Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:33:58.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laboratory studies of plant searching behaviour by Coccinella septempunctata L. larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

R. J. Marks
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture & Natural Resources, Makoka Research Station, Private Bag 3, Thondwe, Malawi

Abstract

Movements of individual fourth instar Coccinella septempunctata L. larvae on pot-grown broad bean plants in England were recorded continually to assess plant recognition and the effects of prey capture. Prey capture was also studied in a 25X25 cm artificial arena. Approximately 80% of the total distance moved by larvae on plants was along leaf edges and mid-veins. Typical search speeds were 0−38−0−51 cm s−1. An average of only 3−2% of larval search time on plants was spent on leaf laminae on which movement was considerably slower, about 0−15 cm s−1. Discovery of Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) nymphs on plants induced intensive re-searching of the general area of discovery for periods of up to 12 min whereas in the arena the intensive search following prey capture lasted only up to 72 s and was much more localised. Examination of larval search times on plants revealed that 64% and 36% of maximum search times were recorded for the first and for the second or third searches, respectively, in a sequence of searches of the same plant. Only after prey capture was a fourth or subsequent search the longest. Plants previously searched unsuccessfully were recognised by detection of a chemical marker, specific for each individual, secreted via the anal disc during searching. Since C. septempunctata larvae are unable to detect aphids by sight or smell, recognition of areas previously searched unsuccessfully minimises wasteful energy expenditure.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banks, C. J.. (1957). The behaviour of individual Coccinellid larvae on plants.— Br. J. Anim.Behav. 5, 1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansch, R.. (1966). On prey-seeking behaviour of aphidophagous insects, pp. 123128 in Hodek, I. (Ed.) Ecology of aphidophagous insects.— 360 pp. The Hague, Junk.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. E. F.. (1969). Locomotory behaviour of first instar larvae of aphidophagous Syrphidae (Diptera) after contact with aphids.— Anim. Behav. 17, 673678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G.. (1959). An experimental study of the searching behaviour of the predatory Coccinellid beetle Adalia decempunctata (L.).— J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 259281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G.. (1970). Factors limiting the effectiveness of the Coccinellid beetle Adalia bipunctata (L.), as a predator of the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.).— J. Anim. Ecol. 39, 739751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleschner, C. A.. (1950). Studies on the searching capacity of the larvae of three predators of the citrus red mite.— Hilgardia. 20, 233265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J. H.. (1920). Larvae of the Coccinellidae.— Illinois biol. Monogr. 6, 238294.Google Scholar
Marks, R. J.. (1970). A study of interactions in an invertebrate predator-prey system.— M.Sc. thesis, Univ. London.Google Scholar
Murdie, G.. (1971). Simulation of the effects of predator/parasite models on prey/host spatial distribution, pp. 215233 in Patil, G. P.., Pielou, E. C. & Waters, W. E.. (Eds.) Statistical Ecology, 1. Penn. State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. & Marks, R. J.. (1973). Predation by coccinellid beetles: experiments on switching.— Ecology, Brooklyn. 54, 160167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar