Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:30:10.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nocturnal behaviour of adults of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the Sudan Gezira and pest control implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Clive P. Topper
Clive P. Topper
Affiliation:
Ecological Physics Research Group, Cranfield Institute of Technology, Cranfield, Bedford, MK43 0AL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and cage observations were made on Heliothis armigera (Hübner) in the Sudan Gezira to quantify nocturnal patterns of moth emergence, copulation and oviposition and the ages at which copulation and egg-laying occur. The flight activity pattern of males, virgins and inseminated females was assessed for crops with scarce or abundant sources of honeydew or nectar. A pronounced redistribution of moths between crops during the peak flight activity period (18.15-19.30 h) was demonstrated and measured, with the net exchange being approximately balanced. The direction of this movement was dependent upon the attractiveness of crops for feeding or oviposition. Male and female moths developing from larvae reared on groundnuts had significantly shorter lifespans when fed only water and less fat-body at emergence than moths developing from larvae reared on sorghum. When offered sugar solution, lifespans were significantly greater and differences in the lifespan of moths from groundnuts or sorghum were no longer evident. Adult feeding appears to compensate for any deficiencies associated with a larval diet of groundnut. Feeding was important for adult survival; there was a strong attraction of moths to crops with plentiful honeydew or nectar. A descriptive behavioural model is presented for the first half of adult life, until peak oviposition, and the uses of this model for pest management are discussed.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 541 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balla, A. N. (1970). American bollworm in the Gezira and Managil.—pp. 281–292in Siddig, M. A. & Hughes, L. C. (Eds.). Cotton growth in the Gezira environment.—318 pp. Wad Medani, Sudan, Agric. Res. Corp.Google Scholar
Blaney, W. M. & Simmonds, M. S. J. (1983). Electrophysiological activity in insects in response to antifeedants.—pp. 22–23in Report, Birkbeck College, Univ. London, 12 1983, 219 pp.Google Scholar
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. (1959). A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification.—Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callahan, P. S. (1958). Behavior of the imago of the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie), with special reference to emergence and reproduction.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 51, 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, P. S. & Cascio, T. (1963). Histology of the reproductive tracts and transmission of sperm in the corn earworm, Heliothis zea.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 56, 535–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. V., Ellington, J. J. & Brown, J. C. (1973). Mortality factors affecting cotton insects. I. Resistance of smooth and nectariless characteristics in Acala cotton to Heliothis zea, Pectinophora gossypiella and Trichoplusia ni.—J. Environ. Qual. 2, 530–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eveleens, K. G. (1983). Cotton-insect control in the Sudan Gezira: analysis of a crisis.—Crop Protection 2, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, J. C. (1933). Factors influencing the activities of the cotton bollworm moth (Heliothis obsoleta Fab.).—J. econ. Ent. 26, 957–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackett, D. S. & Gatehouse, A. G. (1978). Larval development of Heliothis armigera (Hb.) on groundnuts, sorghum and cotton in the Sudan Gezira.—pp. 4–16in 3rd seminar on the strategy for cotton pest control in the Sudan, May 1978.—357 pp. Basle, Ciba-Geigy.Google Scholar
Hackett, D. S. & Gatehouse, A. G. (1982). Studies on the biology of Heliothis spp. in Sudan.—pp. 29–38in Reed, W. & Kumble, V. (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Workshop on Heliothis Management, ICRISAT Center, Patancheru, India, 15–20 November 1981.—418 pp. Patancheru, India, Int. Crops Res. Inst. Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Hardwick, D. F. (1965). The corn earworm complex.—Mem. entomol. Soc. Can. no. 40, 247 pp.Google Scholar
Lincoln, C. (1971). Cotton insect control. Molasses and sugar in control programs for the bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie).—pp. 20–22in Matthews, G. A. (Ed.).—Proceedings of the Cotton Insect Control Conference held at Mount Soche Hotel, Blantyre, Malawi, March 24–27th, 1971.—287 pp. Thondwe, Malawi, Agric. Res. Coun. Malawi.Google Scholar
Lincoln, C., Dean, G., Phillips, J. R., Matthews, E. J. & Nelson, G. S. (1966). Molasses-insecticide sprays for control of bollworm.—Arkans. Fm Res. 15, 4.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. A. (1972). Molasses-insecticide sprays for Heliothis control in Malawi.—14 pp. Agric. Res. Coun. Malawi (Occ. Rep. no. 1).Google Scholar
Maxwell, F. G., Schuster, M. F., Meredith, W. R. & Laster, M. L. (1976). Influence of the nectariless character in cotton on harmful and beneficial insects.—Symp. Biol. Hung. 16, 157–161.Google Scholar
Nuttycombe, J. W. (1930). Oviposition of the corn earworm moth in relation to nectar flow of some flowering plants.—J. econ. Ent. 23, 725–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, F. S. & Marshall, J. (1939). Investigations on the American bollworm.—pp. 28–35in Progress reports from experiment stations, season 1937–1938.—150 pp. London, Emp. Cott. Growing Corp.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. R. & Lincoln, C. (1968). Improved bollworm control with molasses-insecticide sprays.—Arkans. Fm Res. 17, 12.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. R. & Whitcomb, W. H. (1962). Field behavior of the adult bollworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie).—J. Kans. ent. Soc. 35, 242–246.Google Scholar
Quaintance, A. L. & Brues, C. T. (1905). The cotton bollworm.—Bull. Bur. Ent. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 50, 155 pp.Google Scholar
Roome, R. E. (1975). Activity of adult Heliothis armigera (Hb.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) with reference to the flowering of sorghum and maize in Botswana.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 523–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G. W. (1976). Radar observations of insect flight.—pp. 157–197in Rainey, R. C. (Ed.). Insect flight.—287 pp. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific. (Symp. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. no. 7).Google Scholar
Topper, C. P. (1981). The behaviour and population dynamics of Heliothis armigera (Hb) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in the Sudan Gezira.—Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield Inst. Technol. Bedford, UK.Google Scholar
Topper, C. P. (1987). The dynamics of the adult population of Heliothis armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) within the Sudan Gezira in relation to cropping pattern and pest control on cotton.—Bull. ent. Res. 77, 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, J. P. (1968). Preliminary trial of the addition of molasses to insecticides.—Cott. Grow. Rev. 45, 198–206.Google Scholar