Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:40:53.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Studies on Wheat Bulb Fly (Leptohylemyia coarctata (Fall.)). IV.—The Distribution of Damage in England and Wales in 1953

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

H. C. Gough
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Advisory Service, Anstey Hall, Trumpington, Cambridge.

Summary

It is estimated that in 1953, as a result of attack by Wheat Bulb Fly, Leptohylemyia coarctata (Fall.), 59,000 acres of wheat were re-drilled and 58,000 acres were patched with spring-sown wheat; another 85,000 acres were affected without any action being taken by the farmer. The cost of new seed and the reduction of yield of spring wheat as compared with winter wheat represent a minimum financial loss of about £1,200,000. With the aid of maps it is shown that the distribution of damage is similar to the distribution of wheat and to the area with less than 30 in., rainfall annually. In districts where over 5 per cent. of the combined crops and grass acreage is in potatoes, there is a tendency for the amount of damage by Wheat Bulb Fly to increase with increasing potato acreage.

It is tentatively suggested on circumstantial evidence that high rainfall on the west side of the country is partly responsible for the absence there of damage by Wheat Bulb Fly. Many of the variations in the distribution of damage on the eastern side of the country could be accounted for by differences in cropping.

In Scotland, the distribution of the fly is also confined to the eastern side. There are a few records of the fly in the Republic of Ireland.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, J. & Blunck, H. (1927). Die Getreideblumenfliege in ihren Beziehungen zu Nässe, Bodenart und Vorfrucht.—Landw. Wbl. Schles.-Holst, 77, pp. 11291133.Google Scholar
Bremer, H. (1931). Beitrag zur Epidemiologie der Brachfliegenschäden (Hylemyia coarctata Fall.).—Z. angew. Ent, 18, pp. 354360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crüger, O. & Körting, A. (1931). Ueber die Eiablage der Getreideblumenfliege und die unmittelbare Voraussage ihres Schad-Auftretens.—Z. PflKrankh, 41, pp. 4961.Google Scholar
Gough, H. C. (1946). Studies on Wheat Bulb Fly (Leptohylemyia coarctata, Fall.). I. Biology.—Bull. ent. Res, 37, pp. 251271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, H. C. (1947). Studies on Wheat Bulb Fly, Leptohylemyia coarctata, Fall. II. Numbers in relation to crop damage.—Bull. ent. Res, 37, pp. 439454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, H. C. (1949). Studies on Wheat Bulb Fly, Leptohylemyia coarctata, Fall. III. A survey of infestation in Yorkshire.—Bull. ent. Res, 40, pp. 267277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, H. C. (1953). The problem of the Wheat Bulb Fly.—Agriculture, Lond, 60, pp. 315320.Google Scholar
Kleine, R. (1918). Die Getreideblumenfliege, Hylemyia coarctata, Fall. Diesjährige Beobachtungen in Pommern.—Z. angew. Ent, 4, pp. 1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, H. W. & Miles, M. [1955]. Three important pests of cereals in Britain.—J. R. agric. Soc, 115, pp. 4759.Google Scholar
Morison, G. D. (1955). Insect and other pests for the year 1953.—Trans. R. Highl. agric. Soc. Scot, 66, pp. 4055.Google Scholar
Rostrup, S. (1924). Kornets blomsterflue (Hylemyia coarctata) i Danmark 1903–1923.—Tidsskr. Planteavl, 30, pp. 713759.Google Scholar
Schnauer, W. (1929). Untersuchungen über Schadgebiet und Umweltfaktoren einiger landwirtschaftlicher Schädlinge in Deutschland auf Grund statistischer Unterlagen.—Z. angew. Ent, 15, pp. 565627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott Watson, J. A. (1946). How the N.A.A.S. will work.—Agriculture, Lond, 53, pp. 375380.Google Scholar
Stokes, B. M. (1955). Host plants of Wheat Bulb Fly.—Plant Path, 4, pp. 102105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, I. (1948). Insect damage assessment.—Agriculture, Lond, 55, pp. 125129.Google Scholar