Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:36:56.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies of Crop Loss following Insect Attack on Cotton in East Africa

I.—Experiments in Uganda and Tanganyika

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

K. S. McKinlay
Affiliation:
Colonial Pesticide Research Unit, East Africa
Q. A. Geering
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge.

Extract

The loss of crop following insect attack on cotton was studied in 1950–54 at the Cotton Research Station, Namulonge, which is situated in the elephant-grass zone of Uganda, in which the principal pest of cotton was originally considered to be Lygus vosseleri Popp. In 1953, the main invasion of cotton by Lygus occurred during September and October, originating from cultivated crops of black gram (Phaseolus mungo) and sorghum and from the wild perennial legume, Pseudarthria sp., which earlier workers had considered important. Trials in this zone have demonstrated, over a number of years, that early June is the optimum date for sowing cotton, although such sowings receive the heaviest attack by L. vosseleri. Experiments to determine the maximum loss of yield due to Lygus should therefore be made with cotton sown at this time. Bollworms are also important pests, notably Heliothis armigera (Hb.) and Earias spp., their attacks following those of Lygus and being heaviest in October–November.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bebbington, A. G. & McKinstry, A. H. (1945). Tanganyika. Eastern Province. Progress report for 1943.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., 1943–44, pp. 124135.Google Scholar
Coaker, T. H. (1957). Studies of crop loss following insect attack on cotton in East Africa. II.—Further experiments in Uganda.—Bull. ent. Res., 48, pp. 851866.Google Scholar
Darling, H. S. (1947). Report of the Entomologist.—Rep. Dep. Agric. Uganda, 1945–46, 2, pp. 1630.Google Scholar
Dunnam, E. W., Clark, J. C. & Calhoun, S. L. (1943). Effect of the removal of squares on yield of upland cotton.—J. econ. Ent., 36, pp. 896900.Google Scholar
Eaton, F. M. (1931). Early defloration as a method of increasing cotton yields, and the relation of fruitfulness to fiber and boll characters.—J. agric. Res., 42, pp. 447462.Google Scholar
Farbrother, H. G. (1953). Plant physiology.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., Namulonge, 1952–53, pp. 1522.Google Scholar
Farbrother, H. G. (1954). Plant physiology.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., Namulonge, 1953–54, pp. 1521.Google Scholar
Gaines, J. C. & Wipprecht, R. (1950). Evaluation of dusting and spraying schedules for cotton insect control.—J. econ. Ent., 43, pp. 286288.Google Scholar
Geering, Q. A. (1954). The influence of Lygus vosseleri on crop loss of cotton in Uganda.—Rep. 6th Commonw. ent. Conf. 1954, pp. 8386.Google Scholar
Geering, Q. A. & McKinlay, K. S. (1953). Entomology.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., Namulonge, 1952–53, pp. 2527.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. L. & Gaines, J. C. (1952). Evaluation of dusting schedules for control of cotton insects.—J. econ. Ent., 45, pp. 549550.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. L. & Mistric, W. J. jr, (1953). Effect of different treatment schedules for control of cotton insects.—J. econ. Ent., 46, pp. 641644.Google Scholar
McKinlay, K. S. (1953). Use of repellents to simplify insecticide field trials.—Nature, Lond., 171, p. 658.Google Scholar
McKinlay, K. S. (1954). The design of insecticide field trials on cotton in Uganda.—Proc. 6th Symp. Colston Res. Soc., 1953, pp. 5359. London, Butterworth.Google Scholar
Manning, H. L. (1949). Planting date and cotton production in the Buganda Province of Uganda.—Emp. J. exp. Agric., 17, pp. 245258.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. O. (1952). Cotton Research Station, Namulonge. Progress report for the season 1950–51.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., 1950–51, pp. 1012.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. O., Geering, Q. A. & McKinlay, K. S. (1952). Entomology.—Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., Namulonge, 1951–52, pp. 1522.Google Scholar
Pearson, E. O. & Mitchell, B. L. (1945). A report on the status and control of insect pests of cotton in the Lower River districts of Nyasaland.—48 pp. Zomba, Govt. Printer.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. C. (1945). Lygus simonyi, Reut., as a cotton pest in Uganda.—Bull. ent. Res., 36, pp. 121148.Google Scholar