Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:43:14.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Club goods, intellectual property rights, and profitability in the information economy†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

Herman Mark Schwartz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Are club goods becoming more widespread in developed economies, and, if so, what is the broader significance of this trend? Club goods are as salient for the profitability of non-financial firms as for finance. First, corporate strategy today largely revolves around the generation or acquisition of intellectual property rights and other club/franchise goods. Second, financialization is not just about the credit relationship between financial firms on the one side and non-financial corporate and household borrowers on the other, but also about Main Street's ability to use financial power to suppress competition in its own markets. Third, firms’ strategic reliance on IPRs and club goods more generally has magnified both profit and wage inequality in the broader economy. This inequality combines with changes in corporate structure to produce a significant part of the household level income inequality we currently observe in the United States. Fourth, all these processes are ineluctably political, because the state necessarily constitutes club or franchise goods, just like any property right. But the quantity and quality of those property rights is an indeterminate outcome of struggles among firms over the size of and shares of the pool of profits in a given national and global economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 19 , Special Issue 2: Property Rights, Financial Risk, and the Politics of a Networked Global Financial System , June 2017 , pp. 191 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2017 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

The author would like to thank John Echeverri-Gent, Peter Hall, Anastasia Nesvetailova, Ronen Palan and Bent Sofus Tranøy for discussion, comment, and criticism, and Steven Liao for help with data. Errors remain mine.

References

Aglietta, Michel. 2000. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Autor, David. 2003. “Outsourcing at Will: The Contribution of Unjust Dismissal Doctrine to the Growth of Employment Outsourcing.” Journal of Labor Economics 21 (1): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baily, Martin Neil, and Bosworth, Barry P.. 2014. “US Manufacturing: Understanding Its Past and Its Potential Future” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Erling, Bryson, Alex, Davis, James C., and Freeman, Richard. 2014. “It's Where You Work: Increases in Earnings Dispersion Across Establishments and Individuals in the US.” National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 20447. Chicago: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessen, James, Meurer, Michael, and Laurissa, Jennifer. 2011. “The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls.” Boston University School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper 11–45. Boston: Boston University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Fred, and Keller, Matthew R., eds. 2011. State of Innovation. London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Boldrin, Michele and Levine, Daniel. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M. 1965. “An economic theory of clubs.” Economica 32 (125): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Bureau. 2015. “Osiris: Information on Listed Companies, Global.” http://www.bvdinfo.com/en-us/our-products/company-information/international-products/osiris (Accessed October 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Campbell, John and Lindberg, Leon. 1990. “Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity by the State.” American Sociological Review 55 (4): 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. 1977. The Visible Hand: The Management Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Christophers, Brett. 2016. The Great Leveler: Capitalism and Competition in the Court of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1974. Toward a Theory of Property Rights. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbs, Richard, Koller, Tim, Ramaswamy, Sree, Woetzel, Jonathan, Manyika, James, Krishnan, Rohit, and Andreula, Nicolo. 2015. Playing to Win: The New Global Competition for Corporate Profits. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
Doctorow, Cory. 2014. Information Doesn't Want to be Free. San Francisco, CA: McSweeney's.Google Scholar
Doidge, Craig, Karolyi, Andrew, and Stulz, René. 2015. “The US listing gap.” United States National Bureau of Economic Research working paper w21181. Chicago: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, Peter, and Braithwaite, John. 2002. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth. 1986. “The State, Banks and Industry: The West German Case.” In State, Finance and Industry. A Comparative Analysis of Post-War Trends in Six Advanced Industrial Economies, edited by Cox, Andrew. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Ford Motor Co. 2015. Annual Report 2015. http://corporate.ford.com/annual-reports/2015/index.html (Accessed June 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Furman, Jason, and Orszag, Peter. 2015. “A Firm-Level Perspective on the Role of Rents in the Rise in Inequality.” Presentation at “A Just Society” Centennial Event in Honor of Joseph Stiglitz Columbia University.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 1994. New Deals: Business, Labor, and Politics in America, 1920–1935. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Bronwyn and Ziedonis, Rosemarie. 2001. “The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the US Semiconductor Industry, 1979–1995.” RAND Journal of Economics 32 (1): 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Bronwyn and Ziedonis, Rosemarie. 2007. “An Empirical Analysis of Patent Litigation in the Semiconductor Industry.” University of California at Berkeley working paper 217–242. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1982. Collective Action, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurt, Shelley. 2010. “Science, Power and the State: U.S. Foreign Policy, Intellectual Property Law, and the Origins of Agricultural Biotechnology, 1969–1994.” Ph.D. dissertation New School for Social Research.Google Scholar
Katz, Lawrence and Krueger, Alan. 2016. “ The Rise and Nature of Alternative Work Arrangements in the United States, 1995–2015. ” Unpublished manuscript Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazonick, William. 2009. “The New Economy Business Model and the Crisis of US Capitalism.” Capitalism and Society 4 (2): 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, Barry. 2009. Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism and the Economics of Destruction. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Marianna. 2013. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Myths in Risk and Innovation. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Online, Mergent. 2015. http://www.mergentonline.com/basicsearch.php (Accessed August 30, 2015).Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2008. Growing Unequal: Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States.” The American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Victor and Ostrom, Elinor. 1977. “Public Goods and Public Choices.” In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance, edited by Savas, Emanuel. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pagano, Ugo and Rossi, Maria. 2009. “The Crash of the Knowledge Economy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (4): 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piore, Michael and Sabel, Charles. 1984. Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles. 1982. Work and Politics: The Division of Labor in Industry. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1954. “The pure theory of public expenditure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 36(4): 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schacht, Wendy. 2006. Patent Reform: Issues in the Biomedical and Software Industries. Congressional Research Service, available at: http://sharp.sefora.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/rl33367.pdf (Accessed April 7, 2006).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Herman Mark. 2016. The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences. 2 (6): 226–249.Google Scholar
Sell, Susan. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selmier II, W. Travis. 2017. “An Institutional Perspective on Governance, Power, and Politics of Financial Risk.” Business and Politics 19 (2): 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 2001. “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting.” March. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=273550 (Accessed September 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Song, Jae, Price, David, Guvenen, Fatih, Bloom, Nicholas, and von Wachter, Till. 2015. “Firming up Inequality.” National Bureau of Economic Research working paper w21199. Chicago: NBER.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein 1919. “On the Nature of Capital, I and II.” In The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, edited by Veblen, Thorstein. New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1963. The Engineers and the Price System. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1978. The Theory of Business Enterprise. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Vitols, Sigurt. 2001. “The Origins of Bank-Based and Market-Based Financial Systems: Germany, Japan, and the United States.” In The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Yamamura, Kozo. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Weil, David. 2014. The Fissured Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Linda. 2014. America Inc.? Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Karel, Haslam, Colin, Williams, John, Johal, Sukhdev, and Adcroft, Andy. 1994. Cars: Analysis, History, Cases. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Womack, James, Jones, David, and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Jonathan and Herrigel, Gary. 2000. Americanization and its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar