Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:08:48.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiological reactions of Pinus radiata to attack by woodwasp, Sirex noctilio F. (Hymenoptera: Siricidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. L. Madden
Affiliation:
C. S. I. R. O. Division of Entomology, Stowell Avenue, Battery Point, Tasmania, 7000, Australia

Abstract

Abstract

Physiological studies of Pinus radiata damaged artificially and of others attacked by Sirex noctilio F. indicated that temporary disturbances of the normal physiology of the host trees produce potential breeding sites for the woodwasp. Different physiological processes within trees were monitored after treatment and attack; these included changes in trans-location, transpiration, phloem respiration and osmotic and moisture content. The response of the S. noctilio to trees baited with phloem extracts or monoterpene solutions was investigated. The results of these studies, together with the published findings of other workers on the effects of insect secretions on trees and the resistance phenomenon, were interpreted into a general hypothesis of the interaction of the insect with the host tree. It was found that damage impaired translocation and enhanced transpiration and phloem respiration. These changes resulted in changes in tissue permeability and increased the rates of monoterpene and water vapour loss through the bark. The attraction of S. noctilio to trees was related to these changes, and the lowered osmotic status of the phloem favoured egg deposition. Drilling also was accompanied by the secretion of arthrospores of the symbiotic fungus Amylostereum areolatum and mucus, which inhibited translocation. High water tensions in stressed trees favoured fungus invasion, and low turgor resulting from the permeability changes minimised resinosis at oviposition sites. Successful establishment of the fungus, together with the effects of the mucus, resulted in tree death and the creation of a suitable milieu for Sirex development. The hypothesis proposes that the outcome of any attack is related to the duration and effects of the initial stressor on the tree and the tree's ability to moderate these effects. The response in the physiology of individual trees to stress affects the probability of attack while the resultant interaction between insect and tree determines the intensity of drilling, arthrospore and mucus load, and tree susceptibility or resistance to that attack.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett-Clark, T. A.. (1959). Water relations of cells. pp. 105–191 in Steward, F. C.. (Ed.) Plant Physiology. Vol. 2.— 1st edn, 758 pp. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bordeaux, P. F.. & Schopmeyer, C. S.. (1957). Oleoresin pressure in slash pine. pp. 313319 in Thimann, K. V.. (Ed.). The physiology of forest trees.— 678 pp. Harvard forest symposium, New York, Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Coutts, M. P.. (1968). Rapid physiological change in Pinus radiata following attack by Sirex noctilio and its associated fungus, Amylostereum sp.— Aust. J. Sci. 30, 275276.Google Scholar
Coutts, M. P.. (1969a). The mechanism of pathogenicity of Sirex noctilio on Pinus radiata. I. Effects of the symbiotic fungus, Amylostereum sp. (Thelaphoraceae).— Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22, 915924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutts, M. P.. (1969b). The mechanism of pathogenicity of Sirex noctilio on Pinus radiata. II. Effects of S. noctilio mucus.— Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 22, 11531161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutts, M. P.. & Dolezal, J. E.. (1966a). Polyphenols and resin in the resistance mechanism of Pinus radiata attacked by the wood wasp, Sirex noctilio, and its associated fungus.— Leafi. Commonw. For. Tintb. Bur., Canberra No. 101, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Coutts, M. P.. & Dolezal, J. E.. (1966b). Some effects of bark cincturing on the physiology of Pinus radiata, and on Sirex attack.— Aust. For. Res. 2, 1728.Google Scholar
Fong, L. K.. & Crowden, R. K.. (1973). Physiological effects of mucus from the wood wasp, Sirex noctilio F., on the foliage of Pinus radiata D. Don.— Aust. J. biol. Sci. 26, 365378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritts, H. C.. & Fritts, E. C.. (1955). A new dendrograph for recording radial changes of a tree.— Forest Sci. 1, 271.Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. M.. & Miller, L. W.. (1952). An outbreak of Sirex noctilio in Tasmania.— Aust. J. For. 16, 6369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, H. R.. (1944). Volume measurement of single trees.— Aust. For. 8, 4462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenidge, K. N. H.. (1962). Dendograph patterns in decapitated trees: preliminary observations.— Can. J. Bot. 40, 10631071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D. S.. (1955). The Pinus radiata/Sirex noctilio relationship at Rotoehu Forest.— N.Z. Jl. For. 7, 2641.Google Scholar
Kile, G. A.. & Turnbull, C. R. A.. (1974). The effects of Radiata Pine resin and resin components on the growth of the Sirex symbiont, Amylostereum areolatum.— Aust. For. Res. 6, 2734.Google Scholar
Kile, G. A.., Bowling, P. J.., Dolezal, J. E.. & Bird, T.. (1974). The reaction of Pinus radiata twigs to the mucus of Sirex noctilio in relation to resistance to Sirex attack.— Aust. For. Res. 6, 2534.Google Scholar
MacDougal, D. T.. (1925). Reversible variations in volume, pressure and movement of sap of trees.— 90 pp. Pubn. 365. Washington, D.C. Pubns. Carnegie Instn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, J. L.. (1968). Physiological aspects of host tree favourability for the woodwasp, Sirex noctilio f.— Proc. ecol. Soc. Aust. 3, 147149.Google Scholar
Madden, J. L.. (1971). Some treatments which render Monterey pine (Pinus radiata) attractive to the wood wasp Sirex noctilio f.— Bull. ent. Res. 60, 467472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, J. L.. (1974). Oviposition behaviour of the woodwasp, Sirex noctilio f.— Aust. J. Zool. 22, 341351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, J. L.. (in press). Direct evaluation of cambial activity in trees.— Aust. For. Res.Google Scholar
Moghen, E. W.. (1955). Silvical factors influencing resistance of Ponderosa Pine to Black Hills Beetle attack.— Proc. Am. For. Ass. 50, 6163.Google Scholar
Rawlings, G. B.. (1948). Recent observations on the Sirex noctilio population in Pinus radiata forests in n.z.— N.Z. Jl. For. 5, 411421.Google Scholar
Sacher, J. A.. (1959). Studies on auxin-mebrane permeability relations in fruit and leaf tissues.— Pl. Physiol., Lancaster 34, 365372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schollander, P. F.., Hammell, H. T.., Bradstreet, E. D.. & Hemmingsen, E. A.. (1965). Sap pressure in vascular plants.— Science, N.Y. 148, 339346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spradberry, J. P.. (1973). A comparative study of the phytotoxic effects of siricid wood-wasps on conifers.— Ann. appl. Biol. 75, 309320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbreit, W. W.., Burriss, R. H.. & Stauffer, J. F.. (1957). Manometric techniques and tissue metabolism.— 2nd edn, 338 pp. Minneapolis, Minn., Burgess.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. C.. & Maple, A.. (1965). A technique for measurement of oleoresin exudation pressure in Pinus radiata.— Aust. For. Res. 1, 4144.Google Scholar