Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:13:49.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Megaselia scalaris (Lw.) (Dipt., Phoridae) for the bioassay of organophosphorus insecticides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Syed S. H. Qadri
Syed S. H. Qadri
Affiliation:
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A simple procedure for mass-rearing Megaselia scalaris (Lw.) is described, and the suitability of one-day-old adults for bioassay of organophosphorus insecticides is compared with that of Drosophila melanogaster Mg., and Musca domestica nebulo F. by exposure to films of parathion, dichlorvos and malathion. LC50 values of Megaselia scalaris for parathion and malathion, but not for dichlorvos, were of a different order to those of the other two test insects. Males were more susceptible than females to parathion and malathion. Mixed populations would therefore be useful in bioassay of organophosphorus compounds, but greater sensitivity would be achieved by using males.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 389 - 392
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dewey, J. E. (1955). A bioassay method using Drosophila and some preliminary results from the New York crop absorption studies.—Proc. Conv. natn. Conner's Ass., Chicago, 1–9.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. E. (1958). Utility of bioassay in the determination of pesticide residues.—J. agric. Fd Chem. 6, 274–281.Google Scholar
Fales, J. H., Bodenstein, O. F. & Piquett, P. G. (1952). Effectiveness of allethrin and pyrethrins as sprays against three species of mosquitoes.—J. econ. Ent. 45, 743–744.Google Scholar
Fay, R. W., Sternburg, R. L. & Ernst, A. H. (1952). A device for recording insecticidal knockdown of house flies and evaluating residual deposits.—J. econ. Ent. 45, 288–292.Google Scholar
Fleming, W. E., Coles, L. W. & Maines, W. W. (1951). Biological assay of residues of DDT and chlordane in soil using Macrocentrus ancylivorus as a test insect.—J. econ. Ent. 44, 310–315.Google Scholar
Hoskins, W. M. & Messenger, P. S. (1950). Microbioassay of insecticide residues in plant and animal tissues.—Adv. Chem. Ser. 1, 93–98.Google Scholar
Knutson, H. (1953). Susceptibility of a normal and an inbred strain of Drosophila melanogaster to dieldrin, toxaphene, DDT, and methoxychlor.—J. econ. Ent. 46, 137–141.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. P. (1957). Bioassay of pesticide residues.—Adv. Pest Control Res. 1, 449–496.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. P. & Pankaskie, J. E. (1954). Drosophila, a sensitive insect, for the microbioassay of insecticide residues.—J. econ. Ent. 47, 180–181.Google Scholar
Tew, R. P. & Sillingbourne, J. M. (1961). Pesticide residues on fruit. I. Microbioassay of pesticide residues using the vinegar fly, Drosophila melanogaster.—J. Sci. Fd Agric. 12, 618–623.Google Scholar