Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:00:27.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychoanalysis: natural or human science?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

K. P. Ebmeier
K. P. Ebmeier*
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Mental Health, Aberdeen
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , Volume 10 , Issue 9 , September 1986 , pp. 249 - 250
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1986

References

1. Mathers, C. B. B. (1986) Psychoanalysis: Science or nonscience? Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 10, 103–104.Google Scholar
2. Jaspers, K. (1963) General Psychopathology, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
3. Bhaskar, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
4. Will, D. (1983) Transcendental realism and the scientificity of psychoanalysis. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 56, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.