennal perception of external markers than during ovipositor probing which could have encountered internal markers but this relationship changed with increasing time after oviposition. The parasitoid‘s oviposition rate in unparasitized and conspecific-parasitized hosts varied at the different oviposition time intervals when the females had fewer eggs in the ovaries. Percentage emergence of parasitized offspring was not significantly influenced by whether they developed in single or superparasitized mealybugs. The significance of host discrimination by A. pseudococci is discussed.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 90 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 69 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askew, R.R. (1968) A survey of leafminers and their parasites on laburnum. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 120, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, K., Van Alphen, J.J.M., Van Batenburg, F.H.D., Van Der Hoeven, N., Nell, H.W., Van Strien-Van Liempt, W.T.F.H. & Turlings, T.C.J. (1985) Function of host discrimination and superparasitism in parasitoids. Oecologia 67, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumberg, D., Klein, M. & Mendel, Z. (1995) Response by encapsulation of four mealybug species (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) to parasitization by Anagyrus pseudococci. Phytoparasitica 23, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov, E.L. & Skinner, S.W. (1985) Complementary approaches to the understanding of parasitoid oviposition decisions. Environmental Entomology 14, 383–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chow, F.J. & Mackauer, M. (1986) Host discrimination and larval competition in aphid parasite Ephedrus californicus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 41, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.C. (1971) Aspects of physiology of endoparasitic Hymenoptera. Biological Review 46, 243–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofsvang, T. (1988) Mechanism of host discrimination and intraspecific competition in the aphid parasitoid Ephedrus cerasicola. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 48, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, S.F., Marris, G.C., Reynolds, A.R. & Rowe, G.W. (1987) Adaptive pattern in the avoidance of superparasitism by solitary insect parasitoids. Journal of Animal Ecology 56, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, K.S. & Copland, M.J.W. (1997) Host preference and sex ratio in a solitary koinobiont mealybug endoparasitoid, Anagyrus pseudococci (Girault) in response to its host stage. Biocontrol Science and Technology 7, 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, K.S., Perera, H.A.S. & Copland, M.J.W. (1997) The effects of parasitism by an encyrtid parasitoid, Anagyrus pseudococci on the survival, reproduction and physiological changes in the mealybug, Planococcus citri. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 84, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, Y., Suzuki, Y. & Matsuda, H. (1984) Theory of oviposition strategy of parasitoids. I. Effects of mortality and limited egg number. Theoretical Population Biology 26, 205–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackauer, M. (1990) Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. pp. 41–62 in Mackauer, M., Ehler, L.E. & Ronald, J. (Eds) Critical issues in biological control. Andover, Intercept.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, O.P.J.M., Tatar, M. & Rosenheim, J.A. (1992) Egg load as a major source of variability in insect foraging and oviposition behaviour. Oikos 65, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. (1988) Agents used for biological control of mealybugs (Pseudococcidae). Biocontrol News and Information 9, 209–225.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. (1975) A model for avoidance of superparasitism by solitary insect parasitoids. Journal of Animal Ecology 44, 623–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenheim, J.A. & Rosen, D. (1991) Foraging and oviposition decisions in the parasitoid Aphytis lingnanensis: distinguishing the influence of egg load and experience. Journal of Animal Ecology 60, 873–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summy, K.R., French, V.J. & Hart, V.G. (1986) Citrus mealybug, Planococcus citri (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae), on greenhouse citrus: density dependent regulation by an encyrtid parasitoid complex. Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 891–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingle, C.C.D. & Copland, M.J.W. (1988) Predicting development of the mealybug parasitoids Anagyrus pseudococci, Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptomastidea abnormis under glasshouse conditions. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 46, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingle, C.C.D. & Copland, M.J.W. (1989) Progeny production and adult longevity of the mealybug parasitoids Anagyrus pseudococci, Leptomastix dactylopii and Leptomastidea abnormis (Hym: Encyrtidae) in relation to temperature. Entomophaga 34, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Alphen, J.J.M. & Jervis, M.A. (1996) Foraging behaviour. pp. 1–62 in Jervis, M. & Kidd, D. (Eds) Insect natural enemies. London, Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Van Alphen, J.J.M. & Nell, H.W. (1982) Superparasitism and host discrimination by Asobara tabida Nees (Braconidae: Alysiinae), a larval parasitoid of Drosophilidae. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 32, 232–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Alphen, J.J.M. & Visser, M.E. (1990) Superparasitism as an adaptive strategy for insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 35, 59–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Baaren, J. & Nenon, J.P. (1996) Intraspecific larval competition in two solitary parasitoids, Apoanagyrus (Epidinocarsis) lopezi and Leptomastix dactylopii. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 81, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijken, M.J. & Waage, J.K. (1987) Self and conspecific superparasitism by the egg parasitoid Trichogramma evanescens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 43, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lenteren, J.C. (1981) Host discrimination by parasitoids. pp. 153–179 in Nordlund, D.A., Jones, R.L. & Lewis, W.J. (Eds) Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. New York, John Wiley.Google Scholar
Vinson, S.B. (1977) Behavioural chemicals in the augmentation of natural enemies. pp. 237–279 in Ridgway, R.L. & Vinson, S.B. (Eds) Biological control by augmentation of natural enemies. New York, Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinson, S.B. & Iwantsch, G.F. (1980) Host suitability of insect parasitoids. Annual Review of Entomology 25, 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkl, W. & Mackauer, M. (1990) Age-specific pattern of host discrimination by the aphid parasitoid Ephedrus californicus Baker (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Canadian Entomologist 122, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waage, J.K. (1986) Family planning in parasitoids: adaptive patterns of progeny sex allocation. pp. 63–95 in Waage, J. & Greathead, D. (Eds) Insect parasitoids. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, H.G. (1965) Discrimination between parasitized and unparasitized housefly by females of Nasonia vitripennis (Walk.) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Canadian Entomologist 97, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar