Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:19:50.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tone Rules in Kalam Kohistani (Garwi, Bashkarik)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Joan L. G. Baart
Joan L. G. Baart
Affiliation:
Summer Institute of Linguistics, Islamabad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Kalam Kohistani is a Dardic language spoken in the upper parts of the Swat and Panjkora valleys (Swat Kohistan and Dir Kohistan), in Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province. In the literature, the language is known by different names, the most familiar of which are Garwi and Bashkarik. The name Garwi occurs in the Linguistic Survey of India (LSI, 8/2: 507ff.), while Bashkarik is used by Morgenstierne (1940), which is the standard reference on the language to date.

Type
Articles
Information
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 88 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baart, Joan L. G.. 1995. ‘The tones of Kalam Kohistani (Garwi, Bashkarik)’. Paper presented at the third International Hindukush Cultural Conference, Chitral, 26–30 August 1995. [To be published in Conference Proceedings].Google Scholar
Baart, Joan L. G.. 1997. The sounds and tones of Kalam Kohistani: with wordlist and texts. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Barth, Fredrik. 1956. Indus and Swat Kohistan: an ethnographic survey. Oslo.Google Scholar
Biddulph, John. [1880]/1971. Tribes of the Hindoo Koosh. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.) 1978. Tone: a linguistic survey. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
KIDP, . 1988. Background information on Kalam tehsil. Internal report of the Kalam Integrated Development Project, Kalam, Swat, NWFP.Google Scholar
LSI = Linguistic survey of India, 8/2, 1919. Grierson, George A. (ed.). Calcutta.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1991. The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1932. Report on a linguistic mission to north-western India. Oslo: Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1940. ‘Notes on Bashkarik’, Acta Orientalia, 18: 206–257.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1942. ‘Notes on Dameli: a Kafir-Dardic language of Chitral’, Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap 12: 115–198.Google Scholar
Rensch, Calvin R. 1992. ‘Patterns of language use among the Kohistanis of the Swat Valley’, in Leary, Clare F. O. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Survey of Northern Pakistan, Vol. 1: Languages of Kohistan, 3–62. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Snider, Keith. 1986. ‘Apocope, tone and the glottal stop in Chumburung’, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 8, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, Richard F. 1973. ‘Notes on the Nuristani and Dardic languages’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 93/3: 297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar