Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:47:13.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coalition Formation and Models of Capitalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael G. Hall
Michael G. Hall*
Affiliation:
University of Northern Iowa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do different industrial democracies employ different processes in determining trade policy and different models of capitalism? Two variables account for the nature of the decision-making process for trade policy. First, the level of inter-industry factor mobility determines if class or sectoral coalitions predominate. Second, the size of policy coalitions depends on which branch of government dominates trade policy. Legislatures favor minimum winning coalitions, while executives favor maximal coalitions. These two variables condition different patterns of coalition making: partisan, pluralist, corporatist, and interventionist. I illustrate this theory analyzing the development of policymaking concerning trade in France and Sweden.

Keywords

comparative political economycoalitionscorporatismexecutive-legislative relationsfactor mobilityFrancemodels of capitalismpluralismSwedentrade
Type
Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , December 2006 , pp. 1 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2006 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agra Europe, 1995, High Food Prices Cool Swedish Euro-enthusiasm, 29 September, E6.Google Scholar
Albert, M., 1993, Capitalism against Capitalism (Whurr Publishers).Google Scholar
Alt, James E. and Gilligan, Michael, 1994, The Political Economy of Trading States: Factor Specificity, Collective Action Problems, and Domestic Political Institutions, Journal of Political Philosophy, 2 (2) June, 165–192.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., 1977, France 1870–1914: Politics and Society (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Arter, David, 1999, Scandinavian Politics Today (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
Berger, Suzanne, 1980, The Traditional Sector in France and Italy, in Berger, Suzanne and Piore, Michael, ed., Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Chase, Kerry, 2003, Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA, International Organization, 57 (1) Winter, 137–174.Google Scholar
Christensen, Dag Arne, 1996, The Left-wing Opposition in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: Cases of Euro-phobia? West European Politics, 19 (3) July, 525–546.Google Scholar
Coates, David, 1999, Models of Capitalism in the New World Order: the UK Case, Political Studies, 47 (4) September, 643–660.Google Scholar
Coates, David 2000, Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Commissariat Général du Plan (CGP), 1947, Rapport sur le Premier Plan de Modernisation et d'Equipement.Google Scholar
Coates, David 1956, Deuxième Plan de Modernisation et d'Equipement, (1954–1957), Loi no. 56–342 du 27 mars 1956: Imprimerie des Journaux Officiels, no. 1057.Google Scholar
Coates, David 1971, VIth Economic and Social Development Plan: General Report, Act no. 71–567 of 15 July 1971.Google Scholar
Coates, David 1979, VIIe Plan de Développement Économique et Social.Google Scholar
Copeland, Gary and Patterson, Samuel, 1994, Parliaments of the Modern World (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Damgaard, Erik, 1994, The Strong Parliaments of Scandinavia: Continuity and Change of Scandinavian Parliaments, in Copeland, Gary and Patterson, Samuel, eds., Parliaments of the Modern World (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Derfler, Leslie, 1983, President and Parliament: A Short History of the French Presidency (Boca Raton: University Presses of Florida).Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., 1976, Coalitions in Parliamentary Government (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony, 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Ehrmann, Henry W., 1954, The French Trade Associations and the Ratification of the Schuman Plan, World Politics, 6 (4) July, 453–481.Google Scholar
Elwitt, Sanford, 1975, The Making of the Third Republic: Class and Politics in France, 1868–1884 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press).Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander, 1962, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Golob, Eugene, 1944, The Méline Tariff: French Agriculture and Nationalist Economic Policy (New York, NY: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter, 1986, Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, 1993, Allies, Adversaries, and International Trade (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Greenwood, Justin and Ronit, Karsten, 1994, Interest Groups in the European Community: Newly Emerging Dynamics and Forms, West European Politics, 17 (1) January, 31–52.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim and Snyder, James M. Jr., 1996, Buying Supermajorities, American Political Science Review, 90 (2) June, 303–315.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., 1986, Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David, 2001, Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, M. Donald, 1972, Sweden: The Politics of Postindustrial Change (Hinsdale, IL: Dreyen Press).Google Scholar
Hart, Jeffrey A., 1992, Rival Capitalists: International Competitiveness in the United States, Japan and Western Europe (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Heckscher, Eli F., 1954, An Economic History of Sweden (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hershey, Marjorie Randon, 1973, Incumbency and the Minimum Winning Coalition, American Journal of Political Science, 42 (3) August, 631–637.Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J., 2002, International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions and Mobility (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J., 2004, International Capital Mobility and Trade Politics: Capital Flows, Political Coalitions, and Lobbying, Economics and Politics, 16 (3) November, 253–285.Google Scholar
Howell, Chris, 2003, Varieties of Capitalism: And Then There Was One? Comparative Politics, 36 (1) October, 103–124.Google Scholar
Jahn, Detlef and Storsved, Ann-Sofie, 1995, Legitimacy Through Referendum? The Nearly Successful Domino-strategy of the EU-referendum in Austria, Finland, Sweden and Norway, West European Politics, 18 (4) October, 18–37.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers, 1982, MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Jones, H. G., 1976, Planning and Productivity in Sweden (London: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., 1985, Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Kuisel, Richard, 1981, Capitalism and the State in Modern France (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Lake, David, 1988, Power, Protection, and Free Trade (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, 1971, Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method, American Political Science Review, 65 (3) September, 682–693.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne and O'Halloran, Sharyn, 1994, Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy, International Organization, 48 (4) Autumn, 595–632.Google Scholar
Lutz, D. S. and Murray, R. W., 1976, Minimum coalitions in legislatures: A review of the evidence, Sage Professional Papers, No. 04–028 (Beverly Hills: Sage).Google Scholar
Mabbett, Deborah, 1995, Trade, Employment and Welfare: A Comparative Study of Trade and Labor Market Policies in Sweden and New Zealand 1880–1980 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Maier, Charles S., 1975, Recasting Bourgeois Europe: Stabilization in France, Germany, and Italy in the Decade After World War I (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mayhew, David, 1974, Congress: The Electoral Connection (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Messerlin, Patrick, 1987, France: the ambitious state, in: Duchene, Francois and Shepherd, Geoffrey, eds., Managing Industrial Change in Western Europe (London: Frances Pinter).Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., 1988, Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., 1997, Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Mytelka, Lynn Krieger, 1982, The French Textile Industry: Crisis and Adjustment, in Jacobson, Harold K. and Sidjanski, Dusan, eds., The Emerging International Economic Order: Dynamic Processes, Constraints and Opportunities (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur, 1982, The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Pontusson, Jonas, 1991, Labor, Corporatism, and Industrial Policy: The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective, Comparative Politics, 23 (2) January, 163–179.Google Scholar
Priouret, Roger, 1963, Origines du Patronat Francais (Paris: Grasset).Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Teune, Henry, 1970, The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry (Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company).Google Scholar
Riker, William H., 1962, The Theory of Political Coalitions (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ronald, 1989, Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart, 1955, The Politics of Compromise: A Study of Parties and Cabinet Government in Sweden (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Safran, William, 1977, The French Polity (New York: David McKay Company).Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A., 1991, Political Parties and the Winning of Office (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A., 2000, The Changing Dynamics of State-Society Relations in the Fifth Republic, in Elgie, Robert, ed., The Changing French Political System (London: Frank Cass Publishers).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A., 2002, The Futures of European Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schmitter, Phillipe C., 1971, Still the Century of Corporatism, in: Schmitter, Phillipe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard, eds., Trends toward Capitalist Intermediation (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
Smith, Michael S., 1977, “Free Trade Versus Protection in the Early Third Republic: Economic Interests, Tariff Poicy, and the Making of the Republican Synthesis,” French Historical Studies, 10 (2) Fall, 293–314.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael S., 1980, Tariff Reform in France 1860–1900: The Politics of Economic Interest (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Soulier, Auguste, 1939, L'Instabilité Ministérielle sous la Troisième République (1871–1938) (Sirey).Google Scholar
Stjernquist, Nils, 1966, Sweden: Stability or Deadlock? in Dahl, Robert A., ed. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Stokes, Bruce, 2006, Seeing Doha Through French Eyes, National Journal, 38 (16) 22 April, 52–53.Google Scholar
Stolper, Wolfgang F. and Samuelson, Paul, 1941, Protection and Real Wages, Review of Economic Studies, 9 (1) January, 58–73.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wofgang and Yamamura, Kozo, 2001, The Origins of Nonliberal Capitalism: Germany and Japan in Comparison (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Sundberg, Jan, 2002, The Scandinavian Party Model at the Crossroads, in Webb, Paul, Farrell, David M., and Holliday, Ian, eds., Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Verdier, Daniel, 1994, Democracy and International Trade: Britain, France, and the United States 1860–1990 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Verney, Douglas V., 1957, Parliamentary Reform in Sweden 1866–1921 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R., 1979, A Rational Choice Perspective on Congressional Norms, American Journal of Political Science, 23 (1) February, 245–62.Google Scholar
Weiss, Jonathan, 1994, Swedes Vote Yes, Europe, December-January, 342.Google Scholar
Wickham, S., 1963, French Planning: Retrospect and Prospect, Review of Economics and Statistics, 45 (4) November, 335–347.Google Scholar
Wright, Gordon, 1964, Rural Revolution in France: The Peasantry in the Twentieth Century (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Zysman, John, 1983, Governments, Markets, and Growth: Financial Systems and the Politics of Industrial Change (Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar