Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:27:52.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Investigations on the Biology and Ecology of the Parasites and Predators of Brevicoryne brassicae (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. S. George
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During 1953 and 1954, experimental plots were set up on two sites in eastern England and regular fortnightly samples were taken in an attempt to evaluate the degree of control of the Cabbage Aphid, Brevicoryne brassicae (L.), exerted by its parasites and predators.

The plot at each site consisted of a block of 5 rows of 40 plants and each main sample consisted of a sample of three leaves (one upper, one middle and one lower leaf) from 25 per cent. of the plants. Two such samples (A & B) were taken at each visit and were so arranged that the plants were sampled in strict rotation. The leaves were taken back to the laboratory and sample A was used to assess the number of Aphids, the other for an assessment of parasitism. The Aphids were removed from sample A and put into 95 per cent. alcohol and counted. The mummies were removed from sample B and put into labelled tubes. The leaves from sample B were then kept in insect-proof containers and examined daily for the next fortnight. All mummies which formed were removed and sorted. The insects which emerged from the mummies were killed, sexed and recorded. Predators taken from this sample were identified and recorded and used for further experiments. The validity of counting Aphids from one sample and parasites and predators from another was investigated by a series of “check-samples” taken from arbitrary plots in the fields. A shorter method for assessing parasitism was tried, using a sub-sample of the main sample, and an explanation is given for the disparity between the two sets of results.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , September 1957 , pp. 619 - 629
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Church, B. M. & Strickland, A. H. (1954). Plant Path., 3, pp. 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatenby, J. B. (1919). J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), 33, pp. 387–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, M. D. (1920). Quart. J. micr. Sci., 65, pp. 101–127.Google Scholar
Marcovitch, S. (1935). J. econ. Ent., 28, pp. 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. A. (1899). A monograph of British Braconidae.—Trans. ent. Soc. Lond., 1899, pp. 1–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petherbridge, F. R. & Mellor, J. E. M. (1936). Ann. appl. Biol., 23, pp. 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripper, W. E. (1944). Nature, Lond., 153, pp. 448–452.Google Scholar
Smith, C. F. (1944). The Aphidiinae of North America (Braconidae: Hymenoptera).—154 pp. Columbus, Ohio St. Univ.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1926). Ann. ent. Soc. Amer., 19, pp. 119–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, A. H. (1954). Plant Path., 3, pp. 73–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vevai, E. J. (1942). Parasitology, 34, pp. 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar