Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:18:10.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controversy in the tonal analysis of Tibetan1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

R. K. Sprigg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tone made its appearance in descriptions of Tibetan pronunciation as early as 1881, when Jäschke introduced the term into an account of the prosodic features of the spoken Tibetan dialects: ‘A system of tones has been introduced. … I am told by European students of reputation, who have made the Tonic languages of eastern Asia their special department, that only the first principles of what are known as the high and low Tones, have made their way into Tibetan. … Here, as in the languages of Farther India, generally, which possess an alphabetic system of writing, the Tone is determined by the initial consonant of the word.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , October 1993 , pp. 470 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, C. A. 1905/1939. Grammar of colloquial Tibetan. Alipore: Bengal Government Press.Google Scholar
Chang, K., and Shefts, B. 1964. A manual of spoken Tibetan (Lhasa dialect). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Chang, K., and Shefts, B. 1978. Spoken Tibetan texts, Nankang, Taipei.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. C, and Nornang, N. 1970. Modern spoken Tibetan: Lhasa dialect. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Sir B., and Richardson, H. E. 1943. Tibetan sentences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Sir. B., and Richardson, H. E. 1949. Tibetan language records, etc. Kalimpong: Tibet Mirror Press.Google Scholar
Hari, A. M. 1979. ‘An investigation of the tones of Lhasa Tibetan’, Language Data. (Asian Pacific Series, No. 13.) Huntington Beach: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hu, T. 1982. ‘Recherches sur les tons du Tibétain (dialecte de Lhasa)’, Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientate, XI, 1, ll–46.Google Scholar
Jäschke, H. A. 1865. Tibetan grammar. Kyelang [lithograph].Google Scholar
Jäschke, H. A. 1881/1934. A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Kitamura, H. 1974. Sendai Tibetto-go no hatuon. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of the Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1971. Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, M. 1977. ‘Tibeto-Burman tonogenetics’, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area, 3/2.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, M. 1984. Review of Hari, A. M., ‘An investigation of the tones of Lhasa Tibetan’, LTBA, 8/1, 91–9.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, M., and Michailovsky, B. 1989. ‘Lost syllables and tonal contour in Dzongkha’, in (ed.) Bradley, D., Henderson, E. J. A., and Mazaudon, M.Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: to honour R. K. Sprigg. (Pacific Linguistics, Series C—104.) Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU, 115–36.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, B. 1989. ‘Notes on Dzongkha orthography’, in (ed.) Bradley, D., Henderson, E. J. A., and M., MazaudonProsodic analysis and Asian linguistics: to honour R. K. Sprigg. (Pacific Linguistics, Series C—104.) Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, ANU, 297–301.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1948. Tone languages. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1954. ‘Verbal phrases in Lhasa Tibetan, I–II’, BSOAS, xvi, 1–2, 134–56, 322–50.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1955. ‘The tonal system of Tibetan (Lhasa dialect) and the nominal phrase’, BSOAS, xvII, 1, 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1968. ‘The phonology of the grammatical constituents of verbal-phrase words in spoken Tibetan (Lhasa dialect)’. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1979. ‘The Golok dialect and written Tibetan past-tense verb forms’ BSOAS, XLII, 1, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1981. ‘The Chang-Shefts tonal analysis, and the pitch variation of the Lhasa Tibetan tones’, LTBA, 6/1, 49–60.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. (1991). ‘The Spelling-style pronunciation of Written Tibetan, and the hazards of using citation forms in thphonological analysis of Spoken Tibetan’, LTBA, 14/2, 93–132.Google Scholar
Wylie, T. 1959. ‘A standard system of Tibetan transcription’, Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 22, 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, D. and Jaw, Y. (Y. R. Chao). 1930. Love songs of the Sixth Dalai Lama, Tshangs-dbyangs = rgya-mtsho, Peiping: Academia Sinica. (Series A, no. 5.)Google Scholar