Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:44:07.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Together but separate: How Muslim scholars conceived of religious plurality in South Asia in the seventeenth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2011

Mouez Khalfoui
Mouez Khalfoui*
Affiliation:
Free University of Berlin
*
moezkhalfoui@googlemail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Al-Fatāwā al-Hindiyya Al-ʿĀlamjīriyya is a compendium of Islamic Ḥanafi law. It was written in South Asia during the second half of the seventeenth century with the goal of filling the gap between local social reality and Islamic legal theory. In order to establish an authoritative ruling, the authors compared the views of Central Asian scholars on Ḥanafi law, like those from Balakh and Bukhārā, with the opinions held by the Iraqi scholars, in particular Abū Ḥanīfa and his two disciples. This paper argues that the South Asian scholars shared more similarities with their Iraqi colleagues than with the Central Asian branch of the Ḥanafi school of law, although the latter were closer to them chronologically than the Iraqi scholars. Furthermore, the South Asian scholars' “permissive” point of view regarding non-Muslim residents may be ascribed to the pressure of the social reality in South Asia, which pushed them to search for a compromise between the population's ruling Muslim minority and the non-Muslim majority.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 87 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ʿAbū Yaʿqūb, Aḥmad (al-Yaʿqūbī). Rep. 1891. Kitāb al-Buldān. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
ʿAbū Yūsuf, Yaʿqūb. Rep. 1979. Kitāb al-Kharāj. Beirut: Dār al-maʿrifa.Google Scholar
Assayag, Jackie. 2004. “Can Hindus and Muslims coexist?”, in Ahmad, Imtiaz and Reifeld, Helmut (eds), Lived Islam in South Asia. Delhi: Social Science Press, 40–59.Google Scholar
Bulliet, Richard W. 1979. Conversion to Islam in the Medieval Period: An Essay in Quantitative History. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattal, Antoine. 1958. Le statut légal des non musulmans en pays d'Islam. Beirut: Imprimerie catholique.Google Scholar
Guenther, Alan M. 2003. “Hanafi Fiqh in Mughal India: The Fatawa-i-Alamgiriyya”, in M Eaton, Richard. (ed.), India's Islamic Traditions 711–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 209–29.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. 1999. “Entre révélation et tyrannie: le droit des non-musulmans d'après les juristes musulmans”, in Johansen, Baber (ed.), Contingency in a Sacred Law. Leiden: Brill, 219–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalfaoui, Mouez. 2008. L´islam indien: pluralité ou pluralisme. Le cas Al-Fatāwā al- Hindiyya al-ʿAlamjīriyya. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Al-Marghinānī, Burhān-Dīn. n.d. Al-Hidāya sharḥ Bidāyat al-mubtadī. Cairo: al-Maktaba at-Tawfīqiyya.Google Scholar
Michaels, Axel. 1998. Hinduismus: Geschichte und Gegenwart. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Mustʿad Khan, Saqi. Rep. 1947. Maasir-i-Alamgiri, a History of the Emperor Aurangzib-Alamgir, tr. Sarkar, Jadu-Nath. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal.Google Scholar
Niẓām, shaykh, Rep. 1991. Al-Fatāwā al-Hindiyya al-ʿAlamjīriyya. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.Google Scholar
Nizami, Khaliq Ahmad. Rep. 2002. Religion and Politics in India during the Thirteenth Century. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paret, Rudi. 1970. “Toleranz und Intoleranz im Islam”, Saeculum 21, 344–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qāḍikhān, Fakhr-Din. Rep. 1991. Fatāwā. Reprinted on the marge of Al-Fatāwā al- Hindiyya al-ʿAlamjīriyya. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Jagdish. 1984. The Mogol Policy. Delhi: Idarah-I-Adabiyat-I-Delhi.Google Scholar
Al-Shaybānī, Muḥammad ibn al-Ḥasan. Rep. 1991. Le Grand Livre de la Conduite de l'État [Kitāb ls-Siyar al-Kabīr], tr. Hamidullah, Muhammad. Ankara: Dianet Vakfi.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. Rep. 2006. “Der Raum und die räumlichen Ordnungen der Gesellschaft”, in Eigmüller, Monika and Vobruba, Georg (eds), Grenz-Soziologie, Die politische Strukturierung des Raumes. Wiesbaden: SV-Verlag, 15–23.Google Scholar
Troupeau, G. 1986. “Qiyās”. Encyclopedia of Islam. (New Edition.) Leiden: Brill, V, 238–42.Google Scholar