Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:17:56.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dual power in Susa: Chronicle of a transitional period from Ur III via Šimaški to the Sukkalmaḫs1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2012

Katrien De Graef
Katrien De Graef*
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Belgium
*
katrien.degraef@ugent.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article brings together evidence from both documentary texts and royal inscriptions from Susa in order to develop a chronological and historical perspective on the transitional period between the loss of control of the Ur III empire and the institutionalization of the Sukkalmaḫ regime. A study of the archaeological and archival context of the administrative texts resulted in a new chronology for the beginning of the Sukkalmaḫat, the basic argument for which is the early dating of the rule of Atta-ḫušu. Newly discovered inscriptions and new interpretations of existing inscriptions serve not only to adjust this chronology, but also to pave the way for an innovative and coherent socio-economic history of the early Sukkalmaḫat.

Keywords

SusaChronologySukkalmaḫŠimaškiSecond millennium bce
Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , October 2012 , pp. 525 - 546
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This article presents research results of the “Interuniversity Pole of Attraction Programme VI/34, Belgian State, Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs”. The text published here is an expanded version of a paper I read at the 53rdRencontre Assyriologique Internationale “Language in the Ancient Near East/City administration in the Ancient Near East”, held in Moscow/St-Petersburg, Russia (23–28 July 2007). All dates referred to in this article follow the short chronology as stated in Gasche et al. 1998. I would like to thank D. Akbarzadeh, Director and Curator of the cuneiform department, and S. Piran of the National Iranian Museum for their most hospitable welcome during my stays in Tehran to study the tablets from Susa, as well as for their permission to publish the photograph of BK 712 (MDP 55, 20). I also thank P. Steinkeller for the stimulating discussions we had during my stay at Harvard and J.A. Armstrong for improving the English text. My cordial thanks go as always to M. Tanret who read the manuscript and offered comments and suggestions.

References

BIN 9 = Crawford, V.E. 1954. Sumerian Economic Texts from the First Dynasty of Isin. New Haven.Google Scholar
Carter, E. and Stolper, M.W.. 1984. Elam: Surveys of Political History and Archaeology. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Charpin, D. 1990. “Une alliance contre l'Elam et le rituel du lipit napištim”, in Vallat, F. (ed.), Mélanges Jean Perrot. Paris, 109–18.Google Scholar
Charpin, D. 2004. “Histoire politique de Proche-Orient amorrite (2002–1595)”, in D. Charpin, D.O. Edzard and Stol, M., Mesopotamien. Die altbabylonische Zeit (= OBO 160/4). Fribourg and Göttingen, 25–480.Google Scholar
De Graef, K. 2007. “Les textes de V récent du Chantier B à Suse (fin Sukkalmaḫat – c. 1575–1530 av. notre ère)”, Iranica Antiqua 42: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graef, K. 2008. “Annus Simaškensis. L'usage des noms d'année pendant la période simaškéenne (c. 1930–1880 av. notre ère) à Suse”, Iranica Antiqua 43: 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Graef, K.K. (Forthcoming). A Socio-Economic History of the Early Sukkalmaḫat.Google Scholar
De Meyer, L. 1962. L'accadien des contrats de Suse. (Iranica Antiqua Supplementum 1.) Leiden.Google Scholar
De Meyer, L. 1973. “Epart Sukkalmaḫ?”, in Beek, M.A. and de Liagre Böhl, F.M.T. (eds), Symbolae Biblicae et Mesopotamicae Francisco Mario Theodoro de Liagre Böhl Dedicatae. (Studia Francisci Scholten Memoriae Dicata 4.) Leiden, 293–4.Google Scholar
Durand, J.-M. 1986. “Fragments rejoints pour une histoire élamite”, in L. De Meyer, H. Gasche and Vallat, F. (eds), Fragmenta Historiae Elamicae: Mélanges offerts à M.-J. Steve. Paris, 111–28.Google Scholar
EW = Hinz, W. and Koch, H.. 1987. Elamisches Wörterbuch. (Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran. Ergänzungsband 17.) Berlin.Google Scholar
GAG = Von Soden, W. 1995. Grundriß der akkadischen Gramatik (3. ergänzte Auflage) (= AnOr 33). Rome.Google Scholar
Gasche, H., Armstrong, J.A., Cole, S.W. and Gurzadyan, V.G.. 1998. Dating the Fall of Babylon. A Reappraisal of Second-Millennium Chronology. (Mesopotamian History and Environment. Mémoires 4.) Ghent and Chicago: Ghent University-Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Ghirshman, R. 1968. “Suse au tournant du IIe millénaire avant notre ère. Travaux de la délégation archéologique en Iran. Hiver 1966–1967. Rapport préliminaire”, Arts Asiatiques 17: 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glassner, J.-J. (Forthcoming). “Les premiers Sukkalmaḫ et les derniers rois de Simaški” in De Graef, K. and Tavernier, J. (eds), Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Proceedings of the International Congress held at Ghent University, December 14–17, 2009. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Grillot, F. and Glassner, J.-J.. 1993. “Chronologie susienne”, Nouvelles Brèves et Utilitaires Assyriologiques 18.Google Scholar
Heimpel, W. 2009. Workers and Construction Work at Garšana (= CUSAS 5). Bethesda.Google Scholar
König, F.W. 1965. Die elamische Königsinschriften (= AfO Beiheft 16). Graz.Google Scholar
Læssoe, J. 1965. “IM 62100: a letter from Shemshara”, in Güterbock, H.G. and Jacobsen, Th. (eds), Studies in Honor of Benno Landsberger (= AS 16). Chicago, 189–96.Google Scholar
Mahboubian, H. 2004. Elam. Art and Civilization of Ancient Iran 3000–2000 bc. Salisbury, Wiltshire: BAS Printers.Google Scholar
Malbran-Labat, F. 1995. Les inscriptions royals de Suse: Briques de l’époque paléo-élamite à l'Empire néo-élamite. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 1 = de Morgan, J., Jéquier, G. and Lampre, G.. 1900. Recherches archéologiques – première série. Fouilles à Suse en 1897–1898 et 1898–1899. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 4 = Scheil, V. 1902. Textes élamites-sémitiques, deuxième série. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 9 = Scheil, V. 1907. Textes élamites-anzanites, troisième série. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 10 = Scheil, V. 1908. Textes élamites-sémitiques, quatrième série. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 18 = Dossin, G. 1927. Autres textes sumériens et accadiens. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 22 = Scheil, V. 1930. Actes juridiques susiens. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 23 = Scheil, V. 1932. Actes juridiques susiens (suite: n° 166 à n° 327). Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 24 = Scheil, V. 1933. Actes juridiques susiens (suite: n° 328 à n° 395). Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 25 = Allotte de la Fuye, F.M., Belaiew, N.T., de Mecquenem, R. and Unvala, J.-M.. 1934. Archéologie, métrologie et numismatique susienne. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
MDP 28 = Scheil, V. 1939. Mélanges épigraphiques. Paris.Google Scholar
MDP 43 = Amiet, P. 1972. Glyptique susienne des origines à l’époque des Perses achéménides. Cachets, sceaux-cylindres et empreintes antiques découverts à Suse de 1913 à 1967. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
MDP 47 = Gasche, H. 1973. La potterie élamite du deuxième millénaire a.C. Leiden and Paris: Brill/Geuthner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MDP 54 = De Graef, K. 2005. Les archives d'Igibuni. Les documents Ur III du Chantier B à Suse. Ghent: Ghent University.Google Scholar
MDP 55 = De Graef, K. 2006. De la dynastie Simaški au Sukkalmaḫat. Les documents fin PE IIB – début PE III du Chantier B à Suse. Ghent: Ghent University.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 2008. “Observations on ‘Elamites’ and ‘Elam’ in Ur III times”, in Michalowski, P. (ed.), On the Third Dynasty of Ur: Studies in Honor of Marcel Sigrist (= JCS Suppl. Series 1), 109–24.Google Scholar
Mofidi-Nasrabadi, B. 2009. Aspekte der Herrschaft und der Herrscherdarstellungen in Elam im 2. Jt. v. Chr. (= AOAT 356). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
RIME 2/3 = Frayne, D.R. 1997. Ur III Period (2112–2004) (= The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods 3/2). Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salonen, E. 1962. Glossar zu den altbabylonischen Urkunden aus Susa (= StOr 36). Helsinki.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. 1926. “Raptim 1. Cylindre Pala iššan”, Revue d'Assyriologie 23, 36.Google Scholar
Scheil, V. 1931. “Dynasties Élamites d'Awan et de Simaš”, Revue d'Assyriologie 28, 1–8.Google Scholar
Seidl, U. 1990. “Altelamische Siegel” in Vallat, F. (ed), Contribution à l'histoire de l'Iran: Mélanges offerts à Jean Perrot. Paris, 129–35.Google Scholar
Sollberger, E. 1968. “A tankard for Atta-ḫušu”, Journal of Cuneiform Studies 22, 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkeller, P. 2007. “New light on Šimaški and its rulers”, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 97, 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinkeller, P. (forthcoming a). “On the dynasty of Šimaški: twenty-five years after”. Festschrift Stolper.Google Scholar
Steinkeller, P. (forthcoming). “Puzur-Inšušibak at Susa: a pivotal episode of early history reconsidered”, in De Graef, K. and Tavernier, J. (eds), Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Proceedings of the International Congress held at Ghent University, December 14–17, 2009. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Steve, M.-J., Gasche, H. and De Meyer, L.. 1980. “La Susiane au deuxième millénaire: à propos d'une interprétation des fouilles de Suse”, Iranica Antiqua 15, 49–154.Google Scholar
Steve, M.-J., Vallat, F. and Gasche, H.. 2002. “Suse”, Supplément au dictionnaire de la Bible 73, 350–512.Google Scholar
Stolper, M.W. 1982. “On the dynasty of Šimaški and the early Sukkalmaḫs”, Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 72, 42–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanret, M. and De Graef, K.. 2010. “The exercise tablets from Chantier B in Susa revisited”, Iranica Antiqua 45, 225–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallat, F. 1989a. “Le scribe Ibni-Adad et les premiers Sukkalmaḫ”, Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 34.Google Scholar
Vallat, F. 1990. “Reflexions sur l’époque des Sukkalmaḫ”, in Vallat, F. (ed.), Contribution à l'histoire de l'Iran: Mélanges offerts à Jean Perrot. Paris, 119–27.Google Scholar
Vallat, F. 1996a. “L’Élam à l’époque paléo-babylonienne et ses relations avec la Mésopotamie”, in Durand, J.-M. (ed.), Mari, Ebla et les Hourrites, dix ans de travaux (première partie). (Amurru I.) Paris, 297–319.Google Scholar
Vallat, F. 2007. “Temti-Agun I. Un nouveau Sukkalmaḫ”, Akkadica 128, 73–84.Google Scholar
Vallat, F. 2009. “Du règne de Kindadu à celui d'Atta-ḫušu”, Nouvelles Assyriologiques Brèves et Utilitaires 16.Google Scholar