Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:29:05.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The converb -las in Old Tibetan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2010

Nathan W. Hill
Nathan W. Hill*
Affiliation:
School of Oriental and African Studies
*
nh36@soas.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contrast to its description in available grammars and manuals, the converb -las in Old Tibetan is used primarily to mark off the following clause as surprising given the background of the preceding clause. The converb -las enters into two distinct syntactic constructions: after a reduplicated verb it indicates the interruption of a continuous event; and in a three-clause pattern with the converb -kyis, -las introduces a surprise or contrast in the second clause, but -kyis in the third clause returns the sentiment to that of the first clause. Although the examples which demonstrate the use of -las are drawn from Old Tibetan texts, this use continues in later texts.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , June 2010 , pp. 245 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Contracts = Takeuchi 1995

Ḥdzaṅs-blun = Schmidt 1843

OTA = Old Tibetan Annals (PT 1288 and ITJ 750, Imaeda et al. 2007: 230–44)

OTC = Old Tibetan Chronicle (PT 1287, Imaeda et al. 2007: 200–29)

Rāma = de Jong 1989

Rkoṅ-po = Li and Coblin 1987: 193–226

Treaty of 821–822 = Li and Coblin 1987: 34–137

Źol = Li and Coblin 1987: 138–85

Źwa-baḥi = Li and Coblin 1987: 261–99

Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. New York: State University of New York Press; reprinted, Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. (London Oriental and African Language Library 3.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesang, Gyurme (ed. and trans. Stoddard, Heather and Tournadre, Nicolas). 1992. Le clair miroir. Enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Arvillard: Éditions Prajñā.Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael. 1996. Lehrbuch der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. (Indica et Tibetica 10.) Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.Google Scholar
Yoshiro, Imaeda et al. 2007. Tibetan Documents from Dunhuang, Kept at the Bibliothèque nationale de France and the British Library. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
de Jong, Jan Willem. 1959. Mi la ras pa'i rnam thar: texte tibétain de la vie de Milarépa. ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, J. W. 1989. The story of Rāma in Tibet: Text and translation of the Tun-huang manuscripts. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Fang-kuei, Li and Coblin, Weldon South. 1987. A Study of the Old Tibetan Inscriptions. (Special Publications 91.) Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Isaac Jakob. 1843. Ḥdzaṅs-blun oder der Weise und der Thor. St. Petersburg: W. Gräff's Erben.Google Scholar
Schwieger, Peter. 2006. Handbuch zur Grammatik der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Haale: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Tsuguhito. 1995. Old Tibetan Contracts from Central Asia. Tokyo: Daizo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Géza., Uray 1954. “Duplication, germination and triplication in Tibetan”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 4/1–3, 177–256.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina. 2001. “The development of temporal coding in Tibetan: some suggestions for a functional internal reconstruction. Part II: The original semantics of the ‘past stem’ of controlled action verbs and the re-organisation of the Proto-Tibetan verb system”, Zentralasiatische Studien 31, 169–216.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina. 2004. Relative Tense and Aspectual Values in Tibetan languages. A Comparative Study. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 150.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. New York: State University of New York Press; reprinted, Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. (London Oriental and African Language Library 3.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kesang, Gyurme (ed. and trans. Stoddard, Heather and Tournadre, Nicolas). 1992. Le clair miroir. Enseignement de la grammaire tibétaine. Arvillard: Éditions Prajñā.Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael. 1996. Lehrbuch der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. (Indica et Tibetica 10.) Swisttal-Odendorf: Indica et Tibetica Verlag.Google Scholar
Yoshiro, Imaeda et al. 2007. Tibetan Documents from Dunhuang, Kept at the Bibliothèque nationale de France and the British Library. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
de Jong, Jan Willem. 1959. Mi la ras pa'i rnam thar: texte tibétain de la vie de Milarépa. ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, J. W. 1989. The story of Rāma in Tibet: Text and translation of the Tun-huang manuscripts. Stuttgart: F. Steiner.Google Scholar
Fang-kuei, Li and Coblin, Weldon South. 1987. A Study of the Old Tibetan Inscriptions. (Special Publications 91.) Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Isaac Jakob. 1843. Ḥdzaṅs-blun oder der Weise und der Thor. St. Petersburg: W. Gräff's Erben.Google Scholar
Schwieger, Peter. 2006. Handbuch zur Grammatik der klassischen tibetischen Schriftsprache. Haale: International Institute for Tibetan and Buddhist Studies GmbH.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Tsuguhito. 1995. Old Tibetan Contracts from Central Asia. Tokyo: Daizo Shuppan.Google Scholar
Géza., Uray 1954. “Duplication, germination and triplication in Tibetan”, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 4/1–3, 177–256.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina. 2001. “The development of temporal coding in Tibetan: some suggestions for a functional internal reconstruction. Part II: The original semantics of the ‘past stem’ of controlled action verbs and the re-organisation of the Proto-Tibetan verb system”, Zentralasiatische Studien 31, 169–216.Google Scholar
Zeisler, Bettina. 2004. Relative Tense and Aspectual Values in Tibetan languages. A Comparative Study. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 150.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar