Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:49:54.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Yield of Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Col., Anobiidae) from a given Quantity of Foodstuff.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

J. O. Bull  and
M. E. Solomon
J. O. Bull
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.
M. E. Solomon
Affiliation:
Department of Scientific & Industrial Research, Pest Infestation Laboratory, Slough, Bucks.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An experiment was designed to ascertain the maximum yield of adults of the Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.) that could be reared from a given quantity of foodstuff. Equal numbers of eggs of this species were added to batches of tubes containing different weights of wheatfeed, and the resulting adults were removed, counted and weighed.

The weights of wheatfeed had been chosen so that in some of the batches of tubes it would not be completely exploited. When emergence of adults was complete, further numbers of eggs, which were calculated to produce approximately the number of larvae necessary to complete the process in each batch of tubes, were then added, and the resulting adults again removed, counted and weighed.

The maximum biomass (wet weight) of adults of L. serricorne which could be reared from egg to adult per gramme of wheatfeed at 25°C. and 70 per cent. relative humidity was found to be 0.214 g. (108 to 129 specimens, all more or less undersized, and many with a retarded rate of development, compared with insects given ample food). In addition to the 21 per cent, of the food converted into adult insects, another 27 per cent. by weight of the original foodstuff was lost, presumably as water and carbon dioxide, leaving just over 50 per cent. undigested residue, most of which was faecal matter that would have passed through the insects at least once.

The yield of insects per g. loss of weight of the foodstuff was 0.46 g. (wet weights), which is very close to the corresponding figures calculated from the results of Fraenkel & Blewett for Dermestes maculatus Deg., Tribolium confusum Duv. and Ephestia Kuehniella Zell. on various foods, but three times as great as the corresponding figure calculated from Richards' results for Calandra granaria (L.) in wheat.

There was evidence suggesting that a truly maximal yield (slightly greater than in these experiments) might be attained by adding an optimal number of eggs to the food at the start, instead of adding a second population to an incompletely exploited food supply.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , March 1958 , pp. 193 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fraenkel, G.. & Blewett, M.. (1944). The utilisation of metabolic water in insects.—Bull. ent. Res., 35, pp. 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, D. L.. & Knight, R. H.. (1945). The biology and behaviour of Ptinus tectus Boie. (Coleoptera, Ptinidae), a pest of stored products.—J. exp. Biol., 21, pp. 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, R. W.. (1957). A laboratory study of the Cigarette Beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Col., Anobiidae) with a critical review of the literature on its biology.—Bull. ent. Res., 48, pp. 9–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J.. (1954). An outline of the dynamics of animal populations.— Aust. J. Zool., 2, pp. 9–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W.. (1947). Observations on grain-weevils, Calandra (Col., Cureulionidae). I. General biology and oviposition.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., 117, pp. 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, W.. (1953). Nutrition. In Roeder, K. D.. Ed. Insect physiology, pp. 350–386. London, Chapman & Hall; New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Ullyett, G. C.. (1950). Competition for food and allied phenomena in sheepblowfly populations.—Phil. Trans., (B) 234, pp. 77–174.Google Scholar
Watt, K. E. F.. (1955). Studies on population productivity. 1. Three approaches to the optimum yield problem in populations of Tribolium confusum.— Ecol. Monogr., 25, pp. 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar