No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Toda vowels in non-initial syllables
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2009
Extract
It has been observed (Emeneau (1957), 63–4) that Toda and Kota show loss of many vowels in the non-initial syllables of reconstructed proto-Dravidian (PDr.) or proto-South Dravidian (PSDr.) forms. An attempt was made to state a rule as follows: ‘every non-initial syllable of PSDr. (or perhaps PDr.) that has a short vowel loses its vocalic peak in Toda; vowels of all qualities are lost except that *i > y'. Exceptions were noted, and an attempt was made, with some misgivings, to save the rule by several manoeuvres. One of these was to insist that the rule applied only to pre-Toda short vowels and to note that some at least of the short vowels that appear in non-initial syllables in Toda words ‘originally’ were long vowels, i.e. some Toda short vowels in non-initial syllables were derived from pre-Toda by a rule that stated that PSDr. (or PDr.) long vowels in non-initial syllables became short vowels in Toda and remained as such. This latter rule can be demonstrated to hold for a greater number of examples than the few that were mentioned in the 1957 paper. It should be noted at once that the rule applies only to Toda, and that when cognates are to be found, Kota retains the length of these vowels.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 1979 , pp. 225 - 234
- Copyright
- Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 1979
Footnotes
1
This paper is offered to my colleague and friend in admiration for his scholarship and in gratitude for much. I most thank Dr. George L. Hart III for instruction in matters of Tamil grammar.
References
DBIA = Emeneau, M. B., and Burrow, T. 1962. Dravidian borrowings from Indo-Aryan. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, xxvi.) Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
DED = Burrow, T., and Emeneau, M. B. 1961. A Dravidian etymological dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
DEDS = Burrow, T., and Emeneau, M. B. 1968. A Dravidian etymological dictionary: supplement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
‘DEN’ = Burrow, T., and Emeneau, M. B. 1972. ‘Dravidian etymological notes’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, xcii, 397–418, 475–91.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1944. Kota texts, part one. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, II, 1.) Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1957. ‘Toda, a Dravidian language’, Transactions of the Philological Society 1957, 15–66.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1974a. Ritual structure and language structure of the Todas. (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, LXIV, 6.) Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Emeneau, M. B. 1974b. ‘The Indian linguistic area revisited’, International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics, III, 92–134.Google Scholar
Peter,
Prince of Greece and Denmark. 1963. A study of polyandry. The Hague: Mouton and Co.Google Scholar
Sakthivel, S. 1976. Phonology of Toda with vocabulary. (Annamalai Department of Linguistics, 41.) Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, S. V. 1971. Dravidian nouns (a comparative study). (Annamalai Department of Linguistics, 25.) Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P. S. 1971. Dravidian verb morphology (a comparative study). (Annamalai Department of Linguistics, 24.) Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P. S. 1976. ‘The Toda developments of Proto-Dravidian *a, *a:, *1 and *1’, Dravidian Linguistics, v (ed. Agesthialingom, S. and Subrahmanyam, P. S.), 87–120. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P. S. 1977. ‘Proto-Dravidian *r in Toda’, Indian Linguistics, XXXVIII, 1–5.Google Scholar