Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:04:49.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate Power Beyond the Political Arena: The case of the ‘Big Three’ and CAFE Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2017

Terry Hathaway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article outlines the ways in which corporations are powerful and can realize their interests in society and policy, through a case study of Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the U.S. It diverges from the main bodies of literature on corporate power—which focus more on corporate actions in the formal policy process (such as lobbying or campaign contributions) or on the structural dependence of the state on capital—by showing how corporate-led material and ideational societal change was key to the realization of corporate interests in formal policy, as corporate-led societal change reshaped the baseline from which policy was made. Additionally, through the case study, this article offers a new conceptual language for corporate power, and demonstrates how to approach and test power analysis with a sensitivity to both the temporal element of power and an understanding that power can operate beyond the formal political arena. This original case study, then, is significant in that it should encourage political economy scholars to adopt a broader societal focus, to work with a more comprehensive understanding of power, and to utilize longer study timeframes when seeking to assess corporate power.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2017 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelal, R. 2015. “The Multinational Firm and Geopolitics: Europe, Russian Energy, and Power.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 553–76.Google Scholar
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. 2001. Press Release: Nas Study Confirms Need for Cafe Reform [Online]. Advocacy and Public Policymaking Project. Available: http://lobby.la.psu.edu/_107th/126_CAFE_Standards_2/Organizational_Statements/AAM/AAM_043001.htm [Accessed 22 November 2011].Google Scholar
Amin, A., and Thrift, N.J. 2004. The Blackwell Cultural Economy Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
An, F., and Sauer, A. 2004. Comparison of Passenger Vehicle Fuel Economy and Ghg Emission Standards around the World. Arlington, Virginia: PEW Centre.Google Scholar
Anderson, S.T., Parry, I.W.H., Sallee, J.M., and Fischer, C. 2011. “Automobile Fuel Economy Standards: Impacts, Efficiency, and Alternatives.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 5 (1): 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auto Alliance. 2015. Contribution of the Automotive Industry to the Economies of All Fifty States and the United States [Online]. Available: http://www.autoalliance.org/files/dmfile/2015-Auto-Industry-Jobs-Report.pdf [Accessed 20 July 2015].Google Scholar
Ballesteros, M.F., Dischinger, P.C., and Langenberg, P. 2004. “Pedestrian Injuries and Vehicle Type in Maryland, 1995–1999.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 36 (1): 73–81.Google Scholar
Bamberger, R. 2002. “Automobile and Light Truck Fuel Economy: The CAFE Standards.” Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Baron, D.P. 1998. “Integrated Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Client and Interest Group Politics.” [Working Paper No. 1480] Stanford University.Google Scholar
Beder, S. 1998. “Ecological Double Agents.” Australian Science, 19 (1): 19–22.Google Scholar
Bell, S. 2012. “The Power of Ideas: The Ideational Shaping of the Structural Power of Business.” International Studies Quarterly, 56: 661–73.Google Scholar
Bernhagen, P. 2007. The Political Power of Business: Structure and Information in Public Policy-Making. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernhagen, P., and Bräuninger, T. 2005. “Structural Power and Public Policy: A Signaling Model of Business Lobbying in Democratic Capitalism.” Political Studies 53 (1): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, F. 1977. “The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist theory of the State.” Socialist Revolution, 33: 6–28.Google Scholar
Block, F., and Piven, F.F. 2010. “Déjà Vu, All over Again: A Comment on Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson, ‘Winner-Take-All Politics’.” Politics & Society 38 (2): 205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. 2001. “Neoliberal Newspeak: Notes on the New Planetary Vulgate.” Radical Philosophy 105 (1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Bradsher, K. 2004. High and Mighty: The Dangerous Rise of the Suv. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Bragman, A. 2007. “U.S. Congress Settles on Fuel Economy Increase: 35 Mpg by 2020.” Global Insight, 3 December 2007.Google Scholar
Bureau of Transportation Statistics. 2015. Productions, Production Shares, and Production-Weighted Fuel Economies of New Domestic and Imported Automobiles [Online]. Available: http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_20.html [Accessed 2 February 2015].Google Scholar
Burnett, S. 2007. A Blood for Oil Trade Congress Can Get Behind [Online]. Available: http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/18278/blood-oil-trade-congress-can-get-behind/sterling-burnett [Accessed 7 November 2011].Google Scholar
Byrne, R. 2003. Life in the Slow Lane [Online]. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists. Available: http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_vehicles/vehicle_impacts/cars_pickups_and_suvs/life-in-the-slow-lane.html [Accessed 8 November 2011].Google Scholar
Carlson, A. 2009. “Iterative Federalism and Climate Change.” Northwestern University Law Review 103 (3): 1097–162.Google Scholar
Carnahan, R. 2005. “Improving the Nation's Energy Security: Can Cars and Trucks Be Made More Fuel Efficient?” Hearing by the House Committee on Science. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Casper, B.M. 2000. Lost in Washington: Finding the Way Back to Democracy in America. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
News, CBS. 2009. Gm: A Timeline [Online]. Available: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/general-motors-timeline/ [Accessed 20 July 2015].Google Scholar
CEI. 1994. The Human Cost of Regulation: Reframing the Debate on Risk Management [Online]. University of California. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/dwt22d00 [Accessed 9 November 2011].Google Scholar
CEI. 1998. Competitive Enterprise Institute Donation Form [Online]. Available: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/jot72e00;jsessionid=7E2A7861D7A82ABD31915E61BE83AD96.tobacco03 [Accessed 16 November 2011].Google Scholar
Center for Biological Diversity. 2009. Lawsuit Challenges Obama Fuel Economy Standards [Online]. Available: http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2009/cafe-standards-04-02-2009.html [Accessed 13 February 2012].Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. 2011. John Dingell 2004 Summary [Online]. Available: http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00001783&cycle=2004 [Accessed 24 November 2011].Google Scholar
Clegg, S.R. 1989. Frameworks of Power, London, Sage.Google Scholar
Coalition for Vehicle Choice. 2001. Issue Brief [Online]. Available: http://www.vehiclechoice.org/cafe/brief/cafe.html. Accessed through http://lobby.la.psu.edu/023_CAFE_Standards_1/frameset_cafe.html [Accessed 15 February 2012].Google Scholar
Congress 2007. “Energy Independence and Security Act.” United States Statutes at Large, 121 STAT. 1492 P.L. 110–40.Google Scholar
Congressional Record 2007. S15005. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cooney, S., and Yacobucci, B. 2008. “Federal Loans to the Auto Industry under the Energy Independence and Security Act.” Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Crandall, R., and Graham, J. 1989. “The Effect of Fuel Economy Standards on Automobile Safety.” Journal of Law and Economics 32: 97–118.Google Scholar
Crotty, J. 2000. “Structural Contradictions of the Global Neoliberal Regime.” Review of Radical Political Economics 32 (3): 361–68.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P.D. 2011. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P.D., and Reinke, R. 2014. “Structural Power and Bank Bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Politics & Society 42 (4): 427–54.Google Scholar
Culpepper, P.D. 2015 “Structural Power and Political Science in the Post-crisis Era.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 391–410.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. 1961. Who Governs? Power and Democracy in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, T. 2001. “Corporate Average Fuel Economy (Cafe) Reform.” Hearing by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Doniger, D. 2007. “The Implications of the Supreme Court's Decision Regarding Epa's Authorities with Respect to Greenhouse Gases under the Clean Air Act.” Hearing by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Dunn, J.A. 2006. “Automobile Fuel Efficiency Policy: Beyond the Cafe Controversy. In Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of U.S. Environmental Policy, edited by Repetto, R.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Durbin, D. 2007. “Creating Long-Term Energy Alternatives for the Nation Act of 2007.” Congressional Record. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Evans, L. 1984. “Driver Fatalities Versus Car Mass Using a New Exposure Approach.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 16 (1): 19–36.Google Scholar
Evans, L. 2002. Does CAFE Kill? [Online]. Available: http://cei.org/outreach-regulatory-comments-and-testimony/does-cafe-kill-oral-remarks-dr-leonard-evans [Accessed 8 November 2011].Google Scholar
Fairfield, T. 2015. “Structural Power in Comparative Political Economy: Perspectives from Policy Formulation in Latin America.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 411–41.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D. 2005. “Commanding Heights? The Strength and Fragility of Business Power in Global Politics.” Millennium—Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 771–801.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 2003. Power after Lukes: A Review of the Literature. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Gaventa, J. 2011. Powercube Forms of Power [Online]. Available: http://www.powercube.net/analyse-power/forms-of-power/ [Accessed 24 October 2012].Google Scholar
Graham, J.D. 1992. “The Safety Risks of Proposed Fuel Economy Legislation.” Risk 3 (2): 95–126.Google Scholar
Greene, D. 1998. “Why CAFE Worked.” Energy Policy 26 (8): 595–613.Google Scholar
Gunster, S. 2005. “‘You Belong Outside’: Advertising, Nature, and the Suv.” Ethics & the Environment 9 (2): 4–32.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 2008. “$4 Gasoline and Fuel Economy: Auto Industry at a Crossroads.” Hearing by the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming . Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Hathaway, T. 2016. “Lukes Reloaded: An Actor-Centred Three-Dimensional Power Framework.” Politics 36 (2): 118–130 Google Scholar
Hayward, C. 2000. De-Facing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, C., and Lukes, S. 2008. “Nobody to Shoot? Power, Structure, and Agency: A Dialogue.” Journal of Power 1 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Himelfarb, R., and Perotti, R. 2004. Principle over Politics?: The Domestic Policy of the George H.W. Bush Presidency. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. 2013. About the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety [Online]. Available: http://www.iihs.org/about.html [Accessed 9 April 2013].Google Scholar
International Energy Agency. 2009. Oil Information 2009. Paris.Google Scholar
Johal, S., Moran, M., and Williams, K. 2014. “Power, Politics and the City of London after the Great Financial Crisis.” Government and Opposition, 49 (3): 400–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazman, S. 2007. First, Do No Harm to Motorists [Online]. Available: http://cei.org/studies-point/first-do-no-harm-motorists [Accessed 7 November 2011].Google Scholar
Kerry, J. 2001. “Corporate Average Fuel Economy (Cafe) Reform.” Hearing by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Kirby, E.G. 1995. “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of U.S. CAFE Policy.” Energy Policy 23 (2): 107–09.Google Scholar
Levin, C. 2002. “National Laboratories Partnership Improvement Act of 2001.” Congressional Record. 12 March 2002.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. 1982. “The Market As Prison.” The Journal of Politics 44: 324–36.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C.E. 2001. The Market System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, C.E., and Woodhouse, E.J. 1993. The Policy-Making Process. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Luger, S. 2000. Corporate Power, American Democracy, and the Automobile Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. 1977. Essays in Social Theory. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. 2002. “Power and Agency.” The British Journal of Sociology 53 (3): 491–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A Radical View: Second Edition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Miliband, R. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moore, T.G. 1991. “Central Planning USA-Style: The Case against Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards.” Stanford University: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Moran, M. 2009. Business, Politics, and Society: An Anglo-American Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences 2002. Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Energy Policy Development Group 2001. National Energy Policy, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
NHTSA 2008. “Average Fuel Economy Standards, Passenger Cars and Light Trucks; Model Years 2011–2015; Proposed Rule.” Federal Register. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
NHTSA. 2012. NHTSA and EPA Set Standards to Improve Fuel Economy and Reduce Greenhouse Gases for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks for Model Years 2017 and Beyond [Online]. Available: http://www.nhtsa.gov/staticfiles/.../cafe/2017-25_CAFE_NPRM_Factsheet.pdf [Accessed 16 July 2015].Google Scholar
Peters, E. 2007. No to New Fuel Economy Standards: Consumer Choice, Not Congress, Should Drive Detroit's Decisionmaking [Online]. Available: http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA556_Fuel_Economy_Markey_Platts.html [Accessed 15 February 2012].Google Scholar
Polsby, N. 1963. Community Power and Political Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. 1978. Political Power and Social Classes. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Powercube.net. 2012. Invisible Power and Hegemony [Online]. Available: http://www.powercube.net/other-forms-of-power/hegemony-and-invisible-power/ [Accessed 13 September 2012].Google Scholar
Public Citizen. 2001a. Graham Put on Notice by Senate to Protect Public Health, Safety and the Environment [Online]. Available: http://www.citizen.org/congress/regulations/graham.html [Accessed 8 March 2013].Google Scholar
Public Citizen. 2001b. Nomination of Graham Opposed by Fifty-Three Academics [Online]. Available: http://www.citizen.org/congress/regulations/graham/academics.html [Accessed 8 March 2013].Google Scholar
Public Citizen. 2005. Comments on Proposed Rulemaking [Online]. Available: www.citizen.org/documents/2005_FE_Comments.pdf [Accessed 22 November 2011].Google Scholar
Public Citizen. 2007. Slip Sliding Away [Online]. Available: http://www.citizen.org/documents/cheneyscale.pdf [Accessed 16 July 2015].Google Scholar
Repetto, R. 2006. Punctuated Equilibrium and the Dynamics of U.S. Environmental Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rowell, A. 1996. Green Backlash: Global Subversion of the Environmental Movement; London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rutledge, I. 2005. Addicted to Oil: America's Relentless Drive for Energy Security. London: I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. Hinsdale, Illinois: The Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Sivak, M., and Tsimhoni, O. 2009. “Fuel Efficiency of Vehicles on Us Roads: 1923–2006.” Energy Policy 37 (8): 3168–70.Google Scholar
Smart, K. 2000. “Losing Ground: How Suvs Are Making the United States Less Fuel-Efficient and Options for Reversing the Downward Trend.” Environmental Law 7 (1): 159–83.Google Scholar
Strange, S. 1994. States and Markets. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
Truman, D. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Vanderheiden, S. 2006. “Assessing the Case against the Suv.” Environmental Politics 15 (1): 23–40.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 1997. Trading Up: Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. 1984. “Liberalism and the Art of Separation” Political Theory 12 (3): 315–330.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. 2013. The Political Power of the Business Corporation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, R.E. 1973. The Politics of Progress. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wright Mills, C. 1956. The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yacobucci, B., and Bamberger, R. 2007a. “Automobile and Light Truck Fuel Economy: The Cafe Standards.” Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Yacobucci, B., and Bamberger, R. 2007b. “Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE): A Comparison of Selected Legislation in the 110th Congress.” Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar