Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:01:30.901Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transatlantic Partnership Agreement: an American perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2017

Claude Barfield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the internal dynamics of American trade policy making in the context of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations. The author describes the active role interest groups, the U.S. business community, and representatives on both sides of the political spectrum have played in the passing of Transatlantic Partnership Agreement (TPA), the TPP negotiations, and currently the TTIP debate. Lastly, the author lays out the challenges TTIP will continue to face in light of opposition to specific TPP provisions, trans-atlantic disagreement over ISDS and data flows, and the recent presidential elections.

Keywords

international tradeTTIPUnited StatesUSTREuropean Uniontrade agreements
Type
Research Article
Information
Business and Politics , Volume 19 , Special Issue 4: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) , December 2017 , pp. 659 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © V.K. Aggarwal 2017 and published under exclusive license to Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Evenett, Simon J.. 2012. “The Sad Truth Behind Growing Clashes at the WTO.” Harvard Business Review. (Accessed on 11 June 2017) https://hbr.org/2012/10/the-sad-truth-behind-the-growi.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Evenett, Simon J.. 2017. “The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Limits on negotiating behind the border barriers.” Business and Politics. doi: 10.1017/bap.2017.19.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude. 2014. “The Trans-Pacific Partnership and America's Strategic Role in Asia.” Paper presented at the American Institute for Asian Studies Conference, Washington, D.C. (Accessed on 16 June 2017) https://www.aei.org/publication/trans-pacific-partnership-americas-strategic-role-asia/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, Claude. 2015. “Trade Promotion Authority: A Winning Bargain for Congress and the President.” American Enterprise Institute. (Accessed on 19 February 2015) https://www.aei.org/publication/trade-promotion-authority-winning-bargain-congress-president/.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude. 2016. “The Trade Policy Paradox: Deepening Political Divisions and Long-Term Continuity.” Paper prepared for the Patrick Messerlin Festschrift, in manuscript.Google Scholar
Barfield, Claude. 2017. “The Trump administration, US-Korean economic relations, and Asian regionalism.” Joint U.S. Korea Academic Studies. Vol. 28. (Accessed on 5 August 2017). http://www.keia.org/sites/default/files/publications/kei_jointus-korea_2017_digital_final.pdf Google Scholar
Barrie, Leonie. 2014. “Apparel and textiles face specific issues in TTIP talks.” Apparel Industry Analysis. (Accessed on 12 June 2017) http://www.just-style.com/analysis/apparel-and-textiles-face-specific-issues-in-ttip-talks_id121851.aspx.Google Scholar
Belin, Nathaniel et al. 2017. “Trump administration takes new action to enforce…” Memorandum, Skadden, Arps, Meagher, and From LLP. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Bridges Weekly. 2015. “European Commission Releases Draft Proposal on TTIP Investment Court.” Bridges Weekly. (Accessed on 16 June 2017) http://www.ictsd.org/bridges-news/bridges/news/european-commission-releases-draft-proposal-on-ttip-investment-court.Google Scholar
Bromund, Theodore, Roberts, James, and Dasgupta, Riddhi. 2015. “The Proposed Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Mechanism: U.S. Should Oppose EU demand to Abandon it.” Inside US Trade. (Accessed on 22 June 2017) http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2015/07/the-proposed-investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds-mechanism-us-should-oppose-eu-demand-to-abandon-it.Google Scholar
Business Group's Letter on TTIP. 2015. (Accessed on 8 June 2017) http://businessroundtable.org.Google Scholar
Citizens Trade Campaign. 2015. “Over 2,000 Organizations Call on Congress to Oppose Fast Track Authority for the TPP.” (Accessed on 4 June 2017) http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/blog/2015/04/27/2009-organizations-call-on-congress-to-oppose-fast-track-authority-for-the-tpp/.Google Scholar
Dreyer, Iana. 2017. “The pitfalls of pursuing TTIP in 2017.” Borderlex. (Accessed 30 March 2017) http://www.borderlex.eu/opinion-pitfalls-pushing-ttip-2017/.Google Scholar
EurActiv. 2015. “European Parliament backs TTIP, rejects ISDS.” (Accessed on 1 June 2017) http://www.euractiv.com/sections/global-europe/european-parliament-backs-ttip-rejects-isds-316142.Google Scholar
Inside US Trade. 2015a. “U.S. Chamber, ISDS Critics Blast EU Investment Proposal; Parliament Praises.” (Accessed on 6 June 2017) https://insidetrade.com/inside-us-trade/us-chamber-isds-critics-blast-eu-investment-proposal-parliament-praises.Google Scholar
Inside US Trade. 2015b. “U.S. Business Reps Fret Over ‘Right To Regulate’ In EU ISDS Proposal.” (Accessed on 6 June 2017) https://insidetrade.com/daily-news/us-business-reps-fret-over-right-regulate-eu-isds-proposal.Google Scholar
Inside US Trade. 2015c. “High EU Court Ruling Invalidates ‘Safe Harbor,’ But Next Steps Unclear.” (Accessed 31 June 2017) https://insidetrade.com/daily-news/high-eu-court-ruling-invalidates-safe-harbor-next-steps-unclear.Google Scholar
Johnson, Pierre-Marc and Beaulieu, Andre. 1996. The Environment and NAFTA: Understanding and Implementing New Continental Law. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
Joint Letter from 38 U.S. agricultural organizations to USTR Ron Kirk. 2013. Accessed June 17, 2017. http://naega.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/2012-November-15-USTR-Agriculture-US-EU-FTA-Letter.pdf.Google Scholar
Joint Letter from 41 U.S. agricultural organizations to Michael Froman, Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economic Relations. 2013. (Accessed on 15 June 2017) http://www.nppc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013.05.20-TTIPAgLtrFroman.pdf.Google Scholar
Lawder, David. 2017. “Trump Adviser Navarro…” Reuters. (Accessed 6 March 2017) http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-trade-navarro/trump-adviser-navarro-u-s-germany-should-discuss-trade-outside-eu-idUSKBN16D1KK.Google Scholar
Lopez, Linette. 2017. “Trump repeated a delusion about Germany…” Business Insider. (Accessed on 18 March 2017) http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-repeats-claim-that-germany-can-negotiate-trade-outside-of-eu-2017-3.Google Scholar
Navarro, Peter and Ross, Wilbur. 2016. “White Paper: Scoring the Trump Economic Plan.” Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Needham, Vicki. 2017. “Ross prefers linking bilateral trade agreements.” The Hill. (Accessed 18 January 2017) http://thehill.com/policy/finance/314846-ross-prefers-inking-bilateral-trade-agreements.Google Scholar
Office of the United Sates Trade Representative. 2017. “The President's Trade Policy Agenda.” Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Statement of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. 2013. Accessed on 15 June 2017) https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/documents/files/USTR-2013-0019TTIP-U.S.ChamberofCommerceSubmission.pdf.Google Scholar
Stupp, Catherine. 2015. “Officials call for TTIP digital trade boost as US-EU tech tensions linger.” EurActiv. (Accessed on 29 June 2017) http://www.euractiv.com/sections/trade-society/officials-call-ttip-digital-trade-boost-us-eu-tech-tensions-linger-316564.Google Scholar
The Sierra Club. 2015. “The Truth Behind the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.” (Accessed 25 June 2017) http://www.sierraclub.org/trade/truth-behind-ttip.Google Scholar
Trumka, Richard L. (2015). “US Trade Policy and American Workers: Finding the Elusive Win-Win Solution.” Prepared Remarks of AFL-CIO president, Peterson Institute for International Economics. (Accessed on 15 June 2017) http://www.aflcio.org/Press-Room/Speeches/U.S.-Trade-Policy-and-American-Workers-Finding-the-Elusive-Win-Win-Solution-Peterson-Institute-for-International-Economics.Google Scholar
Trump, Donald J. 2017. “Address to joint session of Congress.” U.S. Congress. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
USTR. 2015a. Fact Sheet, “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Upgrading and Improving Investor-State Dispute Settlement.” Washington, D.C. (Accessed on 23 June 2017) https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Upgrading-and-Improving-Investor-State-Dispute-Settlement-Fact-Sheet.pdf.Google Scholar
USTR. 2015b. Fact Sheets, “Ensuring a Free and Open Internet,” and “Promoting Digital Trade.” Washington, D.C. Accessed (9 June 2017) https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Ensuring-a-Free-and-Open-Internet-Fact-Sheet.pdf and (Accessed on 9 June 2017) https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Promoting-Digital-Trade-Fact-Sheet.pdf.Google Scholar
USTR. 2017. “2017 Trade Policy Agenda and 2016 Annual Report.” Washington, D.C. (Accessed on 4 August 2017) https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/reports/2017/AnnualReport/Chapter%20I%20-%20The%20President%27s%20Trade%20Policy%20Agenda.pdf.Google Scholar