Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:43:22.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A revision of the genus Chaetorellia Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae) including a new species associated with spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam. (Asteraceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Ian M. White  and
Kirsten Marquardt
Ian M. White
Affiliation:
CAB International Institute of Entomology, c/o British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
Kirsten Marquardt
Affiliation:
CAB International Institute of Biological Control, 1 Chemin des Grillons, Delémont, CH2800, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chaetorellia acrolophi sp. n. is associated with some European species of the subgenus Acrolophus of Centaurea. It is a potential biocontrol agent of some Acrolophus species that are adventive noxious weeds in North America. Ch. acrolophi sp. n. is described, and a key is provided to all nine species. The confirmed host-plants, knapweed, starthistles and related plants, belong to the genera Centaurea, Carthamus and Chartolepis (Asteraceae), and these are listed. Available biological data are reviewed, and some details of egg, larval and pupal morphology are described. Host-plant choice tests and canonical variates analysis were used to justify the separation of some species and to help identify some populations. The following nomenclatural changes are made (junior synonyms in brackets): Chaetorellia conjuncta (Becker) is removed from synonymy with Ch. succinea (Costa); Ch. hexachaeta australis Hering is raised to specific status; Ch. hestia Hering (=Ch. nigropicta Hering); Ch. loricata (Rondani) (= Ch. mara Hering and Ch. loricata septentrionalis Hering). Questionable synonyms include: Ch. australis Hering (?=Trypeta hexachaeta Loew); Ch. hestia (?= T. vittata Rondani); Chaetostomella cylindrica (Robineau-Desvoidy) (?= Tephritis algira Macquart, which is removed from Chaetorellia).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , September 1989 , pp. 453 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Ali, A. A., Abbas, S. A., Al-Neamy, I. K. & Abdul-Masih, A. M. E. (1979). On the biology of the yellow safflower-fly Chaetorellia carthami Stack. (Dipt., Tephritidae) in Iraq.—Z. angew. Ent. 87, 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, T. (1912). Persiche Dipteren von den Expeditionen des Herrn N. Zarudny 1898 und 1901.—Annu. Mus. zool. Acad. Sci. St.-Pétersb. 17, 503–654.Google Scholar
Blackith, R. E. & Reyment, R. A. (1971). Multivariate morphometrics—412 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, N. A. & Atchley, W. R. (1981). The geometry of canonical variate analysis.—Syst. Zool. 30, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, S. L. & Mimmocchi, T. (1988). Occurrence of selected flower head insects of Centaurea solstitialis in Italy and Greece.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 90, 47–51.Google Scholar
Costa, O. G. (1844). Descrizione di dodici specie nuove dell’-ordine de’Ditteri ed illustrazione dialtre quattuordici meno ovvie raccolte nelle state del 1834. Letta del adunanza de’24 November 1835.—Atti Accad. Napoli (1) 5 (2), 81–120.Google Scholar
Davies, R. G. (1971). Computer programming in quantitative biology.—492 pp. London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dirlbek, J. & Dirlbekova, O. (1974). Vorkommen der Bohrfliegen aus der Gattung Chaetorellia (Diptera, Trypetidae) in der CSSR.—Folia Fac. Scient. Nat. Univ. Purkynianae Brunensis, 15. Biol. 43, 83–84.Google Scholar
DostÁl, J. (1973). Preliminary notes on the subtribe Centaureinae.—Acta bot. hung. 19, 73–79.Google Scholar
DostÁl, J. (1975). New nomenclatural combinations and taxa of the Compositae subtribe Centaureinae in Europe.—pp. 191–210in Heywood, V. H. (Ed.). Flora Europaea. Notulae systematicae as florum Europaeam spectantes. No. 18.—Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 71, 191–210.Google Scholar
DostÁl, J. (1976). 138. Centaurea L.—pp. 254–301in Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb, D. A. (Eds). Flora Europaea. Vol. 4.—505 pp. Cambridge, Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Efflatoun, H. C. (1924). A monograph of Egyptian Diptera, part II, Fam. Trypaneidae.—Mém. Soc. ent. Égypte 7 (2) (1923), 152–156.Google Scholar
Efflatoun, H. C. (1927). On the morphology of some Egyptian trypaneid larvae (Diptera), with describtions of some hitherto unknown forms.—Bull. Soc. ent. Égypte (N. S.) 11, 18–50.Google Scholar
Feinbrun-Dothan, N. (1978). Flora Palaestina. Vol. 3 (text, Ericaceae to Compositae).—481 pp. Jerusalem, Israel Acad. Sci. Humanities.Google Scholar
Foote, R. H. (1967). Family Tephritidae (Trypetidae, Trypaneidae).—pp. 51–52in Steyskal, G. C. & Saad el Bialy, (Eds). A list of Egyptian Diptera with a bibliography and key to families.—Tech. Bull. Min. Agr. (U. A. R.) 3, 1–87.Google Scholar
Foote, R. H. (1984). Family Tephritidae (Trypetidae).—pp. 66–149 in Soós, A. & Papp, L. (Eds). Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 9—460 pp. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Foote, R. H. & Steyskal, G. C. (1987). 66. Tephritidae.—pp. 817–831in McAlpine, J. F. (Ed.). Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 2.—pp. 675–1332. Ottawa, Agric. Can. (Monogr. Res. Branch, Agric. Can. no. 28).Google Scholar
Freidberg, A.. (1974) Tephritidae (Diptera) from Mt. Hermon.—Israel J. Entomol. 9, 133–139.Google Scholar
Freidberg, A. (1985). The genus Craspedoxantha Bezzi (Diptera: Tephritidae: Terelliinae).—Ann. Natal Mus. 27, 183–206.Google Scholar
Fuchs-Echert, H. P. (1980). Beiträge zur Nomenklatur und Taxonomie der Schweizer Flora.—Feddes Repertorium 90, 525–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. (1985). Biocontrol of weeds: bureaucrats, botanists, beekeepers and other bottlenecks.—pp. 3–12in Delfosse, E. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds, Vancouver, 1984.—885 pp. Ottawa, Agric. Can.Google Scholar
Harris, P. (1988). Environmental impact of weed-control insects; weed stands have been replaced by diverse plant communities.—Bioscience 38, 542–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. & Myers, J. H. (1984). 31. Centaurea diffusa Lam. and C. maculosa Lam. s. lat., diffuse and spotted knapweed (Compositae).—pp. 127–137in Kelleher, J. S. & Hulme, M. A. (Eds). Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada 1969–1980.—410 pp. Slough, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
Hendel, F. (1927). 49. Trypetidae.—Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. 5 (1), 1–221.Google Scholar
Hering, M. (1937a). Bohrfliegen von Tighina (Rumänien).—Bull. Sect. scient. Acad. roum. 18, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hering, M. (1937b). Neue Bohrfliegen aus der Beckerschen Sammlung (Dipt.).—Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl. 22, 244–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hering, E. M. [formerly M Hering] (1940). Neue Arten und Gattungen.—Siruna Seva 2, 1–16.Google Scholar
Ivannikov, A. I. (1977). Diptera (Tephritidae) phytophages of Centaurea weeds on the pastures of Kazakhstan (biological control) [in Russian].—Izv. Akad. Nauk kazakh. SSR, Ser. Biol. 5, 30–33.Google Scholar
Kabos, W. J. (1959). Tweevleugelige Insekten-Diptera V de Nederlandse Boorvliegen (Trypetidae) en Prachtvliegen (Otitidae).—Wet. Meded. K. ned. natuurh. Veren. 33, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1891). Die Zoocecidien Lothringens (Fortsetzung).—Ent. Nachr. 17, 220–224, 230–240, 252–256.Google Scholar
Klokov, M. V., Sosnovskiy, D. I., Tsvelev, N. N. & Cherepanov, S. K. (1963). 1624. Centaurea— pp. 370–579in Bobrov, E. G. & Cherepanov, S. K. (Eds). Flora URSS (Flora Unionis Rerumpublication Socialisticarum Sovieticarum) [in Russian]. Vol. 28.—653 pp. Moscow, Soviet Acad. Sci.Google Scholar
Korneyev, V. (1983). Chaetorellia loricata (Rondani, 1870) = Ch. holosericea Hendel, 1927, syn. n. [in Russian]—Vestn. Zool. 1983 (6), 45.Google Scholar
Korneyev, V. (1985). Fruit flies of the tribe Terelliini (Diptera, Tephritidae) in the USSR [in Russian].—Ent. Obozr. 64, 626–644. [English translation in Ent. Rev., Wash. 65, 35–55].Google Scholar
Kugler, J. & Freidberg, A. (1975). A list of the fruitflies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Israel and nearby areas, their host plants and distribution.—Israel J. Entomol. 10, 51–72.Google Scholar
Leclercq, M.. (1967). Contribution à l'étude des Trypetidae (Diptera) paléarctiques et de leurs relations avec les végétaux.—Bull. Rech. agron. Gembloux 2, 64–105.Google Scholar
Lowe, H. (1844). Kritische Untersuchung der europäischen Arten der Gattung Trypeta.—Germar's Z. Ent. 5, 312–437.Google Scholar
Loew, H. (1862). Die europäischen Bohrfliegen (Trypetidae).—128 pp. Wien, Staats-Druckerei.Google Scholar
Macquart, J. (1843). Diptéres exotiques nouveaux ou peu connus.—Mém. Soc. Sci. Agric. Lille 1842, 162–460.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M. (1981). Introduction, phenology, and density of yellow starthistle in coastal, intercoastal, and central valley situations in California.—Agric. Res. Serv. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. ARR-W-2007, 1–33.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M. & Mayfield, A. (1985). Yellow starthistle infestations are on the increase.—Calif. Agric. 39, (11/12), 10–12.Google Scholar
Maddox, D. M., Mayfield, A. & Poritz, N. H. (1985). Distribution of Yellow starthistle Centaurea solstitialis and Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens).—Weed Sci. 33, 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaritis, L. H. (1985). Comparative study of the eggshell of the fruit flies Dacus oleae and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Trypetidae).—Can. J. Zool. 63, 2194–2206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. (1969). Principles of systematic zoology.—428 pp. Bombay, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J. F. (1981). 2. Morphology and terminology.—pp. 9–63 in McAlpine, J. F., Peterson, B. V., Schewell, G. E., Teskey, H. J., Vockeroth, J. R. & Wood, D. M. (Eds). Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Vol. 1.—pp. 1–674. Ottawa, Agric. Can. (Monogr. Res. Branch, Agric. Can. no. 27).Google Scholar
Mihályi, F. (1960). Fúrólegyek. Trypetidae.—Fauna Hung. 56, 1–76.Google Scholar
Moore, R. J. (1972). Distribution of native and introduced knapweeds (Centaurea) in Canada and the United States.—Rhodora 74, 331–346.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P. & Freidberg, A. (1983). The fruit flies of Crete (Diptera: Tephritidae).—Israel J. Entomol. 17, 81–94.Google Scholar
Norrbom, A. L. & Kim, K. C. (1988). Revision of the schausi group Anastrepha Schiner (Diptera: Tephritidae), with a discussion of the terminology of the female terminalia in the Tephritoidea.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 81, 164–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petney, T. N. & Zwölfer, H. (1985). Phytophagous insects associated withCynareae hosts (Asteraceae) in Jordan.—Israel J. Entomol. 19, 147–159.Google Scholar
Phillips, V. T. (1946). The biology and identification of trypetid larvae.—Mem. Am. ent. Soc. 12, 1–161.Google Scholar
Piper, G. L. (1985). Biological control of weeds in Washington: status report.—pp. 817–826. in Delfosse, E. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds, Vancouver, 1984.—885 pp. Ottawa, Agric. Can.Google Scholar
Rikhter, V. A. (1965). A review of the fruit flies (Diptera, Trypetidae) of Kazakhstan [in Russian].—Ent. Obozr. 44, 141–150 [English translation in Ent. Rev., Wash. 44, 79–84].Google Scholar
Rikhter, V. A. (1970). 62. Tephritidae (Trypetidae).—pp. 132–172in Bei-Bienko, G. Ya. (Ed.). Keys to the insects of the European part of the USSR [in Russian].—Opred. Faune SSSR 103, (V), 941 pp.Google Scholar
Robineau-Desvoidy, J. B. (1830). Essai sur les Myodaires.—Mém. prés. div. Sav. Acad. Sci. Inst. Fr. (2) 2, 1–813.Google Scholar
Roché, B. F., Piper, G. L. & Talbott, C. J. (1986). Knapweeds of Washington.—41 pp. Pullman, Wash. St. Cooperative Ext.Google Scholar
Rondani, C. (1870). Ortalidinae Italicae collectae, distinctate et in ordinem dispositae [part].—Bull. Soc. ent. ital. 2, 5–31, 105–133.Google Scholar
Scharank, F., von, P. (1781). Enumeratio Insectorum Austriae indigendorum.—548 pp. Vindobona.Google Scholar
Séguy, E. (1934). Diptéres (Brachycéres) (Muscidae Acalypterae et Scatophagidae).—Faune de France, Paris 28, 1–832.Google Scholar
Selim, A. A. (1977). Insect pests of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) in Mosul, Northern Iraq.—Mesopotamia J. Agric. 12, 75–78.Google Scholar
Sobhian, R. & Zwölfer, H. (1985). Phytophagous insect species associated with flower heads of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis L.).—Z. angew. Ent. 99, 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stackelberg, A. A. (1929). Über eine neue Art der Gattung Chaetorellia Hend. (Diptera Trypetidae), nebst einigen Bemerkungen über andere Arten der Gattung.—Zashch. Rast. Vredit. 4, 225–229.Google Scholar
Story, J. M. (1985). Status of biological weed control in Montana.—pp. 837–842in Delfosse, E. S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds, Vancouver, 1984.—885 pp. Ottawa, Agric. Can.Google Scholar
Tzanakakis, M. E. & Economopoulos, A. (1967). Two efficient larval diets for continuous rearing of the olive fruit fly.—J. econ. Ent. 60, 660–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G. C. (1937). The life-history of some trypetid flies with descriptions of the early stages (Diptera).—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 12, 109–122.Google Scholar
von Frauenfeld, G. R. (1863). Beitrag zur Metamorphosengeschichte aus dem Jahre 1862. I. Die Trypeten.—Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 13, 214–224.Google Scholar
Wagenitz, G. (1975). 79. Centaurea.—pp. 465–585in Davis, P. H. (Ed.). Flora of Turkey and the east Aegean Islands. Vol. 5.—890 pp. Edinburgh, Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Wagenitz, G. (1980). 39. Centaurea.—pp. 313–420in Rechinger, K. H. (Ed.). Flora Iranica (Flora des Iranischen Hochlandes und der Umrahmenden Gebirge). 139 (b).—pp. 287–468. Graz, Akademische Druck.Google Scholar
Wainwright, S. J. & Gilbert, R. I. (1987). A BASIC computer program which tests for normality and the presence of outliers in data.—Lab. Pract. 36, 467.Google Scholar
White, I. M. (1988). Tephritid flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).—Handbk Ident. Br. Insects 10, (5a), 1–134.Google Scholar
White, I. M. (1989a). A new species of Terellia Robineau-Desvoidy associated with Centaurea solstitialis and a revision of the Terellia virens (Loew) species group (Diptera: Tephritidae).—Entomologist's mon. Mag. 125, 53–61.Google Scholar
White, I. M. (1989b). Taxonomic problems in the genus Chaetorellia.— in Cavalloro, R. (Ed.). Proceedings of the CEC/IOBC International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, 1987.—Rotterdam, Balkema.Google Scholar
White, I. M. & Clement, S. L. (1987). Systematic notes on Urophora (Diptera, Tephritidae) species associated with Centaurea solstitialis (Asteraceae, Cardueae) and other Palaearctic weeds adventive in North America.—Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 89, 571–580.Google Scholar
White, I. M. & Korneyev, V. A. (1989). A revision of the western Palaearctic species of Urophora (Robineau-Desvoidy).—Syst. Entomol. 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwölfer, H. (1965). Preliminary list of phytophagous insects attacking wild Cynareae (Compositae) species in Europe.—Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. biol. Control. 6, 81–154.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1970). Project 19. Natural enemies of star thistle (Centaurea solstitialis) (for California).—pp. 36–37. in Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control, Report of work carried out during 1969.—103 pp. Slough, Commonw. Agric. Bur.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1974a). Das Treffpunkt-Prinzip als Kommunikationsstrategie und Isolationsmechanismus bei Bohrfliegen (Diptera: Trypetidae).—Entomol. ger. 1, 11–20.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1974b). Innerartliche Koummunikationssysteme bei Bohrfliegen.—Biol. unserer Zeit 5, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwölfer, H. (1983). Life systems and strategies of resource exploitation tephritids.—pp. 16–20in Cavalloro, R. (Ed.). Proceedings of the CEC/IOBC International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance, 1982.—642 pp. Rotterdam, Balkema.Google Scholar