Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:54:27.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IDEALS IN DIRECT PRODUCTS OF COMMUTATIVE RINGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

D. D. ANDERSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA (email: dan-anderson@uiowa.edu)
JOHN KINTZINGER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA (email: johnskintzinger@netscape.net)
*
For correspondence; e-mail: dan-anderson@uiowa.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let R and S be commutative rings, not necessarily with identity. We investigate the ideals, prime ideals, radical ideals, primary ideals, and maximal ideals of R×S. Unlike the case where R and S have an identity, an ideal (or primary ideal, or maximal ideal) of R×S need not be a ‘subproduct’ I×J of ideals. We show that for a ring R, for each commutative ring S every ideal (or primary ideal, or maximal ideal) is a subproduct if and only if R is an e-ring (that is, for rR, there exists erR with err=r) (or u-ring (that is, for each proper ideal A of R, )), the Abelian group (R/R2 ,+) has no maximal subgroups).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Australian Mathematical Society

References

[1]Anderson, D. D., ‘Commutative rings’, in: Multiplicative Ideal Theory in Commutative Algebra, a Tribute to Robert Gilmer (Springer, New York, 2006), pp. 120.Google Scholar
[2]Anderson, D. D. and Camillo, V., ‘Subgroups of direct products of groups, ideals and subrings of direct products of rings, and Goursat’s lemma’, Preprint.Google Scholar
[3]Gilmer, R., ‘Eleven non-equivalent conditions on a commutative ring’, Nagoya J. Math. 26 (1966), 174183.Google Scholar