Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:12:18.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The specialization curse: How economic specialization shapes public goods provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

Benjamin Barber IV  and
Nimah Mazaheri Open the ORCID record for Nimah Mazaheri [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between economic specialization and government expenditures. We hypothesize that citizens and firms in economically specialized regions pressure politicians to invest in core economic sectors in lieu of spending on public goods that benefit the broader economy, such as education. We investigate our hypothesis through an examination of the United States and India. We confirm a negative relationship between economically specialized U.S. states and education spending, and a positive relationship between economically specialized U.S. states and firm subsidies. Next, we examine the effects of an immediate shock in a region's level of economic specialization by comparing Indian states created from federal bifurcation. We show how the creation of two highly specialized states (Bihar and Jharkhand) from a diversified state (Undivided Bihar) was associated with a decline in education spending but an increase in subsidies for core sectors.

Keywords

specializationpublic goodsspendingsubsidiesUnited StatesIndia
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 415 - 444
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2019 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James. 2006. “Economic Backwardness in Political Perspective.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 115–31.Google Scholar
Aiginger, Karl, and Rossi-Hansberg, Esteban. 2006. “Specialization and Concentration: A Note on Theory and Evidence.” Empirica 33 (4): 255–66.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and La Ferrara, Eliana. 2005. “Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance.” Journal of Economic Literature 43 (3): 762–800.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Baqir, Reza, and Easterly, William. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4): 1243–84.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit, and Somanathan, Rohini. 2007. “The Political Economy of Public Goods: Some Evidence from India.” Journal of Development Economics 82 (2): 287–314.Google Scholar
Beblawi, Hazem, and Luciani, Giacomo. 1987. The Rentier State. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bergstrom, Theodore C., and Goodman, Robert P.. 1973. “Private Demands for Public Goods.” American Economic Review 63 (3): 280–96.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Burgess, Robin. 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1415–51.Google Scholar
Bharti, Indu. 1990. “New Government, New Hope.” Economic and Political Weekly (June): 1373–74.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Troy, and Matthews, Todd L.. 2006. “The Configuration of Local Economic Power and Civic Participation in the Global Economy.” Social Forces 84 (4): 2241–57.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Posner, Daniel N.. 1998. “Social Capital: Explaining its Origin and Effects on Government Performance.” British Journal of Political Science 28 (4): 686–89.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Morrow, James, and Siverson, Randolph. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L., and Reinhardt, Eric. 1999. “Industrial Location and Protection: The Political and Economic Geography of U.S. Nontariff Barriers.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1028–50.Google Scholar
Dunning, John. 1997. “Governments and the Macro-organization of Economic Activity: An Historical and Spatial Perspective.” Review of International Political Economy 4 (1): 42–86.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1964. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander, and Bennett, Andrew. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Ellis, Wibbels, Erik, and Mvukiyehe, Eric. 2008. “Lessons from Strange Cases: Democracy, Development, and the Resource Curse in the U.S. States.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 477–514.Google Scholar
Gylfason, Toryaldur. 2001. “Natural Resources, Education, and Economic Development.” European Economic Review 45 (4–6): 847–59.Google Scholar
Hesse, Heiko. 2008. “Export Diversification and Economic Growth.” (Accessed on 23 August 2018) http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTPREMNET/Resources/489960-1338997241035/Growth_C.Google Scholar
Hill, Matthew D., Wayne Kelly, G., Brandon Lockhart, G., and Van Ness, Robert A.. 2011. “Determinants and Effects of Corporate Lobbying.” (Accessed on 23 August 2018) http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=.Google Scholar
Hong, Ji Yeon. 2017. “Does Oil Hinder Social Spending? Evidence from Dictatorships, 1972–2008.” Studies in Comparative International Development 52 (4): 457–82.Google Scholar
Imbs, Jean, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Stages of Diversification.” American Economic Review 93 (1): 63–86.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan, and Malesky, Edmund. 2018. Incentives to Pander: How Politicians Use Corporate Welfare for Political Gain. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaur, Rajwinder. 2012. “Agricultural Subsidies in Punjab: An Analysis.” Ph.D. diss. Punjabi University.Google Scholar
Kim, Jin-Hyuk. 2008. “Corporate Lobbying Revisited.” Business and Politics 10 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
Kishore, Avinash. 2004. “Understanding Agrarian Impasse in Bihar.” Economic and Political Weekly 39 (31): 3484–491.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1987. The State and Poverty in India: The Politics of Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., and Baum, Matthew. 2001. “The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (6): 587–621.Google Scholar
Levy, Gilat. 2005. “The Politics of Public Provision of Education.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1507–34.Google Scholar
Majumdar, Manabi, and Mooij, Jos. 2012. Education and Inequality in India: A Classroom View. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, Santosh. 2006. The Economics of Elementary Education in India. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Morrison, Kevin. 2009. “Oil, Nontax Revenue, and the Redistributional Foundations of Regime Stability.” International Organization 63 (1): 107–138.Google Scholar
Mukherji, Arnab, and Mukherji, Anjan. 2012. “Bihar: What Went Wrong? And What Changed?” (Accesed on 23 August, 2018) http://www.nipfp.org.in/media/medialibrary/2013/04/WP_2012_107.pdf.Google Scholar
Murray, Sheila, Reuben, Kim, and Rosenberg, Carol. 2007. “State Education Spending: Current Pressures and Future Trends.” National Tax Journal 60 (2): 325–45.Google Scholar
Ojah, Oineetom. 2008. “Centre Wants Jharkhand to Check Tilt Towards Subsidies.” The Financial Express (February).Google Scholar
Olsson, Ola, and Valsecchi, Michele. 2012. “Resource Windfalls and Public Goods: Evidence from a Policy Reform.” (Accessed on 23 August 2018). http://www.uniba.it/ricerca/dipartimenti/dse/e.g.i/egi_papers2013/valsecchi.Google Scholar
Park, Jong Hee. 2012. “What Determines the Specificity of Subsidies.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (2): 413–26.Google Scholar
Poterba, James M. 1997. “Demographic Structure and the Political Economy of Public Education.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 16 (1): 48–66.Google Scholar
Prakash, Amit. 2001. Jharkhand: Politics of Development and Identity. New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Prasad, KN. 1997. Bihar Economy through the Plans. New Delhi: Northern Book Centre.Google Scholar
Pred, Allan R. 1966. The Spatial Dynamics of U.S. Urban-Industrial Growth, 1800–1914: Interpretive and Theoretical Essays. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 2004. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Richter, Brian Kelleher, Samphantharak, Krislert, and Timmons, Jeffrey F.. 2009. “Lobbying and Taxes.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 893–909.Google Scholar
Rickard, Stephanie. 2012. “Electoral Systems, Voters’ Interests and Geographic Dispersion.” British Journal of Political Science 42(4): 855–77.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2011. The Long Shadow of the Industrial Revolution: Political Geography and the Representation of the Left. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2012. The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Saez, Lawrence. 2002. Federalism without a Centre: The Impact of Political and Economic Reform on India's Federal System. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Salamon, Lester M., and Siegfried, John. 1977. “Economic Power and Political Influence: The Impact of Industry Structure on Public Policy.” American Political Science Review 71 (3): 1026–43.Google Scholar
Shankar, Uday. 1993. “Tata Steel Lease Creates a Furore.” Down to Earth, March 31.Google Scholar
Sinha, AP. 1981. “Economic Backwardness of Bihar and Certain Relevant Aspects of Census Data.” In Studies in Bihar's Economy and Society, ed. Karna, MN. New Delhi: Concept Publishing.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2): 174–97.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1981. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Carmel, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Synder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 93–110.Google Scholar
Tillin, Louise. 2013. Remapping India: New States and their Political Origins. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael. 1989. “Union Membership in Advanced Industrial Democracies.” American Political Science Review 83 (2): 481–501.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Barber and Mazaheri supplementary material

Barber and Mazaheri supplementary material 1

Download Barber and Mazaheri supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 755 KB