Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:19:47.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Visual stimulus brightness influences the efficiency of attractant-baited traps for catching Drosophila suzukii Matsumura (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2024

Samuel Cruz-Esteban*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Centro Regional del Bajío, Red de Diversidad Biológica del Occidente Mexicano, 61600 Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México CONAHCYT, 03940 Ciudad de México, México
Edith Garay-Serrano
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Centro Regional del Bajío, Red de Diversidad Biológica del Occidente Mexicano, 61600 Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México CONAHCYT, 03940 Ciudad de México, México
Francisco J. González
Affiliation:
Coordinación para la Innovación y la Aplicación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, 78210 San Luis Potosí, SLP, Mexico
Julio C. Rojas*
Affiliation:
Grupo de Ecología Qímica, Departamento de Ecología de Artropodos y Manejo de Plagas, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, 30700 Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: Samuel Cruz-Esteban; Email: samuel.cruz@inecol.mx
Corresponding author: Samuel Cruz-Esteban; Email: samuel.cruz@inecol.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) is an exotic pest of economic importance that affects several soft-skinned fruits in Mexico. Previously, we found that yellow or yellow-green rectangular cards inside a transparent trap baited with attractants improved D. suzukii capture. In this study, we evaluated the influence of rectangular cards with different yellow shades inside a transparent multi-hole trap baited with apple cider vinegar (ACV) on D. suzukii capture in the field. Second, we tested whether ACV-baited traps with cards of other geometric shapes affected D. suzukii catches compared to traps with rectangular cards. Third, we evaluated the effects of commercial lures combined with a more efficient visual stimulus from previous experiments on trapping D. suzukii flies. We found that ACV-baited traps plus a yellow-shaded rectangle card with 67% reflectance at a 549.74 nm dominant wavelength captured more flies than ACV-baited traps with yellow rectangle cards with a higher reflectance. Overall, ACV-baited traps with rectangles and squares caught more flies than did ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli. The traps baited with SuzukiiLURE-Max, ACV and Z-Kinol plus yellow rectangles caught 57, 70 and 101% more flies, respectively, than the traps baited with the lure but without a visual stimulus.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Olfactory and visual cues function synergistically to increase insect attraction to host plants (Prokopy and Owens, Reference Prokopy and Owens1983; Campbell and Borden, Reference Campbell and Borden2009; Wenninger et al., Reference Wenninger, Stelinski and Hall2009; Burger et al., Reference Burger, Dötterl and Ayasse2010). The host choice of the vinegar fly spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumara) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), could be affected by several stimuli associated with fruit ripening, including size, shape, colour, volatile profiles, skin firmness, sweetness and acidity (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Bruck, Dreves, Ioriatti, Vogt and Baufeld2011, Reference Lee, Dreves, Cave, Kawai, Isaacs, Miller, Steven and Bruck2015; Burrack et al., Reference Burrack, Fernandez, Spivey and Kraus2013; Poyet et al., Reference Poyet, Le Roux, Gibert, Meirland, Prevost, Eslin and Chabrerie2015; Entling et al., Reference Entling, Anslinger, Jarausch, Michl and Hoffmann2019; Little et al., Reference Little, Dixon, Chapman and Hillier2020). Some of these characteristics have been used to design lures and traps for monitoring both sexes of D. suzukii in the field (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Bruck, Dreves, Ioriatti, Vogt and Baufeld2011, Reference Lee, Dalton, Swoboda-Bhattarai, Bruck, Burrack, Strik, Woltz and Walton2016; Kirkpatrick et al., Reference Kirkpatrick, McGhee, Hermann, Gut and Miller2016, Reference Kirkpatrick, Gut and Miller2018; Cha et al., Reference Cha, Landolt and Adams2017, Reference Cha, Landolt and Adams2017; Cloonan et al., Reference Cloonan, Abraham, Angeli, Syed and Rodriguez-Saona2018; Little et al., Reference Little, Rizzato, Charbonneau, Chapman and Hillier2019; Cruz-Esteban et al., Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano, Rodríguez and Rojas2021a, Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano and Rojas2021b).

The influence of colour on trapping D. suzukii is a disputable issue because published results are inconsistent and, in some cases, contradictory (Basoalto et al., Reference Basoalto, Hilton and Knight2013; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Shearer, Barrantes, Beers, Burrack, Dalton, Dreves, Gut, Hamby, Haviland, Isaacs, Nielsen, Richardson, Rodriguez-Saona, Stanley, Walsh, Walton, Yee, Zalom and Bruck2013; Iglesias et al., Reference Iglesias, Nyoike and Liburd2014; Renkema et al., Reference Renkema, Buitenhuis and Hallett2014; Kirkpatrick et al., Reference Kirkpatrick, McGhee, Hermann, Gut and Miller2016; Rice et al., Reference Rice, Short, Jones and Leskey2016; Lasa et al., Reference Lasa, Tadeo, Toledo-Hérnandez, Carmona, Lima and Williams2017). For instance, Lee et al. (Reference Lee, Shearer, Barrantes, Beers, Burrack, Dalton, Dreves, Gut, Hamby, Haviland, Isaacs, Nielsen, Richardson, Rodriguez-Saona, Stanley, Walsh, Walton, Yee, Zalom and Bruck2013) reported that yellow traps hung in shady spots and spaced 2–3 m apart caught more D. suzukii flies than did clear traps. In contrast, Renkema et al. (Reference Renkema, Buitenhuis and Hallett2014) found that red and black traps captured more D. suzukii flies than did clear and yellow traps. However, a colour is determined not only by its hue (e.g. green, red, blue or yellow), but also by two additional perceptual colour dimensions: saturation (saturation/chroma) and brightness (light intensity) (Wyszecki and Stiles, Reference Wyszecki and Stiles2000). Little et al. (Reference Little, Rizzato, Charbonneau, Chapman and Hillier2019) proposed that colour contrast, rather than colour appearance, might be of greater significance during the attraction of D. suzukii to host fruits. They concluded that differences in reflectance within opponent colour pairs promoted colour discrimination in D. suzukii. Colour contrast is defined as the perceptual contrast in the colour appearance of two objects (e.g. a flower and a green leaf) (van der Kooi and Spaethe, Reference van Der Kooi and Spaethe2022). We previously determined that neither trap design nor trap colour had a significant influence on the attraction and capture of D. suzukii in cultivated berry fields (Cruz-Esteban et al., Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano, Rodríguez and Rojas2021a, Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano and Rojas2021b). In these studies, we found no significant differences in the capture of both sexes of D. suzukii by attractant-baited transparent, red or red-black traps. Furthermore, attractant-baited transparent traps with a rectangular yellow card inside as a visual stimulus captured more D. suzukii flies than transparent traps without visual stimulus (Cruz-Esteban, Reference Cruz-Esteban2021). However, it is not yet known whether the reflectance of specific shades of yellow rectangular cards or geometric shapes affects the catches of D. suzukii flies using attractant-baited traps.

In this study, we evaluated the influence of rectangular cards with different yellow shades inside a transparent multi-hole trap baited with apple cider vinegar (ACV) on D. suzukii capture in the field. Second, we tested whether ACV-baited traps with cards of other geometric shapes affected D. suzukii catches compared to traps with rectangular cards. Third, we evaluated the effects of commercial lures combined with a more efficient visual stimulus from previous experiments on trapping D. suzukii flies.

Materials and methods

Field tests

Three field experiments were performed in blackberry crops covered with polytunnels in Tiripetio (19° 31′ 55″ N, 101° 22′ 10″ W) in the Municipality of Morelia, Michoacan, and in uncovered crops in Tacambaro of Codallos (19° 12′ 18.35″ N, 101° 26′ 52.44″ W), Michoacan. The first experiment was conducted in March 2021, the second in June 2021 and the third in October 2022. During the experiments, the crops exhibited fruits at different maturity levels.

Traps

Multi-hole transparent traps were used for the three field trials. The traps consisted of cylindrical plastic containers (14 cm high × 10.5 cm diameter) with flat lids (Plastics Adheribles del Bajío, León, Mexico). Approximately 50 holes (2.5 mm diameter) were distributed on the top and sides of the container to allow insect entry (Cruz-Esteban et al., Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano, Rodríguez and Rojas2021a).

Effect of yellow shades on trapping D. suzukii flies

In the first experiment, the effects of six different human yellow shades (hereafter yellow-1–yellow-6; see fig. S1; Cartulina Jiss Color Plus, Mexico) as visual stimuli on trapping D. suzukii flies were evaluated. We added a cardboard rectangle (5 × 8 cm) of one of the yellow shades to be evaluated inside each trap. All traps were baited with ACV (5% acetic acid; La Costeña, Ecatepec, Mexico) as an attractant and drowning solution. The spectral reflectance curves of the different yellow shades were measured using a spectrometer (USB4000-VIS-NIR, Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA) with an optical resolution of approximately 1.5 nm (full width at half maximum), a tungsten-halogen light source (LS-1, Ocean Optics) and a reflection probe (R200-7-VIS-NIR, Ocean Optics). Raw reflectance spectra were corrected for the dark current of the detector and normalised to the spectrum obtained from the light source reflected by a white reference standard. This figure was constructed using the reflectance value determined for each colour from 400 to 1000 nm.

Influence of geometric shapes on trapping D. suzukii flies

In the second experiment, we evaluated the influence of different geometric shapes, in contrast to a dark background, on D. suzukii catches (fig. S2). The geometric shapes were made of yellow cardboard, using the shade that presented the highest catches of D. suzukii flies in the first experiment. A dark green card (5 cm × 8 cm) was used as the background for the geometric shapes. The geometric shapes evaluated were circle (4 cm in diameter), half circle (4 cm in diameter), square (4 × 4 cm), rhombus (3 cm per side) and triangle (4 cm per side). A yellow-4 card (5 × 8 cm) without a green background was used as the positive control. Traps with yellow-4 shade showed the highest capture rate in the first experiment. All traps were baited with ACV. A trap without visual stimulus was used as the control.

Effect of lure type combined with a yellow rectangle on trapping D. suzukii flies

In this study, we evaluated the effect of commercial lures combined with a more efficient yellow shade rectangle from previous experiments on trapping D. suzukii flies. The first lure was Z-Kinol (Squid Biological and Pheromones S.A. de C.V., Mexico), which was formulated using acetoin, methionol, acetic acid and ethanol. The drowning solution consisted of 250 ml water containing odourless soap (0.5%). This lure is highly attractive to populations of D. suzukii in Mexico (Cruz-Esteban et al., Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano, Rodríguez and Rojas2021a). The second lure was SuzukiiLURE-Max (Dinusa, Oaxaca, Mexico), a liquid food bait composed of amino acids and fruit ferments. SuzukiiLURE-Max acted as attractant and drowning solution. ACV was used as a control. The three lures (Z-Kinol, SuzukiiLURE-Max, and ACV) were evaluated with and without a yellow card inside the traps.

Experimental design

The experimental design in all trials was a randomised complete block design, replicated in four blocks. Each block contained all treatments in each experiment. The blocks were arranged in parallel lines (transects) 30 m apart within blueberry fields. The traps were placed 1 m above the ground within each block between the plants, and the distance between the traps was 30 m. In all experiments, traps were inspected, emptied and rotated clockwise within the same block every 3 days, for 21 weeks. The drowning solution was adjusted to the initial volume after the traps were checked. Z-Kinol lures were not changed during the experimental period. The captured flies were taken to the Instituto de Ecologia A.C. (Patzcuaro, Michoacan, Mexico) for identification, sexing and counting. Species identification and sex differentiation were carried out based on the identification characteristics provided by the Collection of Insects Associated with Cultivated Plants of ECOSUR (Tapachula Unit) and Miller et al. (Reference Miller, Marshall and Grimaldi2017). Voucher specimens were deposited in the insect collection of ECOSUR and the Instituto de Ecologia A.C.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using the statistical software R version 4.3.1 (R Development Core Team, 2023). Catches by sex were compared using the χ2 test with Yates correction using the DescTools package (Signorell et al., Reference Signorell, Aho, Alfons, Anderegg, Aragon and Arppe2016). The captures/trap/day of D. suzukii flies were analysed using the linear mixed-effects model, with treatments and dates as fixed effects (α < 0.05) and blocks as random effects. The models met the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity. The nlme and effects packages were used (Fox and Weisberg, Reference Fox and Weisberg2018; Pinheiro et al., Reference Pinheiro, Bates, DebRoy and Sarkar2020). The means were separated using Tukey's test (α < 0.05) with the agricolae package (De Mendiburu and Simon, Reference De Mendiburu and Simon2015).

Results

Effect of yellow shades on trapping D. suzukii flies

The spectral reflectance patterns of the cards differed among the yellow shades (fig. 1). All shades had two reflectance peaks, one between 451 and 453 nm and another between 518 and 578 nm. Yellow-1 had an 88.39% reflection at 520.23 nm dominant wavelength, yellow-2 had 92.68% reflection at 530.34 nm dominant wavelength, yellow-3 had 88.38% reflection at 578.61 nm dominant wavelength, yellow-4 had 66.63% reflection at 549.74 nm dominant wavelength, yellow-5 had 91.05% reflection at 518.78 nm dominant wavelength and yellow-6 had 97.68% reflection at 518.78 nm dominant wavelength.

Figure 1. Spectral reflectance curves of different yellow shades used in the experiment of visual stimuli on trapping D. suzukii flies.

In this experiment, more D. suzukii females than males were captured in both study regions: 52.4% (χ2 = 15.5, P < 0.001) and 63.4% (χ2 = 177.8, P < 0.001) in Tiripetio and Tacambaro, respectively. In both study regions, the catch of D. suzukii was significantly affected by the treatment and date. The interaction between the treatment and date was also significant (table 1). In Tiripetio, ACV-baited traps with yellow-4 rectangular cards captured more D. suzukii than ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli. Catches in ACV-baited traps with other yellow shade cards were not significantly different from those in ACV-baited traps with yellow-4 cards or ACV-baited traps without cards (fig. 2a). In Tacambaro, ACV-baited traps with yellow-4 rectangular cards captured more D. suzukii than ACV-baited traps with other yellow cards or those without visual stimuli (fig. 2b). During the experiment, ACV-baited traps with yellow-4 cards had the highest capture on all monitoring dates in both the regions (fig. 3a, b). ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli had the lowest catches, except for Tacambaro, where ACV-baited traps with yellow-1 and yellow-5 cards had the lowest captures in the last 3 weeks (fig. 3a, b).

Table 1. Fitting linear mixed-effects model (LMMs) for the capture of drosophilids

Figure 2. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured in the two regions evaluated with traps with visual stimuli of different yellow shades in its inside (yellow-1–yellow-6, see fig. S1). (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. The bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey's test, α = 0.05).

Figure 3. Interaction graph between treatment and date monitored in the captures of D. suzukii in both regions evaluated (yellow-1–yellow-6 = different yellow shades, see fig. S1). (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. 1 = March 8, 2 = March 11, 3 = March 14, 4 = March 17, 5 = March 20 and 6 = March 23, of the year 2021.

Influence of geometric shapes on trapping D. suzukii flies

In the second experiment, more D. suzukii females than males were captured in both study regions; in Tiripetio, 58.6% females and 41.4% males (χ2 = 293.9, P < 0.001), and in Tacambaro, 59.1% females and 40.9% males (χ2 = 259.3, P < 0.001). In both study regions, the catch of D. suzukii was significantly affected by the treatment and date. However, the interaction between the treatment and date was not significant (table 1). In Tiripetio, ACV-baited traps plus yellow rectangular cards or green cards with yellow square shapes caught more flies than ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli. The number of flies caught in ACV-baited traps with green cards plus yellow circular, half-circular, diamond or triangular shapes and ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli was not significantly different from each other (fig. 4a). In Tacambaro, ACV-baited traps plus rectangular yellow cards and green cards plus yellow square, diamond and triangular shapes captured more flies than ACV-baited traps with green cards plus yellow circular and half-circular shapes, and ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli. The number of flies captured in ACV-baited traps with green cards plus yellow circular and half-circular shapes and ACV-baited traps without visual stimuli was not significantly different from each other (fig. 4b). The highest catches of D. suzukii in both regions occurred during the first 2 weeks of sampling. However, in Tacambaro, capture increased during the last week (fig. 5a, b).

Figure 4. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured in the two regions assessed with traps with visual stimuli inside. Visual stimuli were geometric figures (yellow-4) in a single plane on a dark background (see fig. S2): (a) Tiripetio, Michoacán, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).

Figure 5. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured on the different monitoring dates in the two study regions bye traps with visual stimuli of geometric figures in a single plane on a dark background. (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacán. 1 = June 7, 2 = June 10, 3 = June 13, 4 = June 16, 5 = June 19 and 6 = June 22, of the year 2021. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).

Effect of lure type combined with a yellow card on trapping D. suzukii flies

In the third experiment, more female than male D. suzukii were captured in both study regions. In Tiripetio, 56.1% were females, and 43.9% were males (χ2 = 350.8, P < 0.001), and in Tacambaro, 55.5% were females, and 44.5% were males (χ2 = 373.4, P < 0.001). In both study regions, the catch of D. suzukii was significantly affected by the treatment and date. The interaction between the treatment and date was also significant (table 1). In both regions, traps baited with Z-Kinol plus a visual stimulus captured more flies than traps baited with the other two attractants, with or without visual stimulus (fig. 6a, b). Traps baited with SuzukiiLURE-Max plus a yellow card caught 57% more flies than traps baited with a lure but without a yellow card. Traps baited with ACV plus a yellow card caught 70% more flies than traps baited with ACV but without a yellow card. Traps baited with Z-Kinol plus a yellow card captured 101% more flies than traps baited with a lure but without a yellow card (fig. 6a, b). Overall, the highest capture of D. suzukii flies occurred during the first week of the experiment (fig. 7a, b).

Figure 6. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured in the two regions assessed with traps bated commercial lures only and combined with a more efficient yellow shade rectangle from previous experiments on trapping flies. (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).

Figure 7. Interaction graph between treatment and date monitored in the captures of D. suzukii in both regions evaluated. (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. 1 = October 3, 2 = October 6, 3 = October 9, 4 = October 12, 5 = October 15 and 6 = October 18, of the year 2022.

Discussion

In this study, we found that the reflectance of the yellow card inside the transparent trap was a key factor affecting the capture of D. suzukii. Our results showed that yellow cards, with the lowest reflectance of all yellow shades tested, increased D. suzukii capture. However, the geometrical shape of the visual stimuli in contrasting green backgrounds does not seem to influence fly catches. We also found that the response of D. suzukii to visual cues is influenced by the type of lure used. Traps baited with Z-Kinol with a visual stimulus captured 101% more than traps baited with Z-Kinol alone. Traps with SuzukiiLURE-Max plus a visual cue caught 57% more flies than did those without visual cues. Traps with ACV and a visual stimulus caught 70% more than those without a visual stimulus.

Insect colour vision involves comparing the outputs of two or more photoreceptor classes that differ in their spectral sensitivity (van der Kooi et al., Reference van Der Kooi, Stavenga, Arikawa, Belušič and Kelber2021). Because photoreceptors often have overlapping sensitivity ranges, most wavelengths of light excite more than one class of photoreceptors, but to different degrees. Colour stimulus is estimated through opponent responses that measure arousal ratios between combinations of two or more photoreceptor classes (Skorupski and Chittka, Reference Skorupski and Chittka2011). Thus, initial colour vision depends on the number of photoreceptor classes, their spectral sensitivity and the opponent processing mechanisms exhibited by a given animal.

Visual detection of plants may involve the use of colour or other physical cues such as the size and shape of the hosts (Prokopy and Owens, Reference Prokopy and Owens1983). Thus, insects can only be attracted to the colour or form of the host plant (Reeves, Reference Reeves2011). For example, field experiments have shown that visual cues alone are sufficient to attract the leaf beetle Altica engstroemi (J. Sahlberg) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) when a choice between a bagged host plant and a bagged green dummy plant is presented (Stenberg and Ericson, Reference Stenberg and Ericson2007). However, attraction to visual cues generally occurs only with an appropriate olfactory stimulus (Parkes and Bruce, Reference Parkes and Bruce1961; Björklund et al., Reference Björklund, Nordlander and Bylund2005). In the absence of wind, mature Neoceratitis cyanescens (Bezzi) (Diptera: Tephritidae) females mostly use visual cues to find a host fruit. Under wind conditions, fruit odour increases the likelihood and speed of finding a host (Brévault and Quilici, Reference Brévault and Quilici2010). In a wind tunnel, when a visual model was offered without ACV, Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) flies maintained an upwind flight but did not approach the visual model. However, the model became attractive to flies when AVC was released. Before landing, flies aligned themselves along the plume axis as they approached the visual model with the ACV, whereas their flight towards the model without odour was not directed along any specific axis (Saxena et al., Reference Saxena, Natesan and Sane2018). Visual cues can also induce landing on host plants. Hessian fly females, Mayetolia destructor (Say) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), landed more often on a target size of 8 × 8 cm than on smaller targets (Harris et al., Reference Harris, Rose and Malsch1993). In choice tests, between bright orange spheres, mature N. cyanescens females landed more often on 7.5 cm diameter models than on the 3.7 and 1.9 cm diameter ones (Brévault and Quilici, Reference Brévault and Quilici2007). Because our results were obtained from endpoint experiments, we did not know whether the flies were attracted to the colour, induced to land or both. However, we previously reported that unbaited coloured traps did not capture D. suzukii under field conditions (Cruz-Esteban et al., Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano, Rodríguez and Rojas2021a). Nevertheless, it is difficult to determine whether insects respond to chemical or visual cues at a distance or if catching is the result of short-range arrest in trapping experiments (Eigenbrode and Bernays, Reference Eigenbrode, Bernays, Dent and Walton1997). Further experiments should be performed using direct observations to investigate the response of D. suzukii to traps.

In our study, we found significant differences among the visual stimuli tested only in the open-field trial. Trap catches with yellow-4 visual stimuli were higher than those with the other evaluated yellow shades. In the crop under the tunnel trial, captures by traps with yellow-4 were only higher than those captured by traps without visual stimuli, but not by traps with other yellow shades. In the open field, sunlight fully penetrated the plants compared with polytunnel-protected cultivation, where sunlight penetration was obstructed. Thus, the amount of light reflected by the yellow cards varied from one experiment to another. In a natural setting, traps are subjected to a large variety of illumination conditions, owing to weather conditions, daylight cycles and landscape components that emit shadows (Domingues et al., Reference Domingues, Brandão and Ferreira2022). For example, shadows from cherry leaves and branches in yellow traps influence the catches of Rhagoletis cerasi (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae) (Daniel et al., Reference Daniel, Mathis and Feichtinger2014). Thus, the location of traps within a habitat can affect their performance (Ozanne, Reference Ozanne and Cuero2005). However, our results showed that the influence of the appropriate colour inside the traps for the capture of D. suzukii is important. Yudin et al. (Reference Yudin, Mitchell and Cho1987) reported that insect colour perception is an important trait when optimising trap design.

Contrast is a key component of stimulus visibility, and single-colour traps rely on background contrast, which differs between crop growth and light environments (Dearden et al., Reference Dearden, Wood, Frend, Butt and Allen2023). In our results, the one-dimensional geometric shapes placed on the green cards inside the traps did not affect the capture of D. suzukii in the openfield culture and were protected with polytunnels. Therefore, the background contrast that the crop offers to the trap with a yellow card could be of greater importance. In previous research, Rice et al. (Reference Rice, Short, Jones and Leskey2016) found that flies did not exhibit a significant preference for different three-dimensional shapes without chemical stimuli, such as spheres, cubes, pyramids, inverted pyramids, vertical or horizontal cylinders. However, they did demonstrate a preference for traps due to their colours and sizes. On the other hand, the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) showed a preference for yellow colour in the form of one-dimensional circles against a dark background (Mainali and Lim, Reference Mainali and Lim2010). In a more recent study, F. occidentalis exhibited a preference for shades of blue and yellow, which have lower reflectance compared to its other tones. Nevertheless, this preference did not extend to geometric shapes of these colours when presented in one dimension and contrasting against dark backgrounds (Dearden et al., Reference Dearden, Wood, Frend, Butt and Allen2023).

The volatile chemical compounds emitted by plants are the main cues used by many phytophagous insects during their orientation towards host plants. Previous studies have identified compounds derived from fermentation such as acetoin, methionol, acetic acid and ethanol that have been highly attractive to D. suzukii flies in the field (Cha et al., Reference Cha, Adams, Werle, Sampson, Adamczyk, Rogg and Landolt2014, Reference Cha, Hesler, Park, Adams, Zack, Rogg and Landolt2015, Reference Cha, Landolt and Adams2017). Likewise, D. suzukii flies are attracted to fermented products such as hydrolysed proteins (SuzukiiTrap) and ACV (Cruz-Esteban et al., Reference Cruz-Esteban, Garay-Serrano, Rodríguez and Rojas2021a). In this study, Z-Kinol, a highly effective product developed based on the studies by Cha et al. (Reference Cha, Adams, Werle, Sampson, Adamczyk, Rogg and Landolt2014, Reference Cha, Hesler, Park, Adams, Zack, Rogg and Landolt2015, Reference Cha, Landolt and Adams2017), and a SuzukiiLURE-Max hydrolysed protein made from fruit ferments were used. Both products were effective in attracting and capturing D. suzukii. However, SuzukiiLURE-Max, which acts as an attractant and drowning solution, decreases its attractive action after the first 2 weeks, which does not occur with Z-Kinol, which has a polyethylene releaser that allows a more controlled emission of volatile compounds. SuzukiiLURE-Max is not contained in a system that regulates the emission of attractive volatile compounds. Therefore, volatiles can easily evaporate and mix with the decomposition compounds from captured insects, which could interfere with the attractive effect of the SuzukiiLURE-Max bait (Hampton et al., Reference Hampton, Koski, Barsoian, Faubert, Cowles and Alm2014; Iglesias et al., Reference Iglesias, Nyoike and Liburd2014; Frewin et al., Reference Frewin, Renkema, Fraser and Hallett2017).

The fact that D. suzukii flies were captured mostly by traps baited Z-Kinol and with a yellow card may be due first to the effective long-distance chemical attraction that the baits offered, and then to the low reflectance offered by the visual stimulus (66.63% reflection at 549.74 nm dominant wavelength) at a short distance. This result agrees with that reported by Little et al. (Reference Little, Dixon, Chapman and Hillier2020), who found that fruits that offered less reflectance were the most attractive to D. suzukii females in the laboratory.

For many insect pests, insecticide use can be reduced by using traps to monitor populations and ensure timely targeted intervention (Muvea et al., Reference Muvea, Waiganjo, Kutima, Osiemo, Nyasani and Subramanian2014; Sampson et al., Reference Sampson, Bennison and Kirk2021; van Tol et al., Reference van Tol, Tom, Roher, Schreurs and Van Dooremalen2021). Similarly, traps can be deployed on a large scale for mass capture as an alternative or complementary control measure (Mouden et al., Reference Mouden, Sarmiento, Klinkhamer and Leiss2017; Reitz et al., Reference Reitz, Gao, Kirk, Hoddle, Leiss and Funderburk2020). Therefore, there is an urgent need to ensure that traps work as efficiently as possible for the monitoring and mass capture of insect pests (Dearden et al., Reference Dearden, Wood, Frend, Butt and Allen2023). Our results add to this effort by optimising an effective trap for monitoring and massive trapping of D. suzukii in berry crops.

In conclusion, our results show that a specific visual stimulus improves the attraction and capture of D. suzukii in blueberry crops. Bright yellow (yellow-4), which exhibited the lowest reflectance, proved to be the most suitable visual stimulus because it acted synergistically with the evaluated attractants. These findings are relevant for enhancing monitoring systems and mass capture of D. suzukii in berry crops.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000706

Acknowledgments

We thank Rogelio Castañeda Godoy, Technical Manager Koppert Biological System for allowing us to work in the experimental fields of berries under his care. Dominga Edith Peñalosa Herrera for her support in the field work and laboratory assistance.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the studies were conducted.

References

Basoalto, E, Hilton, R and Knight, A (2013) Factors affecting the efficacy of a vinegar trap for Drosophila suzikii (Diptera; Drosophilidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 137, 561570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Björklund, N, Nordlander, G and Bylund, H (2005) Olfactory and visual stimuli used in orientation to conifer seedlings by the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Physiological Entomology 30, 225231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brévault, T and Quilici, S (2007) Visual response of the tomato fruit fly, Neoceratitis cyanescens, to colored fruit models. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125, 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brévault, T and Quilici, S (2010) Interaction between visual and olfactory cues during host finding in the tomato fruit fly Neoceratitis cyanescens. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36, 249259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burger, H, Dötterl, S and Ayasse, M (2010) Host-plant finding and recognition by visual and olfactory floral cues in an oligolectic bee. Functional Ecology 24, 12341240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrack, H, Fernandez, G, Spivey, T and Kraus, D (2013) Variation in selection and utilization of host crops in the field and laboratory by Drosophila suzukii Matsumara (Diptera: Drosophilidae), an invasive frugivore. Pest Management Science 69, 11731180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A and Borden, J (2009) Additive and synergistic integration of multimodal cues of both hosts and non-host during host selection by woodboring insects. Oikos 118, 553563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, DH, Adams, T, Werle, CT, Sampson, BJ, Adamczyk, JJ Jr, Rogg, H and Landolt, PJ (2014) A four-component synthetic attractant for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) isolated from fermented bait headspace. Pest Management Science 70, 324331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cha, DH, Hesler, SP, Park, S, Adams, TB, Zack, RS, Rogg, H and Landolt, PJ (2015) Simpler is better: fewer non-target insects trapped with a four-component chemical lure vs. a chemically more complex food-type bait for Drosophila suzukii. Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata 154, 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, DH, Landolt, PJ and Adams, TB (2017) Effect of chemical ratios of a microbial-based feeding attractant on trap catch of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environmental Entomology 46, 907915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloonan, KR, Abraham, J, Angeli, S, Syed, Z and Rodriguez-Saona, C (2018) Advances in the chemical ecology of the spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii) and its applications. Journal of Chemical Ecology 44, 922939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cruz-Esteban, S (2021) It is not the color of the trap, but the color as a close-range stimulus inside the trap that increases capture of Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in berry crops. Crop Protection 141, 105449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz-Esteban, S, Garay-Serrano, E, Rodríguez, C and Rojas, JC (2021a) The attractant, but not the trap design, affects the capture of Drosophila suzukii in berry crops. Bulletin of Entomological Research 111, 138145.10.1017/S0007485320000401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz-Esteban, S, Garay-Serrano, E and Rojas, JC (2021b) Effect of visual cues and a fermentation-based attractant blend on trap catch of two invasive Drosophila flies in Berry Crops in Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology 114, 152160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, C, Mathis, S and Feichtinger, G (2014) A new visual trap for Rhagoletis cerasi (L.) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Insects 5, 564576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dearden, AE, Wood, MJ, Frend, HO, Butt, TM and Allen, WL (2023) Visual modelling can optimise the appearance and capture efficiency of sticky traps used to manage insect pests. Journal of Pest Science, 111.Google Scholar
De Mendiburu, F and Simon, R (2015) Agricolae – ten years of an open source statistical tool for experiments in breeding, agriculture and biology. PeerJ, 117. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1404v1. PrePrints 3, e1404v1.Google Scholar
Domingues, T, Brandão, T and Ferreira, JC (2022) Machine learning for detection and prediction of crop diseases and pests: a comprehensive survey. Agriculture 12, 1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eigenbrode, SD and Bernays, EA (1997) Evaluation of factors affecting host plant selection, with an emphasis on studying behaviour. In Dent, DR and Walton, MP (eds), Methods in Ecological & Agricultural Entomology. New York: CAB International, pp. 147169.Google Scholar
Entling, W, Anslinger, S, Jarausch, B, Michl, G and Hoffmann, C (2019) Berry skin resistance explains oviposition preferences of Drosophila suzukii at the level of grape cultivars and single berries. Journal of Pest Science 92, 477484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J and Weisberg, S (2018) An R Companion to Applied Regression. McMaster University, Canada and University of Minnesota, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Frewin, AJ, Renkema, J, Fraser, H and Hallett, RH (2017) Evaluation of attractants for monitoring Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 110, 11561163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, E, Koski, C, Barsoian, O, Faubert, H, Cowles, RS and Alm, SR (2014) Use of early ripening cultivars to avoid infestation and mass trapping to manage Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Vaccinium corymbosum (Ericales: Ericaceae). Journal of Economical Entomology 107, 18491857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, MO, Rose, S and Malsch, P (1993) The role of vision in the host plant-finding behaviour of the Hessian fly. Physiological Entomology 18, 3142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias, LE, Nyoike, TW and Liburd, OE (2014) Effect of trap design, bait type, and age on captures of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in berry crops. Journal of Economical Entomology 107, 15081518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, DM, McGhee, PS, Hermann, SL, Gut, LJ and Miller, JR (2016) Alightment of spotted wing drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on odorless disks varying in color. Environmental Entomology 45, 185191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, DM, Gut, LJ and Miller, JR (2018) Development of a novel dry, sticky trap design incorporating visual cues for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 111, 17751779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasa, R, Tadeo, E, Toledo-Hérnandez, RA, Carmona, L, Lima, I and Williams, T (2017) Improved capture of Drosophila suzukii by a trap baited with two attractants in the same device. PLoS ONE 12, e0188350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JC, Bruck, DJ, Dreves, AJ, Ioriatti, C, Vogt, H and Baufeld, P (2011) In focus: spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii, across perspectives. Pest Management Science 67, 13491351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J, Shearer, P, Barrantes, L, Beers, E, Burrack, H, Dalton, D, Dreves, A, Gut, L, Hamby, K, Haviland, D, Isaacs, R, Nielsen, A, Richardson, T, Rodriguez-Saona, C, Stanley, C, Walsh, D, Walton, V, Yee, W, Zalom, F and Bruck, D (2013) Trap designs for monitoring Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Environmental Entomology 42, 13481355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JC, Dreves, AJ, Cave, AM, Kawai, S, Isaacs, R, Miller, JC, Steven, VT and Bruck, DJ (2015) Infestation of wild and ornamental noncrop fruits by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 108, 117129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JC, Dalton, DT, Swoboda-Bhattarai, KA, Bruck, DJ, Burrack, HJ, Strik, BC, Woltz, M and Walton, VM (2016) Characterization and manipulation of fruit susceptibility to Drosophila suzukii. Journal of Pest Science 89, 771780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, CM, Rizzato, AR, Charbonneau, L, Chapman, T and Hillier, NK (2019) Color preference of the spotted wing Drosophila, Drosophila suzukii. Scientific Reports 9, 16051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, CM, Dixon, PL, Chapman, TW and Hillier, NK (2020) Role of fruit characters and colour on host selection of boreal fruits and berries by Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). The Canadian Entomologist 152, 546562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainali, BP and Lim, UT (2010) Circular yellow sticky trap with black background enhances attraction of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande)(Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 45, 207213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, ME, Marshall, SA and Grimaldi, DA (2017) A review of the species of Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and genera of drosophilidae of Northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification 31, 1282.Google Scholar
Mouden, S, Sarmiento, KF, Klinkhamer, PG and Leiss, KA (2017) Integrated pest management in western flower thrips: past, present and future. Pest Management Science 73, 813822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muvea, AM, Waiganjo, MM, Kutima, HL, Osiemo, Z, Nyasani, JO and Subramanian, S (2014) Attraction of pest thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) infesting French beans to coloured sticky traps with Lurem-TR and its utility for monitoring thrips populations. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 34, 197206.Google Scholar
Ozanne, CM (2005) Techniques and methods for sampling canopy insects. In Cuero, SR (ed.), Insect Sampling in Forest Ecosystems. Ascot, Reino Unido: Silwood Park, pp. 146167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkes, AS and Bruce, HM (1961) Olfactory stimuli in mammalian reproduction: odor excites neurohumoral responses affecting oestrus, pseudopregnancy, and pregnancy in the mouse. Science 134, 10491054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, J, Bates, D, DebRoy, S, Sarkar, D and R Core Team (2020) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3, 111.Google Scholar
Poyet, M, Le Roux, V, Gibert, P, Meirland, A, Prevost, G, Eslin, P and Chabrerie, O (2015) The wide potential trophic niche of the Asiatic fruit fly Drosophila suzukii: the key of its invasion success in temperate Europe? PLoS ONE 10, e0142785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prokopy, RJ and Owens, ED (1983) Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28, 337364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reeves, JL (2011) Vision should not be overlooked as an important sensory modality for finding host plants. Environmental Entomology 40, 855863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitz, SR, Gao, Y, Kirk, WD, Hoddle, MS, Leiss, KA and Funderburk, JE (2020) Invasion biology, ecology, and management of western flower thrips. Annual Review of Entomology 65, 1737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renkema, JM, Buitenhuis, R and Hallett, RH (2014) Optimizing trap design and trapping protocols for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Journal of Economical Entomology 107, 21072118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K, Short, B, Jones, S and Leskey, T (2016) Behavioral responses of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) to visual stimuli under laboratory, semifield, and field conditions. Environmental Entomology 45, 14801488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, C, Bennison, J and Kirk, WD (2021) Overwintering of the western flower thrips in outdoor strawberry crops. Journal of Pest Science 94, 143152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, N, Natesan, D and Sane, SP (2018) Odor source localization in complex visual environments by fruit flies. Journal of Experimental Biology 221, jeb172023.Google ScholarPubMed
Signorell, A, Aho, K, Alfons, A, Anderegg, N, Aragon, T and Arppe, A (2016) DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0. 99, 18.Google Scholar
Skorupski, P and Chittka, L (2011) Is colour cognitive? Optics & Laser Technology 43, 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenberg, JA and Ericson, L (2007) Visual cues override olfactory cues in the host-finding process of the monophagous leaf beetle Altica engstroemi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125, 8188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Der Kooi, CJ and Spaethe, J (2022) Caution with colour calculations: spectral purity is a poor descriptor of flower colour visibility. Annals of Botany 130, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Der Kooi, CJ, Stavenga, DG, Arikawa, K, Belušič, G and Kelber, A (2021) Evolution of insect color vision: from spectral sensitivity to visual ecology. Annual Review of Entomology 66, 435461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Tol, RW, Tom, J, Roher, M, Schreurs, A and Van Dooremalen, C (2021) Haze of glue determines preference of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) for yellow or blue traps. Scientific Reports 11, 6557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenninger, EJ, Stelinski, LL and Hall, DG (2009) Roles of olfactory cues, visual cues, and mating status in orientation of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) to four different host plants. Environmental Entomology 38, 225234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wyszecki, G and Stiles, WS (2000) Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, Vol. 40. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1116.Google Scholar
Yudin, LS, Mitchell, WC and Cho, JJ (1987) Color preference of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) with reference to aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) and leafminers in Hawaiian lettuce farms. Journal of Economic Entomology 80, 5155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Spectral reflectance curves of different yellow shades used in the experiment of visual stimuli on trapping D. suzukii flies.

Figure 1

Table 1. Fitting linear mixed-effects model (LMMs) for the capture of drosophilids

Figure 2

Figure 2. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured in the two regions evaluated with traps with visual stimuli of different yellow shades in its inside (yellow-1–yellow-6, see fig. S1). (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. The bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey's test, α = 0.05).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Interaction graph between treatment and date monitored in the captures of D. suzukii in both regions evaluated (yellow-1–yellow-6 = different yellow shades, see fig. S1). (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. 1 = March 8, 2 = March 11, 3 = March 14, 4 = March 17, 5 = March 20 and 6 = March 23, of the year 2021.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured in the two regions assessed with traps with visual stimuli inside. Visual stimuli were geometric figures (yellow-4) in a single plane on a dark background (see fig. S2): (a) Tiripetio, Michoacán, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).

Figure 5

Figure 5. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured on the different monitoring dates in the two study regions bye traps with visual stimuli of geometric figures in a single plane on a dark background. (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacán. 1 = June 7, 2 = June 10, 3 = June 13, 4 = June 16, 5 = June 19 and 6 = June 22, of the year 2021. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Mean number (±SE) of D. suzukii captured in the two regions assessed with traps bated commercial lures only and combined with a more efficient yellow shade rectangle from previous experiments on trapping flies. (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. Bars with the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey test, α = 0.05).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Interaction graph between treatment and date monitored in the captures of D. suzukii in both regions evaluated. (a) Tiripetio, Michoacan, and (b) Tacambaro, Michoacan. 1 = October 3, 2 = October 6, 3 = October 9, 4 = October 12, 5 = October 15 and 6 = October 18, of the year 2022.

Supplementary material: File

Cruz-Esteban et al. supplementary material

Cruz-Esteban et al. supplementary material
Download Cruz-Esteban et al. supplementary material(File)
File 745.5 KB