Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-r2nwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-31T05:07:09.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The root finals of Bantawa Rai verbs, and the congruence of phonology with grammar and lexis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

R. K. Sprigg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘The meaning of texts is dealt with by a dispersal of analysis at mutually congruent series of levels, beginning with contexts of situation and proceeding through collocation, syntax (including colligation) to phonology and phonetics⃜ Stylistics with some notice of phonaesthetic features, lexicography and the place and use of translation are to be included to complete the spectrum’ (Firth, 1957: 30).

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of SOAS , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , February 1989 , pp. 91 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, L. E. 1932. The phonetics of French. London.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1964. ‘Phonation types: the classification of some laryngeal components of speech production’, in Abercrombie, D. et al. , (ed.). In honour of Daniel Jones, 26–37. London.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1936. See: Stewart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1957. ‘A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955’, in W. S., Allen (ed.). Studies in Linguistic Analysis (Special volume of the Philological Society). Oxford.Google Scholar
Hale, A. 1982. Research on Tibeto-Burman languages (Trends in linguistics, State-of-the-Art Reports 14). Mouton.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. 1942/1957. ‘Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis’, Language, 18: 169–80 [republished in Joos, 1957, as 109–15].Google Scholar
James, A. LI. 1929. Historical introduction to French phonetics. London.Google Scholar
Joos, M. 1957. Readings in linguistics, i. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Linguistic Survey of India. 1909/1967. iii, 1, G. A., Grierson (ed.). Calcutta, [reprinted: Motilal Banarsidass].Google Scholar
Michailovsky, B. 1975. ‘On some Tibeto-Burman sound changes’, in C., Cogen et al. , (ed.) Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 322–32. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, B. 1979/1985. ‘Tibeto-Burman dental suffixes: evidence from Limbu’ [paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan languages and linguistics, Paris[ [published, with minor changes, as 363–75 in G., Thurgood, J. A., Matisoff, and D., Bradley (ed.) Linguistics of the Sino-Tibetan area: the state of the art (Pacific Linguistics, series C, no. 87, special number: papers presented to Paul, K. Benedict for his 71st birthday). Canberra].Google Scholar
Passy, P. 1907/1914. The sounds of the French language. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1943. Phonetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Shafer, R. 1957. Bibliography of Sino-Tibetan languages. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Shafer, R. 1963. Bibliography of Sino-Tibetan languages, 2, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1966. ‘Phonological formulae for the verb in Limbu, as a contribution to Tibeto- Burman comparison’, in C. E., Bazell et al. (ed.). In memory of J. R. Firth, 431–53. Longman's.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1978. ‘Phonation types: a re-appraisal’, Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 8, 1–2, 2–17.Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. 1984/1985. ‘The Limbu s-final and t-final verb roots, after Michailovsky 1979 and Weidert 1982’, Nepalese Linguistics, 3, 11–55 [also, but with I.P.A. symbols, in Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area, 8, 2, as 1–35].Google Scholar
Sprigg, R. K. to appear.‘Types of r (prosodic) piece in a Firthian phonology of English, and their vowel and consonant systems’, York papers in linguistics,Google Scholar
Stewart, J. A. 1936. An introduction to colloquial Burmese. Rangoon. [‘ The phonetic script employed accords with the system devised by Mr. J. R. Firth’].Google Scholar
Swadesh, M. 1934. ‘The phonemic principle’, Language, 10, 117–29 [reprinted in Joos, 1957, as 32–7].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuker, Sir F. 1957, Gorkha. London.Google Scholar
Weidert, A. K. 1982. ‘Verb class morphology of Limbu’ [paper prepared for the 3rd Annual Conference of the Linguistic Society of Nepal, Kathmandu, 1982].Google Scholar