Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:38:04.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On three new species of Gamasid mites found on rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Stanley Hirst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , September 1913 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 119 note * P. Mégnin's “Parasites et Maladies Parasitaires” (1880) and Prof. L. G. Neumann's “ Treatise on the Parasites and Parasitic Diseases of Domesticated Animals ” (English Edition, 1892). Neumann has also published an account of a case in which Laelaps stabularis, Koch, was found in great numbers in a house and seriously affected the health of one of the inmates (C. R. Soc. Biol. (9) v, 1893, p. 161). See also my little paper “ On two new Parasitic Acari of the genus Leiognathus, Cn.” (Bull. Ent. Res. iii, 1912, p. 369). A number of instances of the Gamasid parasites of rats and birds making attacks on human beings in Australia are given by Dr. J. Burton Cleland in an interesting paper entitled “Injuries and Diseases of Man in Australia attributable to animals (except insects) ” (J. Trop. Med. xvi, no. 3, 1913, p. 43).

page 119 note † Arch. Parasit., Paris, viii, 1904, p. 342.Google Scholar

page 119 note ‡ Washington, D. C., Treas. Dept.. Pub. Hlth. Mar. Hosp. Serv., Hyg. Lab., Bull. no. 46, 1908, p. 25.Google Scholar

page 124 note * Ent. Ber. Nederland Ver. III, 1912, p. 262.Google Scholar