Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
Footnotes
Dedicated to Pál Erdős (1913–1996) and András Hajnal (1931–2016)
References
[1]
Abraham, U., Free sets for nowhere-dense set mappings. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 39 (1981), pp. 167–176.Google Scholar
[2]
Abraham, U. and Magidor, M., Cardinal arithmetic, Handbook of Set Theory (M. Foreman and A. Kanamori, editors), II, Springer, 2010, pp. 1149–1227.Google Scholar
[3]
Bagemihl, F., The existence of an everywhere dense independent set. Michigan Math. Journal, vol. 20 (1973), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
[4]
Bagemihl, F., Independent sets and second category. Order, vol. 7 (1990), pp. 65–66.Google Scholar
[5]
Baumgartner, J. E.,
$\mathrm{ADT}\Rightarrow \mathrm{KH}$
, unpublished notes, cca, 1971.Google Scholar
[6]
Baumgartner, J. E., Partition relations for uncountable cardinals. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21 (1975), pp. 296–307.Google Scholar
[7]
Baumgartner, J. E., Almost-disjoint sets, the dense set problem and the partition calculus. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 10 (1976), pp. 401–439.Google Scholar
[8]
Baumgartner, J. E., A new class of order types. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 9 (1976), pp. 187–222.Google Scholar
[9]
Baumgartner, J. E., Generic graph construction. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 234–240.Google Scholar
[10]
Baumgartner, J. E. and Hajnal, A., A proof (involving Martin’s axiom) of a partition relation. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 78, (1973), pp. 193–203.Google Scholar
[11]
Baumgartner, J. E. and Hajnal, A., A remark on partition relations for infinite ordinals with an application to finite combinatorics, Logic and combinatorics (Arcata, Calif., 1985) (S. G. Simpson, editor), Contemporary Mathematics, 65, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 157–167.Google Scholar
[12]
Baumgartner, J. E., Hajnal, A., and Todorčević, S., Extensions of the Erdős-Rado theorem, Finite and Infinite Combinatorics in Sets and Logic (Banff, AB, 1991), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 411, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
[13]
Baumgartner, R., Laver: Iterated perfect set forcing, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 17 (1979), pp. 271–288.Google Scholar
[14]
Benda, M. and Ketonen, J., Regularity of ultrafilters. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 17 (1974), pp. 231–240.Google Scholar
[15]
Ben-David, Sh. and Magidor, M., The weak
$\square$
is really weaker than the full
$\square$
. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 51 (1986), pp. 1029–1033.Google Scholar
[16]
Ben-Neria, O., Garti, S., and Hayut, Y., Weak prediction principles. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 245 (2019), pp. 109–125.Google Scholar
[17]
Bergfalk, J., Michael Hrusák, Saharon Shelah: Ramsey theory for highly connected monochromatic subgraphs. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 163 (2021), pp. 309–322.Google Scholar
[18]
Blass, A., Weak partition relations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 35 (1972), pp. 249–253.Google Scholar
[19]
Chang, C. C., A partition theorem for the complete graph on
${\omega}^{\omega }$
. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, vol. 12 (1972), pp. 396–452.Google Scholar
[20]
Darby, C., Larson, J. A., Multicolored graphs on countable ordinals of finite exponent, Set Theory (Piscataway, NJ, 1999), DIMACS: Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 58, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
[21]
Deiser, O. and Donder, D., Canonical functions, non-regular ultrafilters and Ulam’s problem on
${\unicode{x3c9}}_1$
. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 68 (2003), pp. 713–739.Google Scholar
[22]
Devlin, D. C., Some partition theorems and ultrafilters on
$\boldsymbol{\omega}$
, Ph. D. thesis, Dartmouth College, July 1979.Google Scholar
[23]
Devlin, K. J., Some weak versions of large cardinal axioms. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972–1973), pp. 291–325.Google Scholar
[24]
Devlin, K. J., A note on a problem of Erdős and Hajnal. Discrete Mathematics, vol. 11 (1975), pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
[25]
Devlin, K. J. and Paris, J., More on the free subset problem. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972–1973), pp. 327–336.Google Scholar
[26]
Donder, H.-D., Jensen, R. B., and Koppelberg, B. J., Some applications of the core model, Set Theory and Model Theory, Proc. Bonn, 1979 (R. B. Jensen and A. Prestel, editors), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 872, Springer, Berlin, 1981, pp. 55–97.Google Scholar
[27]
Dudek, A. and Rödl, V., On the Folkman number
$f\left(2,3,4\right)$
. Experimental Mathematics, vol. 17 (2008), pp. 63–67.Google Scholar
[28]
Elekes, G., Colouring infinite subsets of
$\omega$
, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, Infinite and Finite Sets (A. Hajnal, R. Rado, V. T. Sós, editors), vol. 10, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Keszthely, 1973, pp. 393–396.Google Scholar
[29]
Elekes, G., On a partition property of infinite subset of a set. Periodica Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 5 (1974), pp. 215–218.Google Scholar
[30]
Elekes, G., Erd, P., and Hajnal, A., On some partition properties of families of sets. Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica, vol. 13 (1978), pp. 151–155.Google Scholar
[31]
Elekes, G., Hajnal, A., Komjáth, P., Partition theorems for the power set, Sets, Graphs and Numbers (Budapest, 1991) (G. Halász, L. Lovász, D. Miklós, and T. Szőnyi, editors), Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, 60, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 211–217.Google Scholar
[32]
Erdős, P., Some remarks on set theory. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 1 (1950), pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
[33]
Erdős, P., An interpolation problem associated with the continuum hypothesis. Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 11 (1964), pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
[34]
Erdős, P., Problems and results in chromatic graph theory, Proof Techniques in Graph Theory: Proceedings of the Second Ann Arbor Graph Theory Conference, Academic Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 1968, 1969, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar
[35]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., On the structure of set mappings. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 9 (1958), pp. 111–131.Google Scholar
[36]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., On complete topological subgraphs of certain graphs. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis, vol. 7 (1964), pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
[37]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., Some remarks on set theory, IX. Michigan Mathematical Journal, vol. 11 (1964), pp. 107–127.Google Scholar
[38]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., On chromatic number of graphs and set systems. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 17 (1966), pp. 61–99.Google Scholar
[39]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., On the chromatic number of infinite graphs, Graph Theory Symposium, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, 1968 Tihany, 1966, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar
[40]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., Some results and problems for certain polarized partitions. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 21 (1970), pp. 369–392.Google Scholar
[41]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., Unsolved problems in set theory, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 13, Providence, RI, 1971, pp. 17–48.Google Scholar
[42]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., Unsolved and solved problems in set theory, Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 25, Univ. California, Berkeley, Calif., 1971, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1974, pp. 269–287.Google Scholar
[43]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., Some remarks on set theory XI, Collection of articles dedicated to Andrzej Mostowski on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, III. Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 81 (1974), pp. 261–265.Google Scholar
[44]
Erdős, P. and Hajnal, A., Embedding theorems for graphs establishing negative partition relations. Periodica Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 9 (1978), pp. 205–230.Google Scholar
[45]
Erdős, P., Hajnal, A., Máté, A., and Rado, R., Combinatorial Set Theory: Partition Relation for Cardinals, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.Google Scholar
[46]
Erdős, P., Hajnal, A., and Milner, E. C., On the complete subgraphs of graphs defined by systems of sets. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 17 (1966), pp. 159–229.Google Scholar
[47]
Erdős, P., Hajnal, A., and Milner, E. C., On sets of almost disjoint subsets of a set. Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 19 (1968), pp. 209–218.Google Scholar
[48]
Erdős, P., Hajnal, A., and Rado, R., Partition relations for cardinal numbers. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 16 (1965), pp. 93–196.Google Scholar
[49]
Erdős, P., Hajnal, A., and Shelah, S., On some general properties of chromatic numbers, Topics In topology(Proc. Colloq., Keszthely, 1972) (Á. Császár, editor), Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, 8, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 243–255.Google Scholar
[50]
Erdős, P. and Makkai, M., Some remarks on set theory, X. Studia Scientiarum Mathematicarum Hungarica, vol. 1 (1966), pp. 157–159.Google Scholar
[51]
Erdős, P., Milner, E. C., and Rado, R., Intersection theorems for systems of sets, III, Collection of articles dedicated to the memory of Hanna Neumann, IX. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, vol. 18 (1974), pp. 22–40.Google Scholar
[52]
Erdős, P. and Rado, R., A partition calculus in set theory. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 62 (1956), pp. 427–489.Google Scholar
[53]
Fleissner, W. G., Some spaces related to topological inequalities proven by the Erdős–Rado theorem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 71 (1978), pp. 313–320.Google Scholar
[54]
Folkman, J., Graphs with monochromatic complete subgraphs in every edge coloring. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 18 (1970), pp. 19–24.Google Scholar
[55]
Foreman, M., Ideals and generic elementary embeddings, Handbook of Set Theory, (M. Foreman and A. Kanamori, editors), Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2010, pp. 885–1147.Google Scholar
[56]
Foreman, M. and Hajnal, A., A partition relation for successors of large cardinals. Mathematische Annalen, vol. 325 (2003), pp. 583–623.Google Scholar
[57]
Foreman, M. and Laver, R., Some downward transfer properties of
${\aleph}_2$
. Advances in Mathematics, vol. 67 (1988), pp. 230–238.Google Scholar
[58]
Foreman, M., Magidor, M., and Shelah, S., Martin’s maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 127 (1988), pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
[59]
Foreman, M., Magidor, M., and Shelah, S., Martin’s maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. II, Annals of Mathematics, vol. 127 (1988), pp. 521–545.Google Scholar
[60]
Fox, J., Grinshpun, A., and Pach, J., The Erdős–Hajnal conjecture for rainbow triangles. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, (B), vol. 111 (2015), pp. 75–125.Google Scholar
[61]
Fremlin, D. H., Consequences of Martin’s Axiom, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.Google Scholar
[62]
Fremlin, D. H., Real-valued measurable cardinals, Set Theory of the Reals, (H. Judah, editor), volume 6 of Israel Mathematical Conference Proceedings, Emmy Noether Research Institute for Mathematics (ENI), Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Ramat Gan, Israel, 1993, 151–304.Google Scholar
[63]
Galvin, F., On a partition theorem of Baumgartner and Hajnal, colloquia mathematica societatis János Bolyai, Infinite and Finite Sets, vol. 10, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Keszthely, 1973, pp. 711–729.Google Scholar
[64]
Galvin, F. and Larson, J., Pinning countable ordinals. Collection of articles dedicated to Andrzej Mostowski on his sixtieth birthday, VIII. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 82 (1974/75), pp. 357–361.Google Scholar
[65]
Galvin, F. and Prikry, K., Borel sets and Ramsey’s theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 38 (1973), pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
[66]
Galvin, F. and Shelah, S., Some counterexamples in partition calculus. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, (A), vol. 15 (1973), pp. 167–174.Google Scholar
[67]
Garti, S., Unbalanced polarized relations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 149 (2021), pp. 1281–1287.Google Scholar
[68]
Golshani, M., (Weak) diamond can fail at the least inaccessible cardinal. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 256 (2022), pp. 113–129.Google Scholar
[69]
Golshani, M., Generalized Kurepa hypothesis at singular cardinals. Periodica Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 78 (2019), pp. 200–202.Google Scholar
[70]
Gregory, J., Souslin trees and the generalized continuum hypothesis. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 41 (1976), pp. 663–671.Google Scholar
[71]
Gyárfás, A., Komlós, J., and Szemerédi, E., On the distribution of cycle lengths in graphs. Journal of Graph Theory, vol. 8 (1984), pp. 441–462.Google Scholar
[72]
Haddad, L. and Sabbagh, G., Sur une extension des nombres de Ramsey aux ordinaux. Comptes Rendus Math´ematique. Acad´emie des Sciences, vol. 268 (1969), pp. A1165–A1167.Google Scholar
[73]
Hajnal, A., Some results and problems in set theory. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 11 (1960), pp. 277–298.Google Scholar
[74]
Hajnal, A., Ulam matrices for inaccessible cardinals. Bulletin L’Académie Polonaise des Science, vol. 17 (1969), pp. 683–688.Google Scholar
[75]
Hajnal, A., Report on the Miklós Schweitzer memorial contest in 1968. Matematikai Lapok, vol. 20 (1969), pp. 145–171 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
[76]
Hajnal, A., A negative partition relation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 68 (1971), pp. 142–144.Google Scholar
[77]
Hajnal, A., Paul Erdős’ set theory, The mathematics of Paul Erdős, Algorithms Combinatorics II (R. Graham and J. Nešetřil, editors), vol. 14, Springer, Berlin, 1997, pp. 352–393.Google Scholar
[78]
Hajnal, A., Rainbow Ramsey theorems for colorings establishing negative partition relations. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 198 (2008), pp. 255–262.Google Scholar
[79]
Hajnal, A. and Juhász, I., On discrete subspaces of topological spaces. Indagationes Mathematicae, vol. 29 (1967), pp. 343–356.Google Scholar
[80]
Hajnal, A. and Juhász, I., Two consistency results in topology. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 73 (1972), pp. 711.Google Scholar
[81]
Hajnal, A. and Juhász, I., A consistency result concerning hereditarily
$\alpha$
-Lindelöf spaces. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 24 (1973), pp. 307–312.Google Scholar
[82]
Hajnal, A., Juhász, I., and Shelah, S., Splitting strongly almost disjoint families. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 295 (1986), pp. 369–387.Google Scholar
[83]
Hajnal, A., Juhász, I., and Shelah, S., Strongly almost disjoint families, revisited. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 163 (2000), pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
[84]
Hajnal, A. and Máté, A., Set mappings, partitions, and chromatic numbers, Logic Colloquium ’73, Bristol, 1973 (J. Shepherdson and H. E. Rose, editors), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 80, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 347–379.Google Scholar
[85]
Hechler, S. H., On two problems in combinatorial set theory. Bulletin L’Académie Polonaise des Science, Série des Sciences Mathématiques, Astronomiques et Physiques, vol. 20 (1972), 4299–431.Google Scholar
[86]
Inamdar, T. and Rinot, A., Was Ulam right? I. Basic theory and subnormal ideals. Topology and Its Applications, vol. 323 (2023), Paper No. 108287, 53 pp.Google Scholar
[87]
Jech, T., Set Theory: The Third Millenium Edition, Revised and Expanded, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
[88]
Jech, T. and Shelah, S., A note on canonical functions. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 68 (1989), pp. 376–380.Google Scholar
[89]
Jones, A. L., A short proof of a partition relation for triples. Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, vol. 7 (2000), res. paper 24, 9 pp.Google Scholar
[90]
Jones, A. L., A polarized partition relation for weakly compact cardinals using elementary substructures. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 71 (2006), pp. 1342–1352.Google Scholar
[91]
Jones, A. L., On a result of Szemerédi. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 73 (2008), pp. 953–956.Google Scholar
[92]
A. L., Jones, Even more on partitioning triples of countable ordinals. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 146 (2018), pp. 3529–3539.Google Scholar
[93]
Juhász, I. and Shelah, S., How large a hereditarily separable or hereditarily Lindelöf space can be ?Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 53 (1986), pp. 355–364.Google Scholar
[94]
Kanamori, A, On Silver’s and related principles, Logic Colloquium ’80 (D. Van Dalen, D. Lascar, and T. J. Smiley, editors), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 108, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
[95]
Kanamori, A., Partition relations for successors of cardinals. Advances in Mathematics, vol. 59 (1986), pp. 152–169.Google Scholar
[96]
Kanamori, A., Erdős and set theory. Bulletin of the Symbolic Logic, vol. 20 (2014), pp. 449–490.Google Scholar
[97]
Keisler, H. J., A survey of ultraproducts, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Proc. of the 1964 Congress, (Y. Bar-Hillel, editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 112–126.Google Scholar
[98]
Ketonen, J., Nonregular ultrafilters and large cardinals. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 224 (1976), pp. 61–73.Google Scholar
[99]
Koepke, P., The consistency strength of the free–subset property for
${\omega}_{\omega }$
. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 1198–1204.Google Scholar
[100]
Komjáth, P., The colouring number. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 54 (1987), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
[101]
Komjáth, P., Erdős’s work on infinite graphs, Erdős Centennial, (L. Lovász, I. Ruzsa, and V. T. Sós, editors), Springer, Berlin, London, New York, 2013, pp. 325–345.Google Scholar
[102]
Komjáth, P., Notes on some Erdős–Hajnal problems. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 86 (2021), pp. 1116–1123.Google Scholar
[103]
Komjáth, P., A comment on a problem of Erdős, Hajnal, and Milner, manuscript.Google Scholar
[104]
Komjáth, P. and Pach, J., Universal graphs without large bipartite subgraphs. Mathematika, vol. 31 (1984), pp. 282–290.Google Scholar
[105]
Komjáth, P. and Shelah, S., Forcing constructions for uncountably chromatic graphs. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 53 (1988), pp. 696–707.Google Scholar
[106]
Komjáth, P. and Shelah, S., A consistent edge partition theorem for infinite graphs. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 61 (1993), pp. 115–120.Google Scholar
[107]
Komjáth, P. and Shelah, S., Two consistency results on set mappings. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 333–338.Google Scholar
[108]
Komjáth, P. and Shelah, S., Monocolored topological complete graphs in colorings of uncountable complete graphs. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, vol. 163 (2021), pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
[109]
Komjáth, P. and Totik, V., Problems and Theorems in Classical Set Theory, Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2006.Google Scholar
[110]
Kumar, A. and Shelah, S., On a question about families of entire functions. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 239 (2017), pp. 279–288.Google Scholar
[111]
Kunen, K., Inacessibility porperties of cardinals. Ph. D. thesis, Stanford University, 1968.Google Scholar
[112]
Kunen, K., Saturated ideals. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 65–76.Google Scholar
[113]
Lambie-Hanson, C. and Rinot, A., Reflections on the coloring and chromatic numbers. Combinatorica, vol. 39 (2019), pp. 165–214.Google Scholar
[114]
Lange, A. R., Radziszowski, S. P., and Xu, X., Use of MAX-CUT for Ramsey arrowing triangles. Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, vol. 88 (2014), pp. 51–71.Google Scholar
[115]
Larson, J., On some arrow relations, Ph. D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1972.Google Scholar
[116]
Larson, J. A., A short proof of a partition theorem for the ordinal
${\omega}^{\omega }$
. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 6 (1973/74), pp. 129–145.Google Scholar
[117]
Paul Larson, S., Shelah: Bounding by canonical functions, with CH. Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 3 (2003), pp. 193–215.Google Scholar
[118]
Laver, R., An order type decomposition theorem. Annals of Mathematics, (2), vol. 98 (1973), pp. 96–119.Google Scholar
[119]
Laver, R., Partition relations for uncountable cardinals
$\le {2}^{\aleph_0}$
, colloquia mathematica societatis jános bolyai, Infinite and Finite Sets, vol 10, (A. Hajnal, R. Rado, and V. T. Sós, editors), János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Keszthely, 1973, pp. 1029–1042.Google Scholar
[120]
Laver, R., An
$\left({\mathrm{\aleph}}_2,{\mathrm{\aleph}}_2,{\mathrm{\aleph}}_0\right)$
-saturated ideal on
${\unicode{x3c9}}_1$
, Logic Colloquium ’80, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, 108 (D. Van Dalen, D. Lascar, and T. J. Smiley, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 173–180.Google Scholar
[121]
Liu, H. and Montgomery, R., A solution to Erdős and Hajnal’s odd cycle problem. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 36 (2023), pp. 1131–1234.Google Scholar
[122]
Magidor, M., On the existence of nonregular ultrafilters and the cardinality of ultrafilters. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 249 (1979), pp. 97–111.Google Scholar
[123]
Magidor, M. and Shelah, S., When does almost free imply free? (For groups, transversals, etc.). Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol.7 (1994), pp. 769–830.Google Scholar
[124]
Mekler, A. H. and Shelah, S., The consistency strength of “every stationary set reflects”. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 67 (1989), pp. 353–366.Google Scholar
[125]
Miller, E. W., On a property of families of sets. Comptes Rendus Varsovie, vol. 30 (1937), pp. 31–38.Google Scholar
[126]
Mills, C. and Prikry, K., Some recent results about partitions of
${\omega}_1$
, unpublished.Google Scholar
[127]
Milner, E. C., Partition relations for ordinal numbers. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21 (1969), pp. 317–334.Google Scholar
[128]
Milner, E. C. and Prikry, K., A partition theorem for triples. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 97 (1986), pp. 488–494.Google Scholar
[129]
Milner, E. C. and Prikry, K., A partition relation for triples using a model of Todorčević, Directions in infinite graph theory and combinatorics (Cambridge. Discrete Mathematics, vol. 95 (1989), no. 1991, pp.183–191.Google Scholar
[130]
Milner, E. C. and Rado, R., The pigeonhole principle for ordinal numbers. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 15 (1965), pp. 750–768.Google Scholar
[131]
Milner, E. C. and Shelah, S., Some theorems on transversals, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, Infinite and Finite Sets (A. Hajnal, R. Rado, and V. T. Sós, editors), vol. 10, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Keszthely, 1973, pp. 1115–1126.Google Scholar
[132]
Miyamoto, T., Some results in forcing. Ph.D. Thesis, Dartmouth College, 1987.Google Scholar
Nesteril, J. and Rödl, V., A Ramsey graph without triangles exists for any graph without triangles, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolya, Infinite and Finite Sets (A. Hajnal, R. Rado, and V. T. Sós, editors), vol. 10, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Keszthely, 1973, pp. 1127–1132.Google Scholar
[135]
Nesetril, J. and Rödl, V., The Ramsey property for graphs without forbidden complete subgraphs. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, (B), vol. 20 (1976), pp. 243–249.Google Scholar
[136]
Newelski, L., Free sets for some special set mappings. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 58 (1987), pp. 213–224.Google Scholar
[137]
Newelski, L., Pawlikowski, J., and Seredyński, W., Infinite free set for small measure set mappings. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 100 (1987), pp. 335–339.Google Scholar
[138]
Nosal, E., On partition relation for ordinal numbers. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, (2), vol. 8 (1974), pp. 306–310.Google Scholar
[139]
Nosal, E., Partition relations for denumerable ordinals. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, (B), vol. 27 (1979), pp. 190–197.Google Scholar
[140]
Prikry, K., On a problem of Gillman and Keisler. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (1970), pp. 179–187.Google Scholar
[141]
Prikry, K., On a problem of Erdős, Hajnal and Rado. Discrete Mathematics, vol. 2 (1972), pp. 51–59.Google Scholar
[142]
Prikry, K., Kurepa’s hypothesis for singular cardinals, unpublished, 1972.Google Scholar
[143]
Prikry, K., On a set-theoretic partition problem. Duke Mathematical Journal, vol. 39 (1972), pp. 77–83.Google Scholar
[144]
Prikry, K., Kurepa’s hypothesis and a problem of Ulam on families of measures. Monatshefte für Mathematik, vol. 81 (1976), pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
[145]
Raghavan, D. and Todorcevic, S., Suslin trees, the bounding number, and partition relations. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 225 (2018), pp. 771–796.Google Scholar
[146]
Rebholz, J. R., Some consequences of the morass and diamond. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 7 (1974), pp. 361–385.Google Scholar
[147]
Rinot, A., Chain conditions of products. Bulletin of the Symbolic Logic, vol. 20 (2014), pp. 293–314.Google Scholar
[148]
Rödl, V., On the chromatic number of subgraphs of a graph. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 64 (1977), pp. 370–371.Google Scholar
[149]
Schipperus, R., Countable partition ordinals. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 161 (2010), pp. 1195–1215.Google Scholar
[150]
Shelah, S., A combinatorial problem: stability and order for models and theories in infinitary languages. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, vol. 41 (1972), pp. 247–261.Google Scholar
[151]
Shelah, S., Notes on combinatorial set theory. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 14 (1973), pp. 262–277.Google Scholar
[152]
Shelah, S., Notes on partition calculus, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, Infinite and Finite Sets (A. Hajnal, R. Rado, and V. T. Sós, editors), vol. 10, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Keszthely, 1973, pp. 1257–1276.Google Scholar
[153]
Shelah, S., Colouring without triangles and partition relations. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 20 (1975), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
[154]
Shelah, S., A compactness theorem in singular cardinals, free algebras, Whitehead problem, and transversals. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 21 (1975), pp. 319–349.Google Scholar
[155]
Shelah, S., On successors of singular cardinals, Logic Coll (M. Boffa, D. van Dalen, and K. McAloon, editors), vol. 78, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 357–380.Google Scholar
[156]
Shelah, S., Independence of strong partition relation for small cardinals and the free-subset problem. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 505–509.Google Scholar
[157]
Shelah, S.,
${\mathrm{\aleph}}_{\omega }$
may have a strong partition relation. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 38 (1981), pp. 283–288.Google Scholar
[158]
Shelah, S., Proper Forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 940, Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
[159]
Shelah, S., Iterated forcings and normal ideals on
${\unicode{x3c9}}_1$
. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 60 (1987), pp. 345–380.Google Scholar
[160]
Shelah, S., Was Sierpiński right?Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 62 (1988), pp. 355–380.Google Scholar
[161]
Shelah, S., Consistency of positive partition theorems for graphs and models, Set Theory and its Applications (J. Stepr
$\bar{\mathrm{a}}$
ns, editor), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1401, “Set Theory and its Applications”, Proc. Conf. at York University, Toronto, ON, 1987, 1989, pp. 167–193. (sh289)Google Scholar
[162]
Shelah, S., Incompactness for chromatic numbers of graphs, A Tribute to Paul Erdős,(A. Baker, B. Bollobás, and A. Hajnal, editors), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, pp. 361–371.Google Scholar
[163]
Shelah, S., Strong partition relations below the power set: Consistency, was Sierpi ń ski right, II?, Proc Conference on Set Theory and its Applications in honor of A.Hajnal and V.T.Sós (G. Halász, L. Lovász, D. Miklós, T. Szőnyi, editor), vol. 1/91, János Bolyai Mathematical Society, Budapest, 1991, pp. 637–638.Google Scholar
[164]
Shelah, S., On CH+
${2}^{{\mathrm{\aleph}}_1}\to {\left(\unicode{x3b1} \right)}_2^2$
for
$\unicode{x3b1} <{\unicode{x3c9}}_2$
, Logic Coll. '90 (J. Oikkonen and J. Väänänen, editors), Ass. Symb. Logic, Lect Notes in Logic, 2, pp. 281–289.Google Scholar
[165]
Shelah, S., Proper and Improper Forcing, Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
[166]
Shelah, S., Was Sierpi ń ski right? IV. Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 1031–1054.Google Scholar
[167]
Shelah, S., A partition relation using strongly compact cardinals. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 131 (2003), pp. 2585–2592.Google Scholar
[168]
Shelah, S., The Erdős-Rado arrow for singular. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, vol. 52 (2009), pp. 127–131.Google Scholar
[169]
Shelah, S., Universality among graphs omitting a complete bipartite graph. Combinatorica, vol. 32 (2012), pp. 325–362.Google Scholar
[170]
Shelah, S. and Stanley, L., A theorem and some consistency results in partition calculus. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 36 (1987), pp. 119–152.Google Scholar
[171]
Shelah, S. and Stanley, L., More consistency results in partition calculus. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 81 (1993), pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
[172]
Shore, R., Square bracket relations in L. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 84 (1974), pp. 101–106.Google Scholar
[173]
Specker, E., Teilmengen von Mengen mit Relationen. Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici, vol. 31 (1957), pp. 302–314.Google Scholar
[174]
Stanley, L, Velleman, D., and Morgan, C.,
${\omega}_3{\omega}_1\to {\left({\omega}_3{\omega}_1,3\right)}^2$
requires an inaccessible. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 111 (1991), pp. 1105–1118.Google Scholar
Contests in Higher Mathematics, (G. J. Székely, editor), Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, Heidelberg, London, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
[177]
Alan, D., Taylor: Regularity properties of ideals and ultrafilters. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 16 (1979), pp 33–55.Google Scholar
[178]
Alan, D., Taylor: On saturated sets of ordinals and Ulam’s problem. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, vol. 109 (1980), pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
[179]
Thomassen, C., Cycles in graphs of uncountable chromatic number. Combinatorica, vol. 3 (1983), pp. 133–134.Google Scholar
[180]
Todorcevic, S., Trees, subtrees, and order types. Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 20 (1981), pp. 233–268.Google Scholar
[181]
Todorcevic, S., Reals and positive partition relations, Logic Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, VII, Salzburg, 1983 (R. B. Marcus, G. J. W. Dorn, and P. Weingartner, editors), Studies of Logic, 114, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986, pp. 159–169.Google Scholar
[182]
Todorcevic, S., Forcing positive partition relations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 280 (1983), pp. 703–720.Google Scholar
[183]
Todorcevic, S., On a conjecture of R. Rado. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 27 (1983), pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
[184]
Todorcevic, S., Trees and linearly ordered sets, Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology (K. Kunen and J. Vaughan, editors), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984, pp. 235–293.Google Scholar
[185]
Todorcevic, S., Aronszajn trees and partitions. Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 52 (1985), pp. 53–58.Google Scholar
[186]
Todorcevic, S., Partition relations for partially ordered set. Acta Mathematica, vol. 155 (1985), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
[187]
Todorcevic, S., Partitioning pairs of countable ordinals. Acta Mathematica, vol. 159 (1987), pp. 261–294.Google Scholar
[188]
Todorcevic, S., Partittion problems in topology, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 84 (1989), pp. 1–116.Google Scholar
[189]
Yodorcevic, S., Partitioning pairs of countable sets. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (S. Todorcevic, editor), vol. 111 (1991), pp. 841–844.Google Scholar
[190]
Todorcevic, S., Some partitions of three-dimensional combinatorial cubes. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, (A), vol. 68 (1994), pp. 410–437.Google Scholar
[191]
Todorcevic, S., Countable chain condition in partition calculus. Discrete Mathematics, vol. 88 (1998), pp. 105–223.Google Scholar
[192]
Todorcevic, S., Walks om Ordinals and their Characteristics, Progress in Mathematics, 263, Birkhäuser, 2007.Google Scholar
[193]
Todorcevic, S., Introduction to Ramsey Spaces, Annals of Mathematics Studies, Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
[194]
Ulam, St. M., A Collection of Mathematical Problems, New York, Interscience Publications, 1960, reprinted, Problems in Modern Mathematics, Dover, Mineola, NY, 2004.Google Scholar
[195]
Unger, S., Compactness for the chromatic number at
${\aleph}_{\omega_1+1}$
, manuscript.Google Scholar
[196]
Hugh Woodin, W., The Axiom of Determinacy, Forcing Axioms, and the Nonstationary Ideal, Walter de Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar