1. Introduction
In 2006, Adamchuk [Reference Adamchuk1] proposed the following congruence involving central binomial coefficients: for any prime $p\equiv 1\pmod {3}$ ,
This conjecture was confirmed by the author [Reference Mao6]. Many researchers studied congruences for sums of binomial coefficients (see, for instance, [Reference Mao and Cao7, Reference Pan and Sun10, Reference Sun14, Reference Sun and Tauraso17]). Pan and Sun [Reference Pan and Sun10] used a combinatorial identity to deduce that if p is a prime, then
where $(\frac {\cdot }{\cdot })$ is the Jacobi symbol. They also showed that for any odd prime p,
In 2018, Apagodu [Reference Apagodu2] conjectured that for any odd prime p,
Mao and Cao [Reference Mao and Cao7] confirmed this conjecture and also showed that for any odd prime p,
The Bernoulli numbers $\{B_n\}$ and the Bernoulli polynomials $\{B_n(x)\}$ are given by
Mattarei and Tauraso [Reference Mattarei and Tauraso8] deduced that for any prime $p>3$ ,
Sun [Reference Sun13] obtained many congruences involving central binomial coefficients and proposed many conjectures. Our first goal is to prove a conjecture of Sun ([Reference Sun13, Conjecture 5.2] or [Reference Sun16, Conjecture 6]).
Theorem 1.1. Let p be an odd prime. Then
Sun [Reference Sun14] proved that for any odd prime p,
where the Euler numbers $\{E_n\}$ are given by
Our second goal is to generalise (1.1) as follows.
Theorem 1.2. For any odd prime p and p-adic integers $a, b$ ,
Remark 1.3. If we set $a=0, b=1$ , we obtain (1.1), and with $a=b=1$ , we obtain
Finally, we prove the following result.
Theorem 1.4. Let p be an odd prime. Then
Remark 1.5. Combining (1.1), (1.2) and Theorem 1.4,
Combining Theorem 1.2 with $a=2, b=1$ and Theorem 1.4,
Consequently, we can evaluate $\sum _{k=0}^{p-1}(ak^2+bk+c){\binom {2k}k}/{2^k}$ modulo $p^3$ .
We prove Theorem 1.1 in Section 2. Sections 3 and 4 are devoted to proving Theorems 1.2 and 1.4. Our proofs make use of some congruences involving harmonic numbers and combinatorial identities which can be found and proved by the package Sigma [Reference Schneider11] via the software Mathematica and some known congruences.
2. Proof of Theorem 1.1
For $n,m\in \{1,2,3,\ldots \}$ , define the harmonic numbers of order m by
When $m=1$ , these numbers are the classical harmonic numbers.
To prove Theorem 1.1, we need some lemmas and identities. For each positive integer n,
Remark 2.1. Equation (2.1) follows from [Reference Gould3, (3.99)]; (2.2) can be proved by induction on n; (2.3) and (2.4) follow from [Reference Gould3, (1.45)] and an identity of Hernández [Reference Hernández4] (or [Reference Sun15, (3.4)]), respectively.
Lemma 2.2 [Reference Sun12, Theorems 5.1 and 5.2].
Let $p>3$ be a prime. Then
Lemma 2.3 [Reference Sun15, Lemma 4.2].
Let $p=2n+1$ be an odd prime and $k\in \{0,\ldots ,n\}$ . Then
Lemma 2.4. Let $p=2n+1$ be an odd prime and $k\in \{0,\ldots ,n\}$ . Then
Proof. It is easy to check that
By Lemma 2.3, modulo $p^3$ ,
From this, we immediately obtain the desired result.
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
The cases $p=3, 5$ can be checked directly. We will assume $p>5$ from now on. By (2.1),
By Sigma [Reference Schneider11], we find the following identity which can be proved by induction on n:
This, with Lemma 2.4, yields
Substituting $n=(p-1)/2$ into (2.2)–(2.4),
In view of [Reference Mao5, Lemma 3.2] and Lemma 2.2,
This, with Lemma 2.2, yields the desired result.
3. Proof of Theorem 1.2
Lemma 3.1. For any prime $p>3$ ,
where $q_p(2)=(2^{p-1}-1)/p$ stands for the Fermat quotient.
Proof. By Sigma, we find the following identity which can be proved by induction on n:
Setting $n=(p-1)/2$ ,
The well-known Morley’s congruence [Reference Morley9] gives
This, with $2^{p-1}=1+pq_p(2)$ , yields
This proves Lemma 3.1.
Lemma 3.2. Let $p>3$ be a prime. Then
Proof. By Sigma, we find the following identity which can be proved by induction on n,
Substituting $n=(p-1)/2$ into the above identity and by (3.1),
Tauraso [Reference Tauraso18] and Sun [Reference Sun14, (1.5)] respectively proved
These, with Lemma 2.2, yield
Similarly, by Sigma, we find the following identity which can be proved by induction on n:
Setting $n=(p-1)/2$ , and invoking (3.1), (3.2), (3.3) and Lemma 2.2,
This completes the proof of Lemma 3.2.
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
We can check the case $p=3$ directly. From now on, we assume that $p>3$ . By Sigma, we find the following identity which can be proved by induction on n:
Substituting $n=p$ into this identity and using (2.1),
This, with Lemma 2.4, yields, modulo $p^3$ ,
It is easy to check that
Setting $n=(p-1)/2$ ,
This, with Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, yields, modulo $p^3$ ,
Simplifying this congruence using (3.1) and $2^{p-1}=1+pq_p(2)$ gives Theorem 1.2.
4. Proof of Theorem 1.4
Lemma 4.1. Let $p>3$ be a prime. Then
Proof. By Sigma, we can find and prove the identity
and it is easy to see that
Substituting $n=(p-1)/2$ into these identities and using Lemmas 2.4 and 2.2,
This proves Lemma 4.1.
Lemma 4.2. For any prime $p>3$ ,
Proof. By Sigma, we can find and prove the following identity:
Substituting $n=(p-1)/2$ into this identity and using Lemma 2.4,
where
In view of (3.1) and Lemma 2.2,
By Sigma, we can find and prove the identity
Setting $n=(p-1)/2$ in this identity and using (3.1), (3.2), (3.3) and Lemma 2.2,
Hence,
This completes the proof of Lemma 4.2.
Proof of Theorem 1.4.
It is easy to check by (2.1) that
By Sigma, we find the following identity which can be proved by induction on n:
Substituting $n=p$ into this identity and using Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2,
which gives the result in Theorem 1.4.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments.