Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:57:45.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survival and behaviour of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) released in the field: a comparison between wild flies and animal-fed and in vitro-fed laboratory-reared flies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. A. Vale ,
J. W. Hargrove ,
A. M. Jordan ,
P. A. Langley  and
A. R. Mews
G. A. Vale
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P.O. Box 8283, Causeway, Rhodesia
J. W. Hargrove
Affiliation:
Tsetse and Trypanosomiasis Control Branch, Department of Veterinary Services, P.O. Box 8283, Causeway, Rhodesia
A. M. Jordan
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU, England
P. A. Langley
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU, England
A. R. Mews
Affiliation:
Tsetse Research Laboratory, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Male and female Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. which emerged from puparia produced by animal-fed and in vitro-fed colonies in England were marked distinctively with non-toxic paint and released into a natural habitat of G. morsitans and G. pallidipes Aust. in Rhodesia. Concurrently, adults of both species which emerged from locally-collected puparia were marked and released. Recaptures from artificial refuges, odour attractants and mobile baits at periods up to 59 days after release and at distances up to 1800 m from the release site indicated no clear differences between native G. morsitans and the two laboratory-reared groups in respect of body size, amount of fat present at emergence, survival, dispersal, availability to a range of baits, diet, speed of taking a first meal, wing damage and insemination rate. Although the blood-meal identifications for marked female G. morsitans were similar to those for both sexes of unmarked flies, blood-meals from marked males showed a relatively high proportion of bovid identifications. Unmarked flies caught were generally older than marked catches. The ratio of females to males in unmarked samples (1:1 for G. morsitans, 2:1 for G. pallidipes) was roughly double that in marked catches.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , December 1976 , pp. 731 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, J. (1972). The visual responsiveness of the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans Westw. (Glossinidae) to moving objects: the effects of hunger, sex, host odour, and stimulus characteristics.—Bull. ent. Res. 62, 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E. (1958). The water balance of tsetse pupae.—Phil. Trans. R. Soc. (B) 241, 179–210.Google Scholar
Bursell, E. (1959). The water balance of tsetse flies.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 111, 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursell, E. (1961). Post-teneral development of the thoracic musculature in tsetse flies.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 36, 69–74.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. (1955). The natural history of tsetse flies. An account of the biology of the genus Glossina (Diptera).—Mem. Lond. Sch. Hyg. trop. Med. no. 10, 816 pp.Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. P., Kimber, C. D. & Bailey, N. M. (1967). Identification of the blood meals of blood-sucking insects. In International Scientific Council for Trypanosomiasis Research. Eleventh Meeting, Nairobi, 1966.—Publ. scient. tech. Res. Commn, Org. Afr.Unity no. 100, 121–122.Google Scholar
Curtis, C. F. & Langley, P. A. (1972). Use of nitrogen and chilling in the production of radiation-induced sterility in the tsetse fly Glossina morsitans.—Entomologia exp. appl. 15, 360–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dame, D. A., Birkenmeyer, D. R., Nash, T. A. M. & Jordan, A. M. (1975). The dispersal and survival of laboratory-bred and native Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. (Diptera, Glossinidae) in the field.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emslie, V. W. & Steinberg, E. A. (1973). The production in the bovine of antibody specific for closely related species and the use of such antisera in the identification of tsetse blood meals.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 67, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, R. W. (1939). Studies in the physiology and behaviour of Glossina morsitans Westw.—Mem. Dep. Agric. S. Rhod. no. 1, 203 pp.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1933). On a method of marking tsetse flies.—J, anim. Ecol. 2, 289–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1946). An artificially isolated generation of tsetse flies (Diptera).—Bull. ent. Res. 37, 291–299.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. H. N. (1948). Some further isolated generations of tsetse flies.—Bull. ent. Res. 39, 441–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, C. H. N. (1950). Wet season fraying of wings of tsetse flies, Glossina morsitans.—Bull. ent. Res. 41, 159–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. M. (1974). Recent developments in the ecology and methods of control of tsetse flies (Glossina spp.) (Dipt. Glossinidae)—a review.—Bull. ent. Res. 63, 361–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. M. & Curtis, C. F. (1972). Productivity of Glossina morsitans Westwood maintained in the laboratory, with particular reference to the sterile-insect release method.—Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 46, 33–38.Google Scholar
Jordan, A. M., Nash, T. A. M. & Trewern, M. A. (1970). The performance of crosses between wild and laboratory-bred Glossina morsitans orientalis Vanderplank.—Bull. ent. Res. 60, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kernaghan, R. J. & Nash, T. A. M. (1964). A technique for the dispatch of pupae of Glossina and other insects by air from the tropics.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 58, 355–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langley, P. A. & Pimley, R. W. (1975). Quantitative aspects of reproduction and larval nutrition in Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. (Diptera, Glossinidae) fed in vitro.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, A. R., Baumgartner, H., Luger, D. & Offori, E. D. (1976). Colonisation of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. (Diptera, Glossinidae) in the laboratory using in vitro feeding techniques.—Bull. ent. Res. 65, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, A. R., Langley, P. A., Pimley, R. W. & Flood, M. E. T. (1975). The use of pig blood in the rearing of Glossina morsitans morsitans in the absence of a living host.—Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 69, 279–280.Google Scholar
Nash, T. A. M. (1955). The fertilisation of Glossina palpalis in capivity.—Bull. ent. Res. 46, 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, T. A. M., Jordan, A. M. & Boyle, J. A. (1968). The large-scale rearing of Glossina austeni Newst. in the laboratory. IV.—The final technique.—Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 62, 336–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, R. J. & Clarke, G. P. Y. (1974). Seasonal elimination of some size classes in males of Glossina morsitans morsitans Westw. (Diptera, Glossinidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilson, R. D. & Pilson, B. M. (1967). Behaviour studies of Glossina morsitans Westw. in the field.—Bull. ent. Res. 57, 227–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, A. (1972). Studies on the mating of Glossina pallidipes Austen. I.—The age at mating. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 66, 515–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vale, G. A. (1971). Artificial refuges for tsetse flies (Glossina spp.).—Bull. ent. Res. 61, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A (1974 a). New field methods for studying the responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to hosts.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vale, G. A. (19746). The responses of tsetse flies (Diptera, Glossinidae) to mobile and stationary baits.—Bull. ent. Res. 64, 545–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar