No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
The Iranian field seems sometimes to have more than its fair share of fakes. In material form they range from silver bowls with novel ‘Old Persian’ inscriptions to highly original ‘early modern Persian’ manuscripts. On the literary side we have a series of dictionaries which should rate high among works of fiction, containing as they do, beisde the glossators' mistakes of centuries, the vocabularies of at least two fictitious languages.
page 170 note 1 See Schaeder, H. H., ‘Über einigc altpersische Inschriften’, Sb. PAW, Phil.-Hist. Klasse, 1935, Nr. 19, 489–94Google Scholar; Minovi, M.,‘Kāpūsnāma’-yi Frye, Tehran, 1956Google Scholar.
page 170 note 2 viz. the scribes’ mnemonic pronunciations of the rarer ideograms in Pahlavi, and ‘the fancy words of the Desātīr’; v. Henning, W. B., apud Boyce, M., BSOAS, xv, 2, 1953, 283–6Google Scholar.
page 170 note 3 In Ossetic, v. Henning, , BSOAS, xxi, 2, 1958, 315–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 170 note 4 Verb. sap.
page 170 note 5 ‘Une apologie kurde du sunnisme’, Rocznih Orjentalistyczny, VIII, 1932, p. 125, n. 18Google Scholar.
page 170 note 6 ‘La religion des Kurdes’, Proche-Orient Chrétien, xi, 2, 1961, 110Google Scholar.
page 170 note 7 Yāsimī, Rašīd-i, Kurd va paivastayī-yi nižādī va tārīxī-yi ū, Tehran, n.d. (probably c. 1940),119.Google Scholar
page 171 note 1 Kitāb-i tārīx-i Mardūx, vol. I, Tehran, n.d. (probably c. 1950), 50.
page 172 note 1 Fidā, Muḥammad, Mēžū-y Kurd ü Kurdistān, Baghdad, 1958Google Scholar.
page 172 note 2 ‘‘K voprosu o kurdskoj literature’, Issledovanija po istorii lcul'tury narodov vostoka (sbornik v Čest' Akademika I. A. Orbeli), Moscow-Leningrad, 1960, 434Google Scholar.
page 173 note 1 Kâtip èelebi: hayati ve eserleri haklanda incelemeler (TTK, vn. Seri, No. 33), Ankara,1957, 56.Google Scholar