Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T06:42:43.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Captured by Business? Romanian Market Governance and the New Economic Elite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patricia T. Young
Patricia T. Young*
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Brunswick and Piscataway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the 1990s, there was a lot of concern in studies of post-communism about communist-era managers stalling institutional reforms due to their ability to gain long-term advantages through institutional capture. By influencing market governance rules (corporate governance, bankruptcy, competition laws), managers could protect and amplify initial economic gains from liberalization, entrenching economic inequality. Yet in the 2000s, even the laggards of transition have implemented significant market governance reforms and have enjoyed rapid economic growth. Moreover, business perceptions of state capture (from BEEPS) have dropped substantially. The paper examines this surprising turnaround with evidence from the Romanian case. I argue that contrary to expectations, business interests have failed to capture market governance institutions. In spite of benefiting from shady privatization deals and other advantages based on political connections, the new Romanian entrepreneurs were not threatened by sophisticated market governance laws. This argument based on the preferences of business actors is a necessary addition to explanations of institutional reforms that rely on international conditionality or on economic crisis.

Keywords

market governanceinstitutional reformstate capturecorruptioneconomic eliteRomania
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , April 2010 , pp. 1 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2010 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aslund, Anders. 2002. Building Capitalism: The Transformation of the Former Soviet Bloc. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Badulescu, Alina and Badulescu, Daniel. 2008. “Corporate Governance in Romania. The State of the Art and Recent Developments.” Annals of the University of Oradea http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1159798 (accessed September 20, 2008)Google Scholar
Barnes, Andrew. 2007. “Extricating the State: The Move to Competitive Capture in Post-Communist Bulgaria.” Europe-Asia Studies 59 (1): 71–95.Google Scholar
Broadman, Harry G. and Recanatini, Francesca. 2000. “Seeds of Corruption: Do Market Institutions Matter?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2368. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Bozoki, Andras. 2003. “Theoretical interpretations of elite change in East Central Europe.” Comparative Sociology 2 (1): 215–47.Google Scholar
Carey, Henry F. 2004. “Conclusion: Ambiguous Democratization?” In Romania since 1989: Politics, Economics, and Society, edited by Carey, Henry F. Lanham: Lexington Books, 553–618.Google Scholar
Cernat, Lucian. 2004. “The Politics of Banking in Romania: Soft Loans, Looting and Cardboard Billionaires.” Government and Opposition: 451–75.Google Scholar
Cigna, Gian Piero and Enriques, Luca. 2005. “Annex 1.2: Corporate Governance” in Transition Report 2005. London: EBRD, 23–31.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (EC). 2005. Romania: 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report. COM (2005) 534 final, Brussels.Google Scholar
Doltu, Claudiu. 2002. “Banking Reform in Romania.” In Banking Reforms in South-East Europe, edited by Sevic, Zeljko. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EBRD. 2008a. Transition Report 2008: Growth in Transition. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
EBRD. 2008b. “Concession Laws Assessment 2007/8 Cover Analysis Report” http://www.ebrd.com/country/sector/law/concess/assess/conces08.pdf (accessed September 19, 2008)Google Scholar
EBRD. 2008c. Commercial Laws of Romania: An Assessment by the EBRD. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
EBRD. 2007a. Transition Report 2007: People in Transition. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
EBRD. 2007b. “Securities Markets Legal Indicator Survey” http://ebrd.com/country/sector/law/corpgov/smlis/chart1.pdf (accessed August 16, 2009).Google Scholar
EBRD. 2005. Transition Report 2005: Business in Transition. London: European Bank of Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
EBRD. 2004. “Insolvency Assessments: Legal Indicator Survey 2004” http://www.ebrd.com/country/sector/law/insolve/insolass/index.htm (accessed September 21, 2008)Google Scholar
EBRD. 1999. Transition Report 1999: 10 Years of Transition. London: European Bank of Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Hanson, Stephen. 2003. “Time, Space and Institutional Change in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule, edited by Ekiert, Grzegorz and Hanson, Stephen. New York: Cambridge University Press, 15–48 Google Scholar
Epstein, Rachel. 2006. “Cultivating Consensus and Creating Conflict: International Institutions and the (De)Politicization of Economic Policy in Postcommunist Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (8): 1019–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2009. Nations in Transit 2009. www.freedomhouse.org (accessed Nov 14, 2009)Google Scholar
Gallagher, Tom. 2005. Theft of a Nation: Romania Since Communism. London: Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
Ganev, Venelin. 2007. Preying on the State: The Transformation of Bulgaria After 1989. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, John and Hetman, Yaroslav. 2008. “Market Democracy Unleashed? Business Elites and the Crisis of Competitive Authoritarianism in Ukraine.” Business and Politics 10 (2): 1–33.Google Scholar
Gould, John and Sickner, Carl. 2008. “Making Market Democracies? The Contingent Loyalties of Post-Privatization Elites in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Serbia.” Review of International Political Economy 15 (5): 740–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2006. The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 1013–1031.Google Scholar
Grødeland, Åse Berit. 2007. “‘Red Mobs’, ‘Yuppies’, ‘Lamb Heads’ and Others: Contacts, Informal Networks and Politics in the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Bulgaria and Romania.” Europe-Asia Studies 59 (2): 217–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan. 2000. “Interests, Institutions, and Policy Reform.” In Economic Policy Reform: The Second Stage, edited by Krueger, Anne. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 21–57.Google Scholar
Hankiss, Elemer. 1990. East European Alternatives. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hanley, Eric. 2000. “Cadre Capitalism in Poland and Hungary: Capital Accumulation Among Communist-era Elites.” East European Politics and Societies 14 (1): 143–78.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions.” World Politics 50 (2): 203–234.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel, Jones, Geraint and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2444. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economies.” Finance and Development 38 (3), http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/09/hellman.htm (accessed May 18, 2007).Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Gamal and Galt, Vaughan. 2002. “Bye-bye central planning, hello market hiccups: institutional transition in Romania.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26: 105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2007. “Romania - 2007 Article IV Consultation, Concluding Statement of the Mission.” http://www.imf.org/external/np/ms/2007/031307a.htm (accessed April 14, 2007).Google Scholar
Jacoby, Wade. 2005. The Enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the Institutional Menu in Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Juliet. 2000. A Fistful of Rubles: The Rise and Fall of the Russian Banking System. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, Alena. 2006. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Movit, Charles. 2006. “Challenges to Banking Sector Stability in Selected Member States.” In The Central and Eastern European Countries and the European Union, edited by Artis, Michael, Banerjee, Anindya and Marcellino, Massimiliamo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 274–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaumer, Michel. 2005. “Assessing legal systems: a catalyst for reform.” Beyond Transition 16 (2): 21–2.Google Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pasti, Vladimir. 2006. The New Romanian Capitalism (Noul Capitalism Romanesc.) Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
Pasti, Vladimir. 1997. The Challenges of Transition: Romania in Transition. Boulder and New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pop, Liliana. 2006. Democratizing Capitalism? The Political Economy of post-communist transformations in Romania, 1989–2001. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 2007. “The Scope and Limitations of Political Conditionality: Romania's Accession to the European Union.” Comparative European Politics 5: 347–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey. 2005. Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Postcommunist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAR (Romanian Academic Society). 2002. “Bad Politics Prompts Bad Justice.” Early Warning Report Romania 5: 6–18.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei and Treisman, Daniel. 2000. Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stan, Lavinia. 2004. “Notes on Corrupt Post-Communist Privatization.” Sfera Politicii 112: 39–45.Google Scholar
Staniszkis, Jadwiga. 1991. The Dynamics of Breakthrough: The Polish Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stark, David and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2000. “Whither Reform? Ten Years of Transition.” In Annual World Bank Conference on Economic Development, edited by Pleskovic, B. and Stiglitz, J. Washington: World Bank, 27–56 Google Scholar
Svejnar, Jan. 2002. “Transition Economies: Performance and Challenges.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szalai, Erzsbet. 1994. “The Power Structure in Hungary after the Political Transition.” In The New Great Transformation? Change and Continuity in East Central Europe, edited by Bryant, G.A. and Mokrzycky, Edmund. London: Routlegde.Google Scholar
Toma, Doru. 2007. “The decoupling of economics and politics” (Decuplarea economicului de politic.) http://www.info-legal.ro (accessed July 29, 2008)Google Scholar
TI (Transparency International). 2008. “Romania begins harvesting the anti-corruption measures crop.” http://www.transparency.org/news_room/latest_news/press_releases_nc/2008/2008_09_23_romania_cpi (accessed January 11, 2009)Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldner, Andrew. 2003. “Elite Opportunity in Transitional Economies.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank, World. 2006. Doing Business 2007: How to Reform. Washington: World Bank and International Finance Corporation.Google Scholar
Bank, World. 2005. “Capital Markets and Non-Bank Financial Institutions in Romania: Assessment of Key Issues and Recommendations for Development.” World Bank Working Paper 45.Google Scholar
Bank, World. 2002. “The BEEPS II Interactive Dataset: Enterprise Survey in Transition 2002.” http://info.worldbank.org/governance/beeps2002/ (accessed August 12, 2007)Google Scholar
Bank, World. 1999. “BEEPS Interactive Dataset.” http://info.worldbank.org/governance/beeps/ (accessed August 12, 2007)Google Scholar
Young, Patricia T. 2008. “Democratic and Market Governance in Romania: Between Domestic Politics and EU Accession.” Review of European and Russian Affairs 4 (1): 74–110.Google Scholar