Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:26:10.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study of spontaneous Locomotor Activity in Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.) by the Actograph Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Extract

An actograph apparatus is described for recording in 24-hour periods, under controlled conditions, the activity of Locusta migratoria migratorioides (R. & F.) in terms of distance travelled.

Great variation was observed in the amount of activity shown by different individuals and the activity of any one individual is shown to vary considerably over each stadium, the highest level occurring about half-way between moults, and falling off towards the beginning and end of each stadium.

An insect is shown to be capable of very intense activity immediately before a moult if no convenient moulting place is found.

No significant difference is found between the activity of males and females, but the average distance travelled in a 24-hour period in the 4th and 5th stadia is shown to be greater than that in the 2nd or 3rd.

The daily activity of adults is shown to vary considerably from day to day, and the diurnal distribution of the activity of adults up to seven days old is shown to be similar to that of nymphs.

The unequal distribution of activity over each 24-hour period is shown to be due to absence of fresh food in the second half of each record, and the effect of this starvation is shown to vary according to the stage of development of the insect.

The effects of changes in relative humidity on the amount and distribution of activity are shown to be very slight or none.

A diurnal periodicity is shown to be induced in the insects when reared under alternating 12-hour periods of light and dark. The longer the conditioning lasts, the more clear-cut is the periodicity. In constant darkness the periodicity is retained for only a few days and gradually disappears.

A tendency for periods of high activity to recur every 2–2½ hours is demonstrated in certain records. In the other records, constituting actually the majority, it is suggested that the periodicity is masked or that the locust's nervous mechanism is inadequate to maintain it.

Preliminary experiments with a form of trophograph suggest that the 2–2½ hour periodicity may be associated with a hunger rhythm.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodenheimer, F. S. (1929). Studien zur Epidemiologie, Oekologie und Physiologie der afrikanischen Wanderheuschrecke (Schistocerca gregaria Forsk.).—Z. angew. Ent. 15, pp. 435577, 55 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S. (1931). Uber thermotaktisches Verhalten, Körpertemperatur und Aktivitätsminintum bei Insekten.—Zool. Anz. 93, pp. 5961.Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S. & Klein, H. Z. (1930). Uber die Temperaturabhängigkeiten von Insekten. 2. Die Abhängigkeit der Aktivität der Ernteameise Messor semirufus E. André, von Temperatur und anderen Faktoren.—Z. vergl. Physiol. 11, pp. 345385, 17 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S. & Schenkin, D. (1928). Uber die Temperaturabhängigkeiten von Insekten. 1. Uber die Vorzugstemperatur einiger Insekten.—Z. vergl. Physiol. 8, pp. 115, 10 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, J. C. (1923). The life history of the Brown Locust, Locusta pardalina (Walker). J. Dep. Agric. S. Afr. 7, pp. 205224, 2 pls.Google Scholar
Faure, J. C. (1932). The phases of locusts in South Africa.—Bull. Ent. Res. 23, pp. 293405, 202 figs., 38 pls., 27 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1934). Statistical methods for Research Workers (5th Edn.). London.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A. G. (1936). The relation of temperature and humidity to the development of three species of African Locusts.—Trans. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 85, pp. 160, 26 figs., 2 pls., 31 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeble, F. (1910). Plant-Animals. Cambridge (p. 173, pl. 1.)Google Scholar
Key, K. H. L. (1936 a). Observations on the rate of growth, coloration and the abnormal six-instar life-cycle in Locusta migratoria migratorioides.—Bull. Ent. Res. 27, pp. 7785, 4 figs., 5 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, K. H. L. (1936 b). Rate of locomotion in relation to starvation in Locusta migratoria migratorioides.—Proc. R. Ent. Soc. Lond. 11, pp. 36, 2 figs., 2 tables.Google Scholar
Key, K. H. L. (1936 c). Experimental studies on locomotor activity in Locusta migratoria migratorioides.—Bull. Ent. Res. 27, pp. 399422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, F. E. (1932). Experiments with Orthoptera concerning diurnal rhythms.—Amer. Mus. Nov., No. 550, pp. 124, 14 figs., 3 tables.Google Scholar
Meunier, K. (1929). Experimentelles über den Schwärmtrieb und das periodische Auftreten verschiedener Activitätsformen beim Maikäfer (Melolontha melolontha L.).—Z. angew. Ent. 14, pp. 91139, 19 figs., 5 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. F. (1929). Determining the effect of changes in temperature upon the locomotor movements of fly larvae.—J. Exp. Zool. 52, pp. 293313, 11 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, O. & Keller, J. G. (1932). Studies in nocturnal ecology : 2. Preliminary analysis of activity rhythm in nocturnal forest insects.—Ecology 13, pp. 335346, 7 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnikov, V. I. (1924). Some observations on the variability of Locusta migratoria L. in breeding experiments.—Bull. Ent. Res. 14, pp. 241243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein-Beling, I. von. (1935). Uber das Zeitgedächtnis bei Tieren.—Biol. Rev. 10, pp. 1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, J. S. (1914). Eine Methode zur Untersuchung der Ruhe und Aktivitätsperioden bei Tieren.—Pflug. Arch. ges. Physiol. 158, pp. 343385, 35 figs., 9 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, J. S. (1918). Versuche über Aktivität und Ruhe bei Säuglingen.—Pflug. Arch. ges. Physiol. 172, pp. 424429, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymanski, J. S. (1920). Aktivität und Ruhe bei Tieren und Menschen.—Z. allg. Physiol 18, pp. 105162, 16 figs.Google Scholar
Uvarov, B. P. (1928). Locusts and Grasshoppers. London.Google Scholar
Wolff, E. (1930). Die Aktivität der japanischen Tanzmaus und ihre rhythmische Verteilung.—Z. vergl. Physiol. 11, pp. 321344, 13 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar