Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:40:43.653Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychiatry: myth or science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Klaus Ebmeier
Klaus Ebmeier*
Affiliation:
Royal Cornhill Hospital, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 8 , Issue 9 , September 1984 , pp. 179
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1984

References

1 Walmsley, T. (1984) Teaching psychiatry: Scientific myth. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 8, 109–10.Google Scholar
2 King, M. B. (1984) Changes in American psychiatry: Impressions of a UK trainee. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 8, 102–4.Google Scholar
3 Jaspers, K. (1963) General Psychopathology. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
4 Shepherd, M. (1982) Karl Jaspers: General psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 310–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Storr, A. (1983) A psychotherapist looks at depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 431–35.Google Scholar
6 Hempel, C. G. & Oppenheim, P. (1948) Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–75.Google Scholar
7 Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. E. (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.