Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T13:47:04.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) landing rates on a human subject and numbers captured using CO2-baited light traps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2010

D.R. Barnard ,
G.J. Knue ,
C.Z. Dickerson ,
U.R. Bernier  and
D.L. Kline
D.R. Barnard*
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
G.J. Knue
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
C.Z. Dickerson
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
U.R. Bernier
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
D.L. Kline
Affiliation:
Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
*
*Authors for correspondence Fax: +1 352 374 5870 E-mail: don.barnard@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Capture rates of insectary-reared female Aedes albopictus (Skuse), Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say, Culex nigripalpus Theobald, Culex quinquefasciatus Say and Aedes triseriatus (Say) in CDC-type light traps (LT) supplemented with CO2 and using the human landing (HL) collection method were observed in matched-pair experiments in outdoor screened enclosures. Mosquito responses were compared on a catch-per-unit-effort basis using regression analysis with LT and HL as the dependent and independent variables, respectively. The average number of mosquitoes captured in 1 min by LT over a 24-h period was significantly related to the average number captured in 1 min by HL only for Cx. nigripalpus and Cx. quinquefasciatus. Patterns of diel activity indicated by a comparison of the mean response to LT and HL at eight different times in a 24-h period were not superposable for any species. The capture rate efficiency of LT when compared with HL was ≤15% for all mosquitoes except Cx. quinquefasciatus (43%). Statistical models of the relationship between mosquito responses to each collection method indicate that, except for Ae. albopictus, LT and HL capture rates are significantly related only during certain times of the diel period. Estimates of mosquito activity based on observations made between sunset and sunrise were most precise in this regard for An. quadrimaculatus and Cx. nigripalpus, as were those between sunrise and sunset for Cx. quinquefasciatus and Ae. triseriatus.

Keywords

samplingtrappingbiasdiel activity
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 277 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoo, A.O.J., Xue, R.D., Qualls, W.A., Quinn, B.P. & Bernier, U.R. (2008) Residual efficacy of field-applied permethrin, d-phenthrin, and resmethrin on plant foliage against adult mosquitoes. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 24, 543–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bidlingmayer, W.L. (1985) The measurement of adult mosquito population changes - some considerations. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 1, 328–348.Google ScholarPubMed
Chambers, E.W., McClintock, S.K., Avery, M.F., King, J.D., Bradley, M.H., Schmaedick, M.A., Lammie, P.J. & Burkot, T.R. (2009) Xenomonitoring of Wuchereria bancrofti and Dirofilaria immitis infections in mosquitoes from American Samoa: trapping considerations and a comparison of polymerase chain reaction assays with dissection. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 80, 774–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, C.L. & Reeves, W.C. (1962) Statistical estimation of virus infection rates in mosquito vector populations. American Journal of Hygiene 75, 377–391.Google ScholarPubMed
Costantini, C., Sagnon, N. F., Sanogo, E., Merzagora, L. & Coluzzi, M. (1998) Relationship to human biting collections and influence of light and bednet in CDC light-trap catches of West African malaria vectors. Bulletin of Entomological Research 88, 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J.R., Hall, T., Chee, E.M., Majala, A., Minjas, J. & Shiff, C.L. (1995) Comparison of sampling anopheline mosquitoes by light-trap and human-bait collections indoors at Bagamoyo, Tanzania. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 9, 249–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diuk-Wasser, M.A., Brown, H.E., Andreadis, T.G. & Fish, D. (2006) Modeling the spatial distribution of mosquito vectors for West Nile virus in Connecticut, USA. Vector-Borne and Infectious Diseases 6, 283–295.Google ScholarPubMed
Dye, C. (1986) Vectorial capacity: Must we measure all its components? Parasitology Today 2, 203–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisen, R.J. & Eisen, L. (2008) Spatial modeling of human risk of exposure to vector-borne pathogens based on epidemiological versus arthropod vector data. Journal of Medical Entomology 45, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett-Jones, C. (1964) Prognosis for interruption of malaria transmission through assessment of the mosquito's vectorial capacity. Nature 204, 1173–1175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett-Jones, C. & Magayuka, S.A. (1975) Studies on the natural incidence of Plasmodium and Wuchereria infections in Anopheles in rural East Africa. I - Assessment of densities by trapping hungry female Anopheles gambiae Giles; Species A. WHO/MAL/75.851, WHO/VBC/75.541.Google Scholar
Gerberg, E.J., Barnard, D.R. & Ward, R.A. (1994) Manual for Mosquito Rearing and Experimental Techniques. American Mosquito Control Association Bulletin No. 5 (revised). 98 pp. Lawerence, KS, USA, Allen Press.Google Scholar
Gu, W., Lampman, R. & Novak, R.J. (2003) Problems in estimating mosquito infection rates using minimum infection rate. Journal of Medical Entomology 40, 595–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gunasekaran, K., Jambulingam, P., Sadanandane, C., Sahu, S.S. & Das, P.K. (1994) Reliability of light trap sampling for Anopheles fluviatilis, a vector of malaria. Acta Tropica 58, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hii, J.L., Smith, K.T., Mai, A., Ibam, E. & Alpers, M.P. (2000) Comparison between anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) caught using different methods in a malaria endemic area of Papua New Guinea. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, I.A.H., Pinichpongse, S., Chitprarop, U., Prasittisuk, C. & Schepens, J. (1982) Trials with CDC and Monkwood light traps for sampling malaria vectors in Thailand. WHO/VBC/82.864.Google Scholar
Katholi, C.R. & Unnasch, T.R. (2006) Important experimental parameters for determining infection rates in arthropod vectors using pool screening approaches. American Journal of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene 74, 779–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilpatrick, A.M., Kramer, L.D., Campbell, S.R., Alleyne, E.O., Dobson, A.P. & Daszak, P. (2005) West Nile virus risk assessment and the bridge vector paradigm. Emerging Infectious Disease 11, 425–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, D.L. (2007) Semiochemicals, traps/targets and mass trapping technology for mosquito management. pp. 241–251 in Floore, T.G. (Ed.) Biorational Control of Mosquitoes. American Mosquito Control Association Bulletin No. 7. Lawerence, KS, USA, Allen Press.Google Scholar
Kline, D.L., Patnaude, M. & Barnard, D.R. (2006) Efficacy of four trap types for detecting and monitoring Culex spp. in North Central Florida. Journal of Medical Entomology 43, 1121–1128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, D.L., Allan, S.A., Bernier, U.R. & Welch, C.H. (2007) Evaluation of the enantiomers of 1-octen-3-ol and 1-octyn-3-ol as attractants for mosquitoes associated with a freshwater swamp in Florida, USA. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröckel, U., Rose, A., Eiras, A.E. & Geier, M. (2006) New tools for surveillance of adult yellow fever mosquitoes: comparison of trap catches with human landing rates in an urban environment. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 22, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanciotti, R.S., Kerst, A.J., Nasci, R.S., Godsey, M.S., Mitchell, C.J., Savage, H.M., Komar, N. & Spielman, A. (2000) Rapid detection of West Nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a Taqman reverse transcrittase-PCR assay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 38, 4066–4071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lines, J.D., Curtis, C.F., Wilkes, T.J. & Njunwa, K.J. (1991) Monitoring human-biting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Tanzania with light-traps hund beside mosquito nets. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magbity, E.B., Lines, J.D., Marbiah, M.T., David, K. & Peterson, E. (2002) How reliable are light traps in estimating biting rates of adult Anopheles gambiae s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in the presence of treated bednets? Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbogo, C.N.M., Glass, G.E., Forster, D., Kabiru, E.W., Githure, J.I., Ouma, J.H. & Beier, J.C. (1993) Evaluation of light traps for sampling anopheline mosquitoes in Kilifi, Kenya. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 9, 260–263.Google ScholarPubMed
Moore, C.G., McLean, R.G., Mitchell, C.J., Nasci, R.S., Tsai, T.F., Calisher, C.H., Marfin, A.A., Moore, P.S. & Gubler, D.J. (1993) Guidelines for Arbovirus Surveillance Programs in the United States. 85 pp. Fort Collins, CO, USA, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Morris, R.F. (1960) Sampling insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology 5, 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neter, J., Wasserman, W. & Kutner, M.H. (1983) Applied Linear Regression Models. 547 pp. Homewood, IL, USA, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.Google Scholar
Odetoyinbo, J.A. (1969) Preliminary investigation on the use of a light trap for sampling malaria vectors in The Gambia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 40, 547–560.Google ScholarPubMed
Reisen, W.K. & Pfuntner, J.A. (1987) Effectiveness of five methods for sampling adult Culex mosquitoes in rural and urban habitats in San Bernardino County, California. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 3, 601–606.Google Scholar
Rubio-Palis, Y. & Curtis, C.F. (1992) Evaluation of different methods of catching anopheline mosquitoes in Western Venezuela. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 8, 261–267.Google ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute (2003) Statistical Analysis System 9.1 for Windows. Cary, North Carolina, USA, SAS Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
Service, M.W. (1993) Mosquito Ecology: Field Sampling Methods. 2nd edn. 998 pp. London, UK, Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. & Henderson, P.A. (2000) Ecological Methods. 3rd edn. 575 pp. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Strickman, D., Miller, M.E., Kim, H.C. & Lee, K.W. (2000) Mosquito surveillance in the demilitarized zone, Republic of Korea, during an outbreak of Plasmodium vivax malaria in 1996 and 1997. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 16, 100–113.Google ScholarPubMed
Sudia, W.D. & Chamberlain, R.W. (1962) Battery-operated light trap, an improved model. Mosquito News 22, 126–129.Google Scholar
Vaidyanathan, R. & Edman, J.D. (1997) Sampling with light traps and human bait in epidemic foci for Eastern Equine Encephalomyelitis virus in Southeastern Massachusetts. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 13, 348–355.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, G.M. & Gingrich, J.B. (2007) Comparison of light traps, gravid traps, and resting boxes for West Nile virus surveillance. Journal of Vector Ecology 32, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed