Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:01:25.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON SKEW-SUPERCOMMUTING MAPS IN SUPERALGEBRAS

Part of: General nonassociative rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

YU WANG
YU WANG*
Affiliation:
College of Mathematics, Jilin Normal University, Siping, 136000, People’s Republic of China (email: ywang2004@mail.china.com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let A be a semiprime superalgebra over a commutative ring F with and f:A→A a skew-supercommuting map on A. We show that f=0. This gives a version of Brešar’s theorem for superalgebras.

Keywords

prime superalgebrasemiprime superalgebraskew-supercommuting map

MSC classification

Secondary: 17A70: Superalgebras
Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 397 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Australian Mathematical Society

References

[1]Beidar, K. I., Brešar, M. and Chebotar, M. A., ‘Jordan superhomomorphism’, Comm. Algebra 31 (2003), 633–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Beidar, K. I., Chen, T.-S., Fong, Y. and Ke, W.-F., ‘On graded polynomial identities with an antiautomorphism’, J. Algebra 256 (2002), 542–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Beidar, K. I., Martindale 3rd, W. S. and Mikhalev, A. V., Rings with Generalized Identities (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996).Google Scholar
[4]Brešar, M., ‘On skew-commuting mappings of rings’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 47 (1993), 291–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Brešar, M., ‘On generalized biderivations and related maps’, J. Algebra 172 (1995), 764–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Brešar, M., Martindale, W. S. and Miers, C. R., ‘Centralizing maps in prime rings with involution’, J. Algebra 161 (1993), 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Chen, T.-S., ‘Supercentralizing superderivations on prime sueralgebras’, Comm. Algebra 33 (2005), 4457–4466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Chung, L. O. and Luh, J., ‘On semicommuting automorphisms of rings’, Canad. Math. Bull. 21 (1987), 13–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fošner, M., ‘Jordan superderivation’, Comm. Algebra 31 (2003), 4533–4543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fošner, M., ‘On the extended centroid of prime associative superalgebras with applications to superderivations’, Comm. Algebra 32 (2004), 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Fošner, M., ‘Jordan ε-homomorphisms and Jordan ε-derivations’, Taiwanese J. Math. 9 (2005), 595–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Hirano, Y, Kaya, A. and Tominaga, H., ‘On a theorem of Mayne’, J. Okayama Univ. 25 (1983), 125–132.Google Scholar
[13]Kaya, A., ‘A theorem on semi-centralizing derivations of prime rings’, J. Okayama Univ. 27 (1985), 11–12.Google Scholar
[14]Kaya, A. and Koc, C., ‘Semicentralizing automorphisms of prime rings’, Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hunger. 38 (1981), 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Kelarev, A. V., Ring Constructions and Applications (World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 2002).Google Scholar
[16]Montaner, F., ‘On the Lie structure of associative superalgebras’, Comm. Algebra 26 (1998), 2337–2349.Google Scholar
[17]Wang, Y., ‘Supercentralizing automorphisms on prime superalgebras’, Taiwanese J. Math. to appear.Google Scholar