Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:10:20.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproductive traits and number of matings in males and females of Cerambyx welensii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) an emergent pest of oaks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2015

L.M. Torres-Vila*
Affiliation:
Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Agricultura DRMAyE, Gobierno de Extremadura, Avda, Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain
F.J. Mendiola-Diaz
Affiliation:
Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Agricultura DRMAyE, Gobierno de Extremadura, Avda, Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain
Y. Conejo-Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Agricultura DRMAyE, Gobierno de Extremadura, Avda, Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain
Á. Sánchez-González
Affiliation:
Servicio de Sanidad Vegetal, Consejería de Agricultura DRMAyE, Gobierno de Extremadura, Avda, Luis Ramallo s/n, 06800 Mérida, Badajoz, Spain
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +34 924 00 25 30 Fax: +34 924 00 22 80 E-mail: luismiguel.torres@gobex.es, luismiguel.torresvila@gmail.com

Abstract

The longhorn beetle Cerambyx welensii is an emerging pest involved in oak decline episodes, whose damage is increasingly reported in dehesa open woodlands. Knowledge of the reproductive biology of C. welensii is a crucial goal due to its new pest status. In this study, we assess the reproductive traits of both sexes in the laboratory (25°C and 60% relative humidity ). In females, body length was 44.9 ± 0.9 mm (mean ± SE), fecundity 132 ± 12 eggs, fertility 70 ± 1 %, longevity 70 ± 3 days, preoviposition period 2 ± 0.2 days, oviposition period 44 ± 3 days and postoviposition period 19 ± 3 days. Fecundity was positively correlated with female size, longevity and oviposition period. Daily fecundity was 3.0 ± 0.2 eggs/day and showed a fluctuating synovigenic pattern with a slight decreasing trend over time. Egg length was 4.24 ± 0.01 mm and egg volume 8.14 ± 0.04 mm3. Egg size was correlated with female size but the relative size of eggs was larger in smaller females. Incubation time was 13.9 ± 0.1 days and hatching did not depend on egg size. Neonate size was positively correlated with egg length. Females were polyandrous (more than 20 lifetime matings) but multiple mating did not increase fecundity, fertility or longevity. In males, body length was 43.7 ± 0.6 mm and longevity 52 ± 3 days. Unlike with females, longevity was positively correlated with male size. Males were polygynous (up to 30 lifetime matings) but mating history did not affect male longevity. Rather to the contrary, long-lived males mated more times because they had more mating chances. Lastly, C. welensii reproductive traits were compared with those other Cerambycidae species and discussed from an adaptive perspective. Our data will be useful to improve management of C. welensii in order to prevent or mitigate its impact in dehesa woodlands and other oak forests.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adachi, I. (1988) Reproductive biology of the white-spotted longicorn beetle, Anoplophora malasiaca Thomson (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), in citrus trees. Applied Entomology and Zoology 23, 256264.Google Scholar
Akutsu, K. (1985) Studies on biology and control of udo longicorn beetle (Acalolepta luxuriosa Bates). Bulletin of Tokyo Metropolitan Agricultural Experiment Station 18, 172 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
Allen, C.D., Macalady, A.K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D.D., Hogg, E.H., Gonzalez, P., Fensham, R., Zhang, Z., Castro, J., Demidova, N., Lim, J.-H., Allard, G., Running, S.W., Semerci, A. & Cobb, N. (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 660684.Google Scholar
Allison, J.D., Borden, J.H. & Seybold, S.J. (2004) A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology 14, 123150.Google Scholar
Andersen, J. & Nilssen, A.C. (1983) Intrapopulation size variation of free-living and tree-boring Coleoptera. Canadian Entomologist 115, 14531464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnqvist, G. & Nilsson, T. (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60, 145164.Google Scholar
Bense, U. (1995) Longhorn Beetles: Illustrated Key to the Cerambycidae an Vesperidae of Europe. Weikersheim, Germany, Margraf Verlag.Google Scholar
Buse, J., Ranius, T. & Assmann, T. (2008) An endangered longhorn beetle associated with old oaks and its possible role as an ecosystem engineer. Conservation Biology 22, 329337.Google Scholar
Bybee, L.F., Millar, J.G., Paine, T.D., Campbell, K. & Hanlon, C.C. (2004) Effects of temperature on fecundity and longevity of Phoracantha recurva and P. semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology 33, 138146.Google Scholar
Bybee, L.F., Millar, J.G., Paine, T.D. & Hanlon, C.C. (2005) Effects of single versus multiple mates: monogamy results in increased fecundity for the beetle Phoracantha semipunctata. Journal of Insect Behavior 18, 513527.Google Scholar
Carrasco, A. (Ed.) (2009) Procesos de Decaimiento Forestal (la Seca): Situación del Conocimiento. Córdoba, Spain, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar
Del Moral, J., Gallego, M., Nuñez, R. & Chica, V. (1989) Cerambyx cerdo L. un coleóptero parásito de los Quercus spp. de las dehesas extremeñas. Phytoma España 10, 5863.Google Scholar
Eberhard, W.G. (2002) The function of female resistance behavior: intromission by male coercion vs. female cooperation in sepsis flies (Diptera: Sepsidae). Revista de Biología Tropical 50, 485505.Google Scholar
Evans, H.F., Moraal, L.G. & Pajares, J.A. (2004) Biology, ecology and economic importance of Buprestidae and Cerambycidae. pp. 447474in Lieutier, F., Day, K.R., Battisti, A., Grégoire, J.-C. & Evans, H.F. (Eds) Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Springer.Google Scholar
Fattorini, S., Manganaro, A., Piattella, E. & Salvati, L. (1999) Role of the beetles in raptor diets from a Mediterranean urban area (Coleoptera). Fragmenta Entomologica 31, 5769.Google Scholar
Fox, C.W. & Czesak, M.E. (2000) Evolutionary ecology of progeny size in arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 341369.Google Scholar
Führer, E. (1998) Oak decline in central Europe: a synopsis of hypotheses. pp. 724in McManus, M.L. & Liebhold, A.M. (Eds) Proc. Population Dynamics, Impacts, and Integrated Management of Forest Defoliating Insects. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-247. Washington, DC, USA, USDA.Google Scholar
González-Peña, C.F., Vives Noguera, E. & de Sousa Zuzarte, A.J. (2007) Nuevo Catálogo de los Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) de la Península Ibérica, Islas Baleares e Islas Atlánticas: Canarias, Açores y Madeira, Monografías SEA Vol. 12. Zaragoza, Spain, Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa.Google Scholar
Grove, S.J. (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33, 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajek, A.E., Lund, J. & Smith, M.T. (2008) Reduction in fitness of female Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) infected with Metarhizium anisopliae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 98, 198205.Google Scholar
Hanks, L.M. (1999) Influence of the larval host plant on reproductive strategies of cerambycid beetles. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 483505.Google Scholar
Hanks, L.M., McElfresh, J.S., Millar, J.G. & Paine, T.D. (1993) Phoracantha semipunctata (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a serious pest of eucalyptus in California: biology and laboratory-rearing procedures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 86, 96102.Google Scholar
Harding, P.T. & Plant, R.A. (1978) A second record of Cerambyx cerdo L. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from sub-fossil remains in Britain. Entomologist's Gazette 29, 150152.Google Scholar
Hernández, J.M. (1991) Estudio de los caracteres del huevo en diversos Cerambycidae Ibéricos y su interés taxonómico (Coleoptera). Graellsia 47, 4959.Google Scholar
Honěk, A. (1993) Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: a general relationship. Oikos 66, 483492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, K.R. (1999) Risk-spreading and bet-hedging in insect population biology. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 535560.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. & Buhroo, A.A. (2012) On the biology of Apriona germari Hope (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) infesting mulberry plants in Jammu and Kashmir, India. Nature and Science 10, 2435.Google Scholar
Iba, M. (1963) Biology of the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle, Psacothea hilaris Pascoe. (2) Oviposition habit. Sanshi-Kenkyū [Acta Sericologica] 47, 7278 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
Iba, M. (1982) Effect of adult feeding on the sexual maturation and the oviposition of the yellow-spotted longicorn beetle, Psacothea hilaris Pascoe. Journal of Sericulture Science of Japan 51, 223227 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
Iwabuchi, K. (1988) Mating behavior of Xylotrechus pyrrhoderus Bates (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). IV. Mating frequency, fecundity, fertility, and longevity. Applied Entomology and Zoology 23, 127134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jikumaru, S., Togashi, K., Taketsune, A. & Takahashi, F. (1994) Oviposition biology of Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) at a constant temperature. Applied Entomology and Zoology 29, 555561.Google Scholar
Kato, K., Yamada, H. & Shibata, E.I. (2000) Role of female adult size in reproductive fitness of Semanotus japonicus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 35, 327331.Google Scholar
Keena, M.A. (2002) Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) fecundity and longevity under laboratory conditions: comparison of populations from New York and Illinois on Acer saccharum. Environmental Entomology 31, 490498.Google Scholar
Keena, M.A. (2006) Effects of temperature on Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) adult survival, reproduction, and egg hatch. Environmental Entomology 35, 912921.Google Scholar
Koutroumpa, F.A., Vincent, B., Roux-Morabito, G., Martín, C. & Lieutier, F. (2008) Fecundity and larval development of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera Cerambycidae) in experimental breeding. Annals of Forest Science 65, 707.Google Scholar
Lawrence, W.S. (1990) Effects of body size and repeated matings on female milkweed beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) reproductive success. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83, 10961100.Google Scholar
Linsley, E.G. (1959) Ecology of Cerambycidae. Annual Review of Entomology 4, 99138.Google Scholar
López-Pantoja, G., Domínguez Nevado, L. & Sánchez-Osorio, I. (2008) Mark-recapture estimates of the survival and recapture rates of Cerambyx welensii Küster (Coleoptera cerambycidae) in a cork oak dehesa in Huelva (Spain). Central European Journal of Biology 3, 431441.Google Scholar
Martín, J., Cabezas, J., Buyolo, T. & Patón, D. (2005) The relationship between Cerambyx spp. damage and subsequent Biscogniauxia mediterranum infection on Quercus suber forests. Forest Ecology and Management 216, 166174.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K. & Irianto, R.S. (1998) Adult biology of the albizia borer, Xystrocera festiva Thomson (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), based on laboratory breeding, with particular reference to its oviposition schedule. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 10, 367378.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K., Santosa, S., Nazmulah, X. & Irianto, R.S.B. (1996) Biology of the green lined albizia longicorn, Xystrocera globosa Olivier (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), from Sumatra, based on laboratory breeding. Tropics 6, 7989.Google Scholar
Millar, J.G., Paine, T.D., Joyce, A.L. & Hanks, L.M. (2003) The effects of eucalyptus pollen on longevity and fecundity of eucalyptus longhorned borers (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 96, 370376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero, G., San Miguel, A. & Cañellas, I. (1998) Sistemas de silvicultura mediterránea, la dehesa. pp. 519554in Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. & Lamo de Espinosa, J. (Eds) Agricultura Sostenible. Madrid, Spain, Agrofuturo, Life and Mundi-Prensa.Google Scholar
Morales-Rodríguez, C., Sánchez-González, Á., Conejo-Rodríguez, Y. & Torres-Vila, L.M. (2015) First record of Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Clavicipitaceae) infecting Cerambyx welensii (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) and pathogenicity tests using a new bioassay method. Biocontrol Science and Technology 25, 12131219.Google Scholar
Murphy, D.D., Launer, A.E. & Ehrlich, P.R. (1983) The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oecologia 56, 257263.Google Scholar
Nakasuji, F. (1987) Egg size of skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) in relation to their host specificity and to leaf toughness of host plants. Ecological Research 2, 175183.Google Scholar
Nakayama, Y., Jikumaru, S. & Togashi, K. (1998) Reproductive traits and diel activity of adult Monochamus saltuarius (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) at two different temperatures. Journal of Forest Research 3, 6165.Google Scholar
Naveiro, F., Pulido, F.J., Del Pozo, J.D., Morcuende, A., González, M.A. & Muñoz, J. (1999) Situación fitosanitaria del arbolado de las dehesas en Extremadura: influencia de las labores selvícolas. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal Plagas 25, 425433.Google Scholar
Naves, P.M., De Sousa, E.M. & Quartau, J.A. (2006) Reproductive traits of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under laboratory conditions. Bulletin of Entomological Research 96, 289294.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. (1978) Hell's angels. Antenna 2, 3839.Google Scholar
Sallé, A., Nageleisen, L.M. & Lieutier, F. (2014) Bark and wood boring insects involved in oak declines in Europe: current knowledge and future prospects in a context of climate change. Forest Ecology and Management 328, 7993.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Osorio, I., López-Pantoja, G., Paramio, A.M., Lencina, J.L., Gallego, D. & Domínguez, L. (2015) Field attraction of Cerambyx welensii to fermentation odors and host monoterpenes. Journal of Pest Science. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-015-0654-2.Google Scholar
Shibata, E.I. (1987) Oviposition schedules, survivorship curves, and mortality factors within trees of two cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus Hope, and sugi bark borer, Semanotus japonicus Lacordaire. Researches on Population Ecology 29, 347367.Google Scholar
Smith, M.T., Bancroft, J. & Tropp, J. (2002) Age-specific fecundity of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on three tree species infested in the United States. Environmental Entomology 31, 7683.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. New York, USA, Freeman.Google Scholar
Stearns, S.C. (1977) The evolution of life-history traits: a critique of the theory and a review of the data. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 8, 145171.Google Scholar
Systat (2000) Systat 10.0 The System for Statistics. Richmond, CA, USA, Systat Software Inc.Google Scholar
Thomas, F.M., Blank, R. & Hartmann, G. (2002) Abiotic and biotic factors and their interactions as causes of oak decline in central Europe. Forest Pathology 32, 277307.Google Scholar
Togashi, K. (1997) Lifetime fecundity and body size of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) at a constant temperature. Japanese Journal of Entomology 65, 458470.Google Scholar
Togashi, K. (2007) Lifetime fecundity and female body size in Paraglenea fortunei (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 42, 549556.Google Scholar
Togashi, K., Akita, Y., Nakane, I., Shibata, Y. & Nakai, I. (1997) Relatively larger eggs produced by smaller females of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 32, 264266.Google Scholar
Togashi, K., Appleby, J.E., Oloumi-Sadeghi, H. & Malek, R.B. (2009) Age-specific survival rate and fecundity of adult Monochamus carolinensis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under field conditions. Applied Entomology and Zoology 44, 249256.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M. (2013) Polyandry-fecundity relationship in insects: methodological and conceptual problems. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26, 325334.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M. & Rodríguez-Molina, M.C. (2002) Egg size variation and its relationship with larval performance in the Lepidoptera: the case of the European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. Oikos 99, 272283.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Rodríguez-Molina, M.C., Roehrich, R. & Stockel, J. (1999) Vine phenological stage during larval feeding affects male and female reproductive output of Lobesia botrana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 89, 549556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Rodríguez-Molina, M.C. & Jennions, M.D. (2004) Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 55, 315324.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Sánchez-González, Á., Ponce-Escudero, F., Martín-Vertedor, D. & Ferrero-García, J.J. (2012 a) Assessing mass trapping efficiency and population density of Cerambyx welensii Küster by mark-recapture in dehesa open woodlands. European Journal of Forest Research 131, 11031116.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Cruces Caldera, E. & Rodríguez-Molina, M.C. (2012 b) Host plant selects for egg size in the moth Lobesia botrana: integrating reproductive and ecological trade-offs is not a simple matter. pp. 145167in Cauterruccio, L. (Ed.) Moths: Types, Ecological Significance and Control Methods. Hauppauge, USA, Nova Science.Google Scholar
Torres-Vila, L.M., Sánchez-González, Á., Merino-Martínez, J., Ponce-Escudero, F., Conejo-Rodríguez, Y., Martín-Vertedor, D. & Ferrero-García, J.J. (2013) Mark-recapture of Cerambyx welensii in dehesa woodlands: dispersal behaviour, population density, and mass trapping efficiency with low trap densities. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 149, 273281.Google Scholar
Vitali, F. (2001) Description des œufs des espèces françaises du genre Cerambyx. (première contribution à l’étude des œufs des longicornes) (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Cerambycinae). Les Cahiers Magellanes 4, 114.Google Scholar
Vives, E. (2000) Coleoptera Cerambycidae. Fauna Ibérica, vol. 12. Madrid, Spain, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC).Google Scholar
Walczyńska, A. (2008) Female reproductive strategy in the longhorned beetle Corymbia rubra (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Norwegian Journal of Entomology 55, 2530.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Shi, G. & Davis, L.K. (1998) Reproductive potential and daily reproductive rhythms of Oemona hirta (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 91, 13601365.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Shi, G., Song, D., Rogers, D.J., Davis, L.K. & Chen, X. (2002) Development, survival, body weight, longevity, and reproductive potential of Oemona hirta (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) under different rearing conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 95, 563569.Google Scholar
Wiklund, C. & Karlsson, B. (1984) Egg size variation in satyrid butterflies: adaptive vs historical, “Bauplan”, and mechanistic explanations. Oikos 43, 391400.Google Scholar
Yumino, M. & Togashi, K. (2015) Large variation in length of egg period in Psacothea hilaris (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 50, 4955.Google Scholar