No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
page 348 note 1 Cf. Vol. III, pp. 814'20.
page 349 note 1 Cf. e.g. Varahamihira's Brhatmmhitā, ch. lxviii sq.
page 349 note 2 It has recently been contended by some scholars–amongst others, I think, by Dr. Coomaraswamy–that the image of the Buddha is of purely Indian, not of Gandhāra, origin. Unfortunately, historical evidence goes quite the opposite way.
page 350 note 1 Cf. Journal As., 1921; Tome xvii, p. 216 sq.Google Scholar
page 350 note 2 Cf. Journal As., 1925; Tome ccvii, p. 336 sq.Google Scholar
page 350 note 3 Jātahamālā xxxi; the title there is Sutasoma° not ŚrutaSomajātaka.