Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:24:55.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pharyngeal articulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

M. M. Ghali
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper attempts to identify some unexplored types of articulation in the production of some speech sounds. The main interest here lies in the way some English and Arabic sounds are produced: the vowel /a/ in English, and Arabic consonants /ε/ and /ħ/.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , October 1983 , pp. 432 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

al-Ānī, Salmān H. 1970. Arabic phonology: an acoustical and physiological investigation. (Janua Linguarum. Series Practica, 61.) The Hague, Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avicenna, . Makhārij al-Ḥurūf. Ed. Khānlarī, Parvīz Nātil. 1333/1916. Tehran: [University of Tehran].Google Scholar
Leonard, Bloomfield. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. London: Allen and Unwin, 1934.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1963. Comparing the phonetic features of English, French, German and Spanish: an interim report. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. (ed.). 1973. Phonology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1973. An introduction to descriptive linguistics: phonemic fieldtoork. (Revised edition.) New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Gray, Giles W., and Wise, Claude M. 1946. The bases of speech. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Gray, Louis H. 1934. Introduction to Semitic comparative linguistics. New York: Columbia University Press. (Repr. Amsterdam: PhUo Press, 1971.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffner, R. -M. S. 1952. General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Hajime, Hirose and Ushijima, Tatsujiro. 1978. ‘Laryngeal control for voicing distinction in Japanese consonant production’, Phonetica, xxxv/1, 1–10.Google Scholar
Jinni, Ibn. 1374/1954. Sirr Ṣinā'at il-i'rāb, ed. Muṣṭafā, al-Saqqā and others. Cairo: Al-Ḥalabī.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1957. ‘Mufaxxama—the emphatic phonemes in Arabic’, in E., Pulgram (ed.), Studies presented to Joshua Whatmough. The Hague, Paris: Mouton. (Reprinted in E. Fudge (ed.), 1973, 159–71.)Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., and Halle, M. 1973. ‘The distinctive features’, in Fudge, E. C. (ed.), 1973, 151–8.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R., Fant, C. G. M., and Halle, M. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis: the distinctive features and their correlates. (Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Acoustics Laboratory. Technical report no. 13. Second printing with additions and corrections.) Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Daniel, Jones. 1956. An outline of English phonetics. (Eighth edition.) Cambridge: W. Heffer.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Harold M. 1971. Anatomy and physiology of speech. (Second edition.) New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1964. A phonetic study of West African Languages: an auditory instrumental survey. (West African Language Monographs, 1.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1975. A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Mona, Ldndau. 1979. ‘The feature expanded’, Journal of Phonetics, 7/2, 163–6.Google Scholar
Bertil, Malmberg. 1963. Phonetics. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar
Obrecht, Dean H. 1968. Effects of the second formant on the perception of velarization consonants in Arabic. (Janua Linguarum. Series Practica, 39.) The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenneth, Pike. 1944. Phonetics: a critical analysis of phonetic theory and a technic for the practical description of sounds. (Language and Literature, 21.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Polomé, E. 1965. ‘The laryngeal theory so far: a critical bibliographical survey’, in W., Winter (ed.), Evidence for laryngeals. (Janua Linguaram. Series Maior, 11.) The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Potter, Ralph K., Kopp, George A., and Kopp, Harriet Green. 1974. Visible speech. New York: Dover Press.Google Scholar
Sībawayhi, . al-Kitīb. Facsimile ed. 1318/1900. 2 vols. Cairo: National Printing Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1977. ‘Physics of laryngeal behavior and larynx modes’, Phonetica, 34/4, 264–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, Michael. 1974. ‘Linguistics and its adjacent sciences’, in T., Sebeok (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics, Vol. 12/10, 2349–85. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sidney, Wood. 1979. ‘A radiographic analysis of constriction locations for vowels’, Journal of Phonetics, 7/2, 25–43.Google Scholar