Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T09:45:58.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Limits to the host range of the highly polyphagous tephritid fruit fly Anastrepha ludens in its natural habitat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2015

A. Birke ,
E. Acosta  and
M. Aluja
A. Birke*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
E. Acosta
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
M. Aluja
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología A.C., Apartado Postal 63, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +52-228-8421841 Fax: +52-228-8421800 Ext. 4105 E-mail: andrea.birke@inecol.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anastepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a highly polyphagous fruit fly that is able to develop in a wide range of hosts. Understanding the limits of this pest's host range could provide valuable information for pest management and plant breeding for pest resistance. Previous studies have shown that guavas (Psidium guajava (Myrtaceae) L.), are not attacked under natural conditions by A. ludens. To understand this phenomenon, guavas were exposed to natural infestation by A. ludens and to other fruit fly species that infest guavas in nature (Anastrepha striata Schiner, Anastepha fraterculus (Wiedemann), Anastepha obliqua (Macquart)). Once the susceptible phenological stage of guavas was determined, fruit infestation levels were compared between A. ludens and A. striata. Choice and non-choice tests were performed under field-cage conditions. Under field conditions, guavas were susceptible to A. striata and A. fraterculus attack all the way from when fruit was undeveloped to when fruit began to ripen. No infestation by A. ludens was recorded under natural conditions. Similar results were obtained when forced exposures were performed, indicating that unripe guavas were preferred by A. striata over ripe fruit, and that infestation rates were higher at early fruit maturity stages. Under forced oviposition conditions, A. ludens larvae were unable to develop in unripe guavas but did so in fully ripe fruit. However, A. ludens fitness parameters were dramatically affected, exhibiting reduced survival and reduced pupal weight compared to conspecifics that developed in a natural host, grapefruit. We confirm that P. guajava should not be treated as a natural host of this pestiferous species, and suggest that both behavioral aspects and the fact that larvae are unable to adequately develop in this fruit, indeed represent clear limits to A. ludens's broad host range.

Keywords

polyphagyhost rangehost statusTephritidaeAnastrepha ludensAnastrepha striataPsidium guajavaorchard management
Type
Research Papers
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 105 , Issue 6 , December 2015 , pp. 743 - 753
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aluja, M. (1993) Manejo Integrado de la Mosca de la Fruta. Mexico City, Trillas.Google Scholar
Aluja, M. & Birke, A. (1993) Habitat use by adults of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a mixed mango and tropical plum orchard. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86, 799–812.Google Scholar
Aluja, M. & Mangan, R. (2008) Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) host status determination: critical conceptual, methodological, and regulatory considerations. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 473–502.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Guillen, J., de la Rosa, G., Cabrera, M., Celedonio, H., Liedo, P. & Hendrichs, J. (1987) Natural host plant survey of the economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Chiapas, Mexico. Florida Entomologist 70, 329–338.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., López, M. & Sivinski, J. (1998) Ecological evidence for diapause in four native and one exotic species of larval-pupal fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) parasitoids in tropical environments. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91, 821–833.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Pérez-Staples, D., Macías-Ordóñez, R., Piñero, J., McPheron, B. & Hernández-Ortiz, V. (2003) Nonhost status of Citrus sinensis cultivar Valencia and C. paradisi cultivar ‘Ruby Red’ to Mexican Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 1693–1703.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Birke, A., Guillén, L., Díaz-Fleischer, F., Juárez, S. & Nestel, D. (2011) Coping with an unpredictable and stressful environment: the life history and metabolic response to variable food and host availability in a polyphagous tephritid fly. Journal of Insect Physiology 57, 1592–1602.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Arredondo, J., Díaz-Fleischer, F., Birke, A., Rull, J., Niogret, J. & Epsky, N. (2014 a) Susceptibility of 15 mango (Mangifera indica) cultivars to the attack by Anastrepha ludens and A. obliqua and the role of underdeveloped fruit as pest reservoirs: management implications. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 375–388.Google Scholar
Aluja, M., Birke, A., Ceymann, M., Guillén, L., Arrigoni, E., Baumgartner, D., Pascacio, C. & Samietz, J. (2014 b) Agroecosystem resilience to invasive insect species expanding their geographical range in response to global climate change. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 186, 54–63.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J.W. (2001) Quarantine security of bananas at harvest maturity against mediterranean and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. Journal of Economic Entomology 94, 302–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awmack, C.S. & Leather, S.R. (2002) Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47, 817–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, A.C., Stone, W.E., Plummer, C.C. & Mcphail, M. (1944) A review of studies on the Mexican fruit fly and related Mexican species. US. Department of Agriculture Miscellaneous Publication 531, 155.Google Scholar
Bashir, H.A. & Abu-Gouk, A.A. (2003) Compositional changes during guava fruit ripening. Food Chemistry 80, 557–563.Google Scholar
Bernays, E.A. & Chapman, R.F. (1994) Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. New York, Chapman and Hall, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Berrigan, D.A., Carey, J.R., Guillen, J. & Celedonio, H. (1988) Age and host effects on clutch size in the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 47, 73–80.Google Scholar
Birke, A. & Aluja, M. (2011) Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha serpentina (Diptera: Tephritidae) do not infest Psidium guajava (Myrtaceae), but Anastrepha obliqua occasionally shares this resource with Anastrepha striata in nature. Journal of Economic Entomology 104, 1204–1211.Google Scholar
Birke, A., Aluja, M., Greany, P.D., Bigurra, E., Pérez-Staples, D. & McDonald, R. (2006) Long aculeus and behavior of Anastrepha ludens renders gibberellic acid ineffective as an agent to reduce ‘Ruby Red’ grapefruit susceptibility to the attack of this pestiferous fruit fly in commercial groves. Journal of Economic Entomology 99, 1184–1193.Google Scholar
Bisognin, M., Nava, D.E., Diez-Rodríguez, G.I., Valgas, R.A., Garcia, M.S., Krolow, A.C.R. & Antunes, L.E.C. (2015) Development of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae) related to the phenology of blueberry, blackberry, strawberry guava, and surinam cherry fruits. Journal of Economic Entomology DOI: 10.1093/jee/tou002.Google Scholar
Burrack, H.J. & Zalom, F.G. (2008) Olive fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) ovipositional preference and larval performance in several commercially important olive varieties in California. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 750–758.Google Scholar
Conover, W.J. & Iman, R.I. (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. American Statistician 35, 124–133.Google Scholar
Costa, A.M., Amorim, F.O., Anjos-Duarte, C.S. & Joachim-Bravo, I.S. (2011) Influence of different tropical fruits on biological and behavioral aspects of the Mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera, Tephritidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 55, 355–360.Google Scholar
Courtney, S.P., Chen, G.K. & Gardner, A. (1989) A general model for individual host selection. Oikos 55, 55–65.Google Scholar
Da Silva, E., Vendramin, J. & Denardi, F. (2000) Resistencia às Moscas-das-Frutas em Fruteiras. pp. 161–167 in Malavasi, A. & Zucchi, R.A. (Eds) Moscas-das-Frutas de Importância Econômica no Brasil Conhecimiento Básico e Aplicado. Ribeirão Preto, Brasil, Holos Editora.Google Scholar
De Oliveira, F.Q., Junior, A.L.B., Costa, M.D.L.Z., Batista, J.D.L., Costa, K.Z. & Walder, J.M.M. (2015) Infestation of guava by Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae): preferred ripening stages and influence of fruit peel coloration. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 39, 1–9.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. & Raven, H. (1964) Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586–608.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1986 a) The influence of a shortage of hosts on the specificity of oviposition behaviour in species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Physiological Entomology 11, 133–143.Google Scholar
Fitt, G.P. (1986 b) The roles of adult and larval specializations in limiting the occurrence of five species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) in cultivated fruits. Oecologia 69, 101–109.Google Scholar
Fleckinger, J. (1945) Notations phénologiques et représentations graphiques du dévelopment des bourgeons de Poirier. París, C.R. Congr. Ass. Fr. Avanc. Sci.Google Scholar
Gratton, C. & Welter, S.C. (1998) Oviposition preference and larval performance of Liriomyza helianthi (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on normal and novel host plants. Environmental Entomology 27, 926–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, L., Aluja, M., Rull, J., Höhn, V., Schwitzer, T. & Samietz, J. (2011) Influence of walnut cultivar on infestation by Rhagoletis completa: behavioural and management implications. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 140, 207–217.Google Scholar
Jalalulddin, S.M. & Sadakathulla, S. (1999) Development and survival of Bactrocera correcta (Bezzi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on selected guava cultivars. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystem 5, 24–27.Google Scholar
Leyva, J.L., Browning, H.W. & Gilstrap, F.E. (1991) Development of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in several host fruit. Environmental Entomology 20, 1160–1165.Google Scholar
Liquido, N.J., Cunningham, R.T. & Couey, M.H. (1989) Infestation rates of papaya by fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in relation to the degree of fruit ripeness. Journal of Economic Entomology 82, 213–219.Google Scholar
Messina, F.J. & Jones, V.P. (1990) Relationship between fruit phenology and infestation by the apple maggot (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Utah. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83, 742–752.Google Scholar
Norrbom, A.L. (2003) Host Plant Database for Anastrepha and Toxotrypana (Diptera: Tephritidae: Toxotrypanini). Washington, DC, Diptera Data Dissemination Disk (CD-ROM), North American Dipterist's Society.Google Scholar
Opp, S.B. & Prokopy, R.J. (1986) Approaches and methods for direct behavioral observation and analysis of plant-insect interactions. pp. 1–22 in Miller, J.R. & Miller, T.A. (Eds) Insect-Plant Interaction. New York, Springer.Google Scholar
Padilla, R. (2002) Cosecha y Postcosecha. pp. 134–144 in González, E., Padilla, J.S., Reyes, J., Perales, M.A. & Esquivel, F. (Eds) Guayaba: su Cultivo en México. México, INIFAP.Google Scholar
Papachristos, D.P., Papadopoulos, N.T. & Nanos, G.D. (2008) Survival and development of immature stages of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in citrus fruit. Journal of Economic Entomology 101, 866–872.Google Scholar
Pérez, R.M., Mitchell, S. & Vargas, R. (2008) Psidium guajava: a review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 117, 1–27.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Saona, C., Vorsa, N., Singh, A.P., Johnson-Cicalese, J., Szendrei, Z., Mescher, M.C. & Frost, C.J. (2011) Tracing the history of plant traits under domestication in cranberries: potential consequences on anti-herbivore defences. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 2633–2644.Google Scholar
Singer, M.S., Rodrigues, D., Stireman, J.O. III & Carriere, Y. (2004) Roles of food quality and enemy-free space in host use by a generalist insect herbivore. Ecology 85, 2747–2753.Google Scholar
Sivinski, J., Aluja, A. & López, M. (1997) Spatial and temporal distributions of parasitoids of Mexican Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae) within the canopies of fruit trees. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90, 604–610.Google Scholar
Sivinski, J., Aluja, M., Piñero, J. & Ojeda, M. (2004) Novel analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of resource use in a group of tephritid flies of genus Anastrepha . Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97, 504–512.Google Scholar
Stamp, N. (2001) Enemy-free space via host plant chemistry and dispersion: assessing the influence of tri-trophic interactions. Oecologia 128, 153–163.Google Scholar
Statsoft (1998) Statistica, Version 5.1. Tulsa, OK, Statsoft.Google Scholar
Thomas, D.B. (2004) Hot peppers as a host for the Mexican Fruit Fly Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomology 87, 603–608.Google Scholar
Zaka, S.M., Zeng, Z.N., Holford, P. & Beattie, G.A.C. (2010) Repellent effect of guava leaf volatiles on settlement of adults of citrus psylla, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, on citrus. Insect Science 17, 39–45.Google Scholar