Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:16:25.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Choice of Food-plant and certain Aspects of the Digestive Physiology of the Larvae and Adults of Athalia lugens proxima (Klug) and Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (F.)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. D. Srivastava
P. D. Srivastava
Affiliation:
Zoological Research Laboratories, University of Allahabad.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Athalia lugens subsp. proximo (Klug) is a pest of cruciferous crops, and shows special preference for turnip. In the matter of selection of food, smell and taste of the food and the age of the plant are important factors. Epilachna vigintioctopunctata (F.) is a pest of solanaceous plants, particularly brinjal. In this insect only smell and taste are important factors in the selection of food.

The hydrogen-ion concentrations of the salivary gland, foregut, midgut and hindgut of the larva of Athalia are 6·4–6·6, 6·4–6·8, 6·6–6·8 and 7·0 and of the adults 6·2–6·4, 6·4–6·6, 6·4–6·6 and 6·6, respectively. The hydrogen-ion concentration of the salivary gland, foregut, midgut and hindgut of the larvae of Epilachna are 5·4, 6·4–6·8, 6·0 and 6·0 and of the adult 6·6–6·8, 6·2, 6·0 and 5·4–5·7, respectively.

The foregut and hindgut of the larvae and adults of Athalia and Epilachna do not secrete enzymes; the salivary glands of both larva and adult of Athalia secrete amylase, the midgut epithelium of both larva and adult of Athalia secretes amylase, maltase, invertase, lactase, lipase and protease. The salivary glands of the larva of Epilachna secrete amylase, but those of the adult do not, and the midgut epithelium of both larva and adult secretes amylase, maltase, invertase, lactase and protease. The midgut of both larva and adult of Epilachna secretes lipase also, although in the adult no more than traces are detectable. The proteases in both insects act in slightly acidic media.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1957 , pp. 289 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, G. H. (1923). Body fluid of the honey bee larva.—J. biol. Chem, 58, pp. 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodine, J. H. (1925). Physiology of the Orthoptera. Hydrogen ion concentration of blood and alimentary tract of certain Orthoptera.—Biol. Bull., Wood's Hole, 48, pp. 79–82.Google Scholar
*Bramstedt, F. (1948). Ueber die Verdauungsphysiologie der Aphiden.—Z. Naturf, 3b, pp. 14–24.Google Scholar
Brown, A. W. A. (1937). A note on the utilisation of polysaccharides by a grasshopper.—Bull. ent. Res, 28, pp. 333–336.Google Scholar
Crowell, H. H. (1943). Feeding habits of the Southern Armyworm and rate of passage of food through its gut.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer, 36, pp. 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Crozier, W. J. (1924). Hydrogen ion concentration within the alimentary tract of insects.—J. gen. Physiol, 6, pp. 289–293.Google Scholar
Hinman, E. H. (1933). Enzymes in the digestive tract of mosquito larvae.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer, 26, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1931). Studies on the nutrition of blow-fly larvae. I. Structure and function of the alimentary tract.—J. exp. Biol, 8, pp. 109–123.Google Scholar
Jameson, A. P. & Atkins, W. R. G. (1921). On the physiology of the silkworm.—Biochem. J, 15, pp. 209–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
*MacGregor, M. E. (1931). The nutrition of adult mosquitoes: preliminary contribution.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg, 24, pp. 465–472.Google Scholar
*Shinoda, O. (1930 a). Contributions to the knowledge of intestinal secretion in insects. III. On the digestive enzymes of the silkworm.—J. Biochem, 11, pp. 345–367.Google Scholar
*Shinoda, O. (1930 b). Contributions to the knowledge of intestinal secretion in insects. IV. A comparison of the pH optima of the digestive enzymes from different groups of insects. A preliminary note.—Anniversary Volume to Prof. Masumi Chikashige, Kyoto, pp. 8–23.Google Scholar
Swingle, H. S. (1928). Digestive enzymes of the Oriental Fruit Moth.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer, 21, pp. 469–475.Google Scholar
Swingle, M. C. (1931). The influence of soil acidity on the pH value of the contents of the digestive tract of Japanese Beetle larvae.—Ann. ent. Soc. Amer, 24, pp. 496–502.Google Scholar
Trager, W. (1947). Insect nutrition.—Biol. Rev, 22, pp. 148–177.Google Scholar
*Ullmann, T. (1932). Über die Einwirkung der Fermente einiger Wirbellosen auf polymere Kohlenhydrate.—Z. vergl. Physiol, 17, pp. 520–536.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1940). Studies of the physiology and toxicology of blowflies. 5. The hydrogen ion concentration in the alimentary canal.—Pamphl. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust, no. 102, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, D. F. (1949). The hydrogen ion concentration in the alimentary canal of larval and adult Lepidoptera.—Aust. J. sci. Res, (B) 2, pp. 428–437.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1950). The principles of insect physiology.—4th edn., 544 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar