Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:03:22.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the effect of the nutrient status of sugar-cane on the fecundity of Saccharosydne saccharivora (Westw.) (Hom., Delphacidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. R. Metcalfe
J. R. Metcalfe
Affiliation:
Sugar Manufacturers' Association (of Jamaica) Ltd., Mandeville, Jamaica
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An account is given of glasshouse experiments in Jamaica to determine the effects of agronomic practice on the fecundity of the sugar-cane pest Saccharosydne saccharivora (Westw.). Eggs (up to one egg per ovariole per day) develop throughout adult life. On young vigorous plant cane the pre-oviposition period was 5·3 days; egg production was highest during the first six days of the oviposition period and declined markedly after 12 days. Mean daily egg production per female over 12 days was taken as an index of fecundity.

The effects of fertiliser application (ammonium sulphate and potassium chloride), wet and dry water regimes, variety (B41227, B42231 and B4362) and crop cycle (plant and ratoon cane), all at different stages of crop development, were observed in four series of experiments involving 1 000 female S. saccharivora. Potassium (K2O) and phosphorus (P2O5) per cent lamina dry matter varied comparatively little, but nitrogen content declined with the age of the plant, increased with application of ammonium sulphate, and was unaffected by crop cycle or variety. Egg production was highest on young cane (up to a mean of 12·0 eggs per female per day), but declined on older cane; it increased with the application of ammonium sulphate but was unaffected by potassium chloride. A direct linear correlation between egg production and the nitrogen content of the leaf (r2 = 0·69, 0·81, 0·52 and 0·69 in series I–IV, respectively) suggested a causal relationship. The pre-oviposition period lengthened and the proportion of females failing to lay any eggs increased in the absence of fertiliser and with increasing plant age. Variation in leaf nitrogen under field conditions could affect egg production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 60 , Issue 2 , December 1970 , pp. 309 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1963). Rep. Res. Dep. Sug. Mfrs' Ass. Jamaica Ltd. 1963, p. 23.Google Scholar
Ashby, D. G. (1954). The canefly with particular reference to its occurrence on Caymanas Estate.—26 + 3 pp. multigraph. Mandeville, Jamaica, Pest Control Ltd. (Unpublished)Google Scholar
Auclair, J. L. (1963). Aphid feeding and nutrition.—A. Rev. Ent. 8, 439–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, F. D. (1959). Report on a visit to Jamaica to investigate an outbreak of canefly. 02 1959.—28 pp. typescript. St. Augustine, Trinidad Commonw.Inst. biol. Control. (Unpublished)Google Scholar
Burr, G. O., Harrt, C. E., Brodie, H. W., Tanimoto, T., Kortschak, H. P., Takahashi, D., Ashton, F. M. & Coleman, R. E. (1957). The sugarcane plant.—A. Rev. PL Physiol. 8, 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennah, R. G. (1969). Damage to sugar cane by Fulgoroidea and related insects in relation to the metabolic state of the host-plant. In Williams, J. R. et al. (Ed.) Pests of sugar cane, pp. 367–389. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hinckley, A. D. (1963). Ecology and control of rice planthoppers in Fiji.—Bull. ent. Res. 54, 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindner, R. C. (1944). Rapid analytical methods for some of the more common inorganic constituents of plant tissues.—Pl Physiol. 19, 76–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J. R. (1965). Nitrogen status of sugar-cane leaves and the fecundity of a Hemipterous pest.—Nature. Lond. 207, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, J. R. (1969). Studies on the biology of the sugar-cane pest Saccharosydne saccharivora (Westw.) (Horn., Delphacidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 59, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. W. (1912). The cane fly. (Delphax saccharivora).—Bull. Dep. Agric. Jamaica 2, 78–80.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S. (1950). Soil and plant analysis.—pp. 200, 284–291. New York, Interscience.Google Scholar
Van Dine, D. L. (1912). Bull. Porto Rico Sug. Prod. Exp. Stn 2, 15–22.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1965). The principles of insect physiology.—6th edn, 741 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar