Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:00:11.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Hilbert-Schmidt norm inequality associated with the Fuglede-Putnam theorem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Takayuki Furuta
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Hirosaki University, Bunkyo–Cho 3, 036 Aomori, Japan.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The familiar Fuglede-Putnam theorem asserts that AX = XB implies A*X = XB* when A and B are normal. We prove that A and B* be hyponormal operators and let C be a hyponormal commuting with A* and also let D* be a hyponormal operator commuting with B respectively, then for every Hilbert-Schmidt operator X, the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of AXD + CXB is greater than or equal to the Hilbert-Schmidt norm of A*XD* + C*XB*. In particular, AXD = CXB implies A*XD* = C*XB*. If we strengthen the hyponormality conditions on A, B*, C and D* to quasinormality, we can relax Hilbert-Schmidt operator of the hypothesis on X to be every operator and still retain the inequality under some suitable hypotheses.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1982

References

[1]Berberian, S.K., “Note on a theorem of Fuglede and Putnam”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 10 (1959), 175182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Berberian, S.K., “Extensions of a theorem of Fuglede and Putnam”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1978), 113114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Furuta, Takayuki, “On relaxation of normality in the Fuglede-Putnam theorem”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1979), 324328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Furuta, Takayuki, Matsumoto, Kyoko and Moriya, Nobuhiro, “A simple condition on hyponormal operators implying subnormality”, Math. Japon. 21 (1976), 399400.Google Scholar
[5]Halmos, Paul R., “Shifts on Hilbert spaces”, J. Reine Angew. Math. 208 (1961), 102112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Halmos, Paul R., A Hilbert space problem book (Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey; Toronto; London; 1967).Google Scholar
[7]Putnam, C.R., “On normal operators in Hilbert space”, Amer. J. Math. 73 (1951), 357362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Rosenblum, M., “On a theorem of Fuglede and Putnam”, J. London Math. Soc. 33 (1958), 376377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Stampfli, Joseph G. & Wadhwa, Bhushan L., “An asymmetric Putnam-Fuglede theorem for dominant operators”, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 25 (1976), 359365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Weiss, Gary, “The Fuglede commutativity theorem modulo the Hilbert-Schmidt class and generating functions for matrix operators. I”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 246 (1978), 193209.Google Scholar
[11]Weiss, Gary, “The Fuglede commutativity theorem modulo the Hilbert-Schmidt class and generating functions for matrix operators. II”, J. Oper. Theory 5 (1981), 316.Google Scholar